Utility of HIDA Scan in Predicting Outcome of Cholecystectomy in Patients With Chronic Acalculous Gallbladder Disease? A Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. S2-S3
Author(s):  
Nazar Hafiz ◽  
Seth D. Crockett
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Gallbladder Disease ◽  
Hida Scan ◽  
Predicting Outcome

Safety of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: a systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 4716-4727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Migliore ◽  
Alberto Arezzo ◽  
Simone Arolfo ◽  
Roberto Passera ◽  
Mario Morino
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Gallbladder Disease ◽  
Robotic Cholecystectomy

Limitations in predicting outcome following primary ACL reconstruction with single-bundle hamstring autograft — A systematic review

The Knee ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent VG An ◽  
Corey Scholes ◽  
Vikram A Mhaskar ◽  
William J Hadden ◽  
David Parker
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Hamstring Autograft ◽  
Predicting Outcome ◽  
Primary Acl Reconstruction

Systematic review of management of gallbladder disease in patients undergoing minimally invasive bariatric surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adolfo Leyva-Alvizo ◽  
Gabriela Arredondo-Saldaña ◽  
Valeria Leal-Isla-Flores ◽  
John Romanelli ◽  
Ranjan Sudan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Gallbladder Disease

scholarly journals Physical performance measures for predicting outcome in cancer patients: a systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 1386-1391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert M. Verweij ◽  
Anandi H. W. Schiphorst ◽  
Apollo Pronk ◽  
Frederiek van den Bos ◽  
Marije E. Hamaker
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Physical Performance ◽  
Performance Measures ◽  
Predicting Outcome

scholarly journals Physical prognostic factors predicting outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: protocol for a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e033429
Author(s):  
Andrew Middlebrook ◽  
Sheree Bekker ◽  
Nicola Middlebrook ◽  
Alison B Rushton
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Predicting Outcome ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

IntroductionInjuries of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are a common musculoskeletal complication and can cause significant reduction in patient function and quality of life. Many undergo ACL reconstruction, with high-quality rehabilitation key to successful outcome. Knowledge of physical prognostic factors, such as quadriceps strength, is crucial to inform rehabilitation and has important implications for outcome following ACL reconstruction. However, these factors predicting outcome are poorly defined. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to establish physical prognostic factors predictive of outcome in adults following ACL reconstruction. Outcome will be subdivided into two groups of outcome measures, patient-reported and performance-based. Physical prognostic factors of interest will reflect a range of domains and may be modifiable/non-modifiable. Results will help decide most appropriate management and assist in planning and tailoring preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation.Methods and analysisThis systematic review protocol is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE databases, key journals and grey literature will be searched from inception to July 2019. Prospective cohort studies including participants aged ≥16 years who have undergone ACL reconstruction will be included, with articles focusing on multi-ligament reconstructions and ACL repair surgery, or not published in English excluded. Two independent reviewers will conduct searches, assess study eligibility, extract data, assess risk of bias (Quality in Prognostic Studies tool) and quantify overall quality of evidence (modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines). If possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted, otherwise a narrative synthesis will ensue focusing on prognostic factors, risk of bias of included studies and strength of association with outcomes.Ethics and disseminationFindings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at conferences and locally to physiotherapy departments. Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019127732.

ALBI versus child-pugh in predicting outcome of patients with HCC: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 383-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Peng ◽  
Qinglin Wei ◽  
Yonghong He ◽  
Qiaoling Xie ◽  
Yanchao Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Predicting Outcome
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document