Retrospective Study on the Use of Infliximab and Adalimumab Drug and Antibody Levels for Clinical Decision Making in IBD Patients at a University-Based Single-Center Practice

2015 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. S833
Author(s):  
Sarah Flores ◽  
Kareem Sassi ◽  
Nimisha Parekh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Antibody Levels

scholarly journals A radiomics model that predicts lymph node status in pancreatic cancer to guide clinical decision making: A retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 6050-6057
Author(s):  
Xiaoyuan Liang ◽  
Wei Cai ◽  
Xingyu Liu ◽  
Ming Jin ◽  
Lingxiang Ruan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Node Status

Statistical analysis of pathologic risk factors for intramyometrial lymphvascular space involvement in myoinvasive endometrial carcinoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1330-1335 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. H. Honorè ◽  
J. Hanson
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Relative Risks

In a retrospective study using univariate analysis, we identified tumor type (nonendometrioid vs endometrioid), depth of myoinvasion (MI), mode of MI (infiltrative vs cohesive), and direct anatomic invasion of the cervical wall from the isthmus as significant positive risk factors for intramyometrial lymphvascular space involvement (LVSI). On multivariate analysis, tumor grade, depth of MI, and mode of MI retained their significance. We created a grid for the relative risks of LVSI with respect to these variables individually or in combination. We suggest that our indirect estimate of the risk of LVSI can help in assessing prognosis and determining the need for adjuvant therapy whenever LVSI is important in clinical decision making, but its pathologic diagnosis is uncertain.

Debates in Dysphagia Management: How Do You Use Evidence-Based Practice in Your Dysphagia Patient Care?

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
Jeri A. Logemann
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Method ◽  
Do So

Evidence-based practice requires astute clinicians to blend our best clinical judgment with the best available external evidence and the patient's own values and expectations. Sometimes, we value one more than another during clinical decision-making, though it is never wise to do so, and sometimes other factors that we are unaware of produce unanticipated clinical outcomes. Sometimes, we feel very strongly about one clinical method or another, and hopefully that belief is founded in evidence. Some beliefs, however, are not founded in evidence. The sound use of evidence is the best way to navigate the debates within our field of practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document