scholarly journals Influence of Preparation Design, Restorative Material and Load Direction on The Stress Distribution of Ceramic Veneer in Upper Central Incisor

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Célia Fernandes Meirelles ◽  
Fernanda Zapater Pierre ◽  
João Paulo Mendes Tribst ◽  
Clovis Pagani ◽  
Eduardo Bresciani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Concentration ◽  
Stress Distribution ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Occlusal Plane ◽  
Central Incisor ◽  
Stress Concentrations ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Preparation Design

Objective: Evaluate the effect of four preparation designs, two ceramic materials, and two occlusion contact types on the stress distribution of ceramic veneer in upper central incisor. Material and methods:  3D-models were performed in the modeling software containing enamel, dentin, pulp, periodontal ligament and a base of polyurethane resin. The designs were modeled and exported to the computer aided engineering software to perform the static structural analysis. For the mesh, a total of 155429 tetrahedron elements and 271683 nodes were used, after a 10% convergence test. Two materials, lithium disilicate and feldspathic ceramics, were simulated. A static load of 100 N on 45º was applied on the incisal and middle thirds of the palatal tooth region, guided by the occlusal plane. The base was constrained in all directions. The Maximum Principal Stress was the failure criteria chosen for the analysis. Results: The Finite Element Analysis showed that the most conservative designs presented less stress concentration on the ceramic veneer. However, the highest tensile stress concentrations were observed on lithium disilicate veneer with extend design, on the middle third. The type of occlusal contact presented different stress patterns among the preparation designs; the incisal contact showed higher stress concentration compared to middle third contact regardless the ceramic material. Conclusions: To perform a ceramic veneer in upper central incisor, the feldspathic ceramic presented promising results and should be recommended when the extended design was done. Regarding contact types, the incisal contact is more prone to failure regardless the ceramic and preparation design.   Keywords Ceramics; Dental veneers; Finite element analysis.

Finite-Element Analysis of a Measuring Model for FeAlCrBSiNb Coating Bonding Strength of Revolution Body

2014 ◽  
Vol 577 ◽  
pp. 722-725
Author(s):  
Jia Ying Zhang ◽  
Gang Zhao ◽  
Ye Wang Sun ◽  
Jun Wei Yang ◽  
Huai Bin Yang
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Concentration ◽  
Stress Distribution ◽  
Bonding Strength ◽  
Bonding Interface ◽  
Shearing Stress ◽  
Measuring Process ◽  
Element Analysis

The stress distribution of the coating interface in measuring bonding strength of revolution body coating was emulated. The stress curves of coating bonding interface were obtained. The abscission characteristics of coating were analyzed. It showed that Stress concentration occurred in the symmetric centre of the coating bonding interface. The coating peeled off from the symmetric centre to both sides of the sample interface in the measuring process. Avoiding shearing stress was a method to promote the measuring test of bonding strength of revolution body coating.

scholarly journals Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis to Evaluate Stress Distribution in Tooth and Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Denture–An In Vitro Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (03) ◽  
pp. 084-091
Author(s):  
Himani Jain ◽  
Tarun Kalra ◽  
Manjit Kumar ◽  
Ajay Bansal ◽  
Deepti Jain
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Distribution ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Stress Concentrations ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Three Dimensional Finite Element

Abstract Introduction This study was undertaken to assess the influence of different superstructure materials, when subjected to occlusal loading, on the pattern of stress distribution in tooth-supported, implant-supported, and tooth implant-supported fixed partial prostheses, using the finite element analysis with a comparative viewpoint. Materials and Methods The geometric models of implant and mandibular bone were generated. Three models were created in accordance with the need of the study. The first model was given a tooth-supported fixed partial prosthesis. The second model was given tooth implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis, and the third model was given implant-supported fixed partial prosthesis. Forces of 100 N and 50 N were applied axially and buccolingually, respectively. Results The present study compared the stresses arising in the natural tooth, implant, and the whole prostheses under simulated axial and buccolingual loading of three types of fixed partial dentures, namely, tooth-supported, tooth implant-supported, and implant-supported fixed partial dental prostheses using three different types of materials. Conclusion The pattern of stress distribution did not appear to be significantly affected by the type of prosthesis materials in all models. The maximum stress concentrations were found in the alveolar bone around the neck of the teeth and implants.

