CFD Modelling of Underground Coal Gasification using ANSYS Fluent Simulator

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (07) ◽  
pp. 505-519
Author(s):  
Devansh Shrivastava

Underground Coal Gasification is a non-traditional, in-situ combustion process for converting coal into product gases. In this process coal is combusted and the produced syngas which basically contains CO2, H2, CO and CH4 is extracted to the surface with the help of drilled wells. In this study, with reference to a lab-scaled UCG experiment [1] and taking the experimental data as the basis for the research a two dimensional CFD reactor model was created and further studies were done to establish the activity at the different locations of the reactor.

Author(s):  
Mansour Al Qubeissi ◽  
Nawar Al-Esawi ◽  
Hakan Serhad Soyhan

The previously developed models for fuel droplet heating and evaporation processes, mainly the Discrete Multi Component Model (DMCM), and Multi-Dimensional Quasi-Discrete Model (MDQDM) are investigated for the aerodynamic combustion simulation. The models have been recently improved, and generalised for a broad range of bio-fossil fuel blends so that the application areas are broadened with increased accuracy. The main distinctive features of these models are that they consider the impacts of species thermal conductivities and diffusivities within the droplets to account for the temperature gradient, transient diffusion of species and recirculation. A formulation of fuel surrogates is made, using the recently introduced model, referred to as ‘’Complex Fuel Surrogate Model (CFSM)’’ and analysing their heating, evaporation, and combustion characteristics. The CFSM is aimed to reduce the full composition of fuel to a much smaller number of components based on their mass fractions, and to formulate fuel surrogates. Such approach has provided a proof of concept with the implementation of the developed model into a commercial CFD code ANSYS-Fluent. A case study is made for the CFD modelling of gas-turbine engine using kerosene fuel surrogate. The surrogate is proposed using the CFSM. The model is implemented into ANSYS-Fluent via a user-defined function to provide the first full simulation of the combustion process. Detailed chemical mechanism is also implemented into ANSYS Chemkin for the combustion study.


2020 ◽  
Vol 187 ◽  
pp. 106770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengdong Yuan ◽  
Mikhail A. Varfolomeev ◽  
Artashes A. Khachatrian

1980 ◽  
Vol 20 (04) ◽  
pp. 267-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Gunn ◽  
William B. Krantz

Abstract A linear stability analysis shows that reverse combustion in coal and tar sands is only conditionally stable for mobility ratios less than one. However, high air-flow rates and gas generation at the combustion front can be stabilizing influences. For unstable operation, an estimate of the size of the reverse combustion channel may be obtained from the curve for the most highly amplified wave length. This provides a method for calculating the air flux, combustion front velocity, and rate of progress of the burn front. Recently the U.S. DOE Laramie Energy Technology Center (LETC) and Sandia Laboratories obtained experimental data about reverse combustion from a field test of in-situ coal gasification at Hanna, WY. These data show that 9.7 days were required for the development of a reverse combustion path 68 to 70 ft in length. The stability theory developed in this work predicts a length of 64 ft for this same 9.7-day period. In addition to quantitative predictions, stability theory provides an explanation of certain puzzling qualitative observations concerning reverse combustion. Introduction In-situ combustion is a potentially useful method for recovering fossil fuels from underground deposits. A number of in-situ combustion field tests have been conducted in oil reservoirs, tar sands, oil shale deposits, and coal seams. In-situ combustion can be classified into two broad categories: reverse combustion, in which the reaction front travels countercurrent to the flow of air, and forward combustion, in which the reaction zone travels in the same direction as the flow of air. Reverse combustion is especially important for coal and tar sands. During forward combustion, tars vaporized at the flame front in either coal or tar sands travel by convection into cooler regions ahead of the reaction zone where they condense and subsequently reduce the natural permeability of the fuel bed. In reverse combustion, vaporized tars or other high-molecular-weight compounds generated in the reaction zone travel toward the production well through a heated area already contacted by the high temperatures of the combustion front. As an added advantage, reverse combustion in tar sands substantially increases the relative permeability to gas. In lignite and subbituminous coal, drying and partial combustion typically increase the effective permeability to gas by four orders of magnitude. However, bituminous coal frequently swells on heating, and the net effect of reverse combustion on the permeability of swelling coals has not been investigated thoroughly. In coal and tar sands, reverse combustion is primarily a coking or carbonization process - i.e., the volatile components of the tar or coal are partially combusted while most of the carbon or coke is left unburned. For these reasons, reverse combustion represents an important part of some in-situ combustion methods currently being investigated for tar sands and coal. In the linked vertical well process for in-situ coal gasification, reverse combustion is used first to develop a high-permeability path between the production and air injection wells, while in the second stage of the process forward gasification or combustion is used as the major gas production method. Both industrial companies and government laboratories have investigated the linked vertical well process. For tar sands, the LETC is considering the use of reverse combustion as a preparatory mechanism similar to that used in coal.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Cavanzo ◽  
S. F. Muñoz ◽  
A.. Ordoñez ◽  
H.. Bottia

Abstract In Situ Combustion is an enhanced oil recovery method which consists on injecting air to the reservoir, generating a series of oxidation reactions at different temperature ranges by chemical interaction between oil and oxygen, the high temperature oxidation reactions are highly exothermic; the oxygen reacts with a coke like material formed by thermal cracking, they are responsible of generating the heat necessary to sustain and propagate the combustion front, sweeping the heavy oil and upgrading it due to the high temperatures. Wet in situ combustion is variant of the process, in which water is injected simultaneously or alternated with air, taking advantage of its high heat capacity, so the steam can transport heat more efficiently forward the combustion front due to the latent heat of vaporization. A representative model of the in situ combustion process is constituted by a static model, a dynamic model and a kinetic model. The kinetic model represents the oxidative behavior and the compositional changes of the crude oil; it is integrated by the most representative reactions of the process and the corresponding kinetic parameters of each reaction. Frequently, the kinetic model for a dry combustion process has Low Temperature Oxidation reactions (LTO), thermal cracking reactions and the combustion reaction. For the case of wet combustion, additional aquathermolysis reactions take place. This article presents a full review of the kinetic models of the wet in situ combustion process taking into account aquathermolysis reactions. These are hydrogen addition reactions due to the chemical interaction between crude oil and steam. The mechanism begins with desulphurization reactions and subsequent decarboxylation reactions, which are responsible of carbon monoxide production, which reacts with steam producing carbon dioxide and hydrogen; this is the water and gas shift reaction. Finally, during hydrocracking and hydrodesulphurization reactions, hydrogen sulfide is generated and the crude oil is upgraded. An additional upgrading mechanism during the wet in situ combustion process can be explained by the aquathermolysis theory, also hydrogen sulphide and hydrogen production can be estimated by a suitable kinetic model that takes into account the most representative reactions involved during the combustion process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document