AbstractBackground:Acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhotic patients may be functional (hepatorenal syndrome [HRS]) or structural (acute tubular necrosis [ATN]). The differentiation between these two conditions remains challenging; no definite biomarker with a clear cutoff value had been declared. miRNAs seem to be attractive innovative biomarkers to identify the nature of kidney injury in cirrhotic patients. This study aimed to investigate the possibility of using miR-21, miR-210 and miR-146a as differentiating markers between HRS and ATN.Methods:This pilot case control study included 50 patients with liver cirrhosis; 25 with HRS and another 25 with ATN beside 30 healthy controls. Real-time qPCR was used to measure the circulating miRNA tested.Results:Higher levels of miR-21 were observed in both ATN and HRS vs. controls with statistically significant difference between ATN and HRS. The means were 9.466±3.21 in ATN, 2.670±1.387 in HRS and 1.090±0.586 in controls. miR-146a and miR-210 were both significantly lower in ATN and HRS compared to controls with statistically significant differences between ATN and HRS. The means of miR-210 were 1.020±0.643, 1.640±0.605 and 3.0±0.532 in ATN, HRS and controls, respectively. The means of miR-146a were 2.543±1.929, 4.98±1.353 and 6.553±0.426 in ATN, HRS and controls, respectively. ROC analyses proved that the three studied mi-RNAs can be used as differentiating biomarkers between ATN and HRS with the best performance observed with mi-21 achieving specificity and sensitivity equal 96%.Conclusions:miR-21, miR-210 and miR-146a may be candidate differentiating markers between HRS and ATN in cirrhotic patients.
Biopsy Proven Acute Tubular Necrosis Associated with Vancomycin in a Child: Case Report and Literature Review