scholarly journals A Finite Element Analysis to Compare Stress Distribution on Extra-Short Implants with Two Different Internal Connections

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1103 ◽  
Author(s):  
García-Braz ◽  
Prados-Privado ◽  
Zanatta ◽  
Calvo-Guirado ◽  
Prados-Frutos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Distribution ◽  
Axial Load ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Model ◽  
Stress Concentrations ◽  
Three Dimensional Model ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Short Implants

Background: The goal of this study was to analyze the stress distribution on two types of extra-short dental implants with 5 mm of length: An internal hexagon (IH) and morse taper connection (MT). Methods: The three-dimensional model was composed of trabecular and cortical bone, a crown, an extra-short dental implant and their components. An axial load of 150 N was applied and another inclined 30° with the same magnitude. Results: Stress concentrations on the IH implant are observed in the region of the first threads for the screw. However, in the MT implant the highest stress occurs at the edges of the upper implant platform. Conclusions: In view of the results obtained in this study the two types of prosthetic fittings present a good stress distribution. The Morse taper connections presented better behavior than the internal in both loading configurations.

scholarly journals Effect of Offset Implant Placement on the Stress Distribution Around a Dental Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 646-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakimeh Siadat ◽  
Shervin Hashemzadeh ◽  
Allahyar Geramy ◽  
Seyed Hossein Bassir ◽  
Marzieh Alikhasi
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Concentration ◽  
Stress Distribution ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
3D Finite Element ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Mandibular Molar

There are some anatomical restrictions in which implants are not possible to be inserted in their conventional configuration. Offset placement of implants in relation to the prosthetic unit could be a treatment solution. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the offset placement of implant-supported prosthesis on the stress distribution around a dental implant using 3D finite element analysis. 3D finite element models of implant placement in the position of a mandibular molar with 4 configurations (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 mm offset) were created in order to investigate resultant stress/strain distribution. A vertical load of 100 N was applied on the center of the crown of the models. The least stress in peri-implant tissue was found in in-line configuration (0 mm offset). Stress concentration in the peri-implant tissue increased by increasing the amount of offset placement. Maximum stress concentration in all models was detected at the neck of the implant. It can be concluded that the offset placement of a single dental implant does not offer biomechanical advantages regarding reducing stress concentration over the in-line implant configuration. It is suggested that the amount of offset should be as minimum as possible.

scholarly journals Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Single Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Bone Anchorages

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fellippo Ramos Verri ◽  
Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior ◽  
Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida ◽  
Ana Caroline Gonçales Verri ◽  
Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Concentration ◽  
Anterior Region ◽  
Bone Block ◽  
Apical Region ◽  
Stress Concentrations ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Biomechanical Behavior ◽  
Nasal Floor

The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution of monocortical and bicortical implant placement of external hexagon connection in the anterior region of the maxilla by 3D finite element analysis (FEA). 3D models were simulated to represent a bone block of anterior region of the maxilla containing an implant (4.0 × 10.0 mm) and an implant-supported cemented metalloceramic crown of the central incisor. Different techniques were tested (monocortical, bicortical, and bicortical associated with nasal floor elevation). FEA was performed in FEMAP/NeiNastran software using loads of 178 N at 0°, 30°, and 60° in relation to implant long axis. The von Mises, maximum principal stress, and displacement maps were plotted for evaluation. Similar stress patterns were observed for all models. Oblique loads increased the stress concentration on fixation screws and in the cervical area of the implants and bone around them. Bicortical technique showed less movement tendency in the implant and its components. Cortical bone of apical region showed increase of stress concentration for bicortical techniques. Within the limitations of this study, oblique loading increased the stress concentrations for all techniques. Moreover, bicortical techniques showed the best biomechanical behavior compared with monocortical technique in the anterior maxillary area.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document