scholarly journals S1727 A Rare Presentation of Colon Cancer Presenting as a Pseudomonas Intraabdominal Abscess With Perforation and Fluid Collection Post Tumor Resection

2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. S767-S768
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ansari ◽  
Manjot Malhi ◽  
Akiva J. Marcus
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitsugu Yanagida ◽  
Takahiro Amano ◽  
Ryuji Akai ◽  
Akira Toyoshima ◽  
Jotaro Kobayashi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Tumor thrombus in the superior mesenteric vein secondary to colon cancer is rare. We report a case of tumor thrombus in the superior mesenteric vein and liver metastasis due to advanced colon cancer that was treated with chemotherapy and complete surgical resection. Case presentation A 72-year-old man after transverse colectomy with lymph node dissection for advanced colon cancer was diagnosed with tumor thrombus in the superior mesenteric vein and liver metastasis. He underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and had complete surgical tumor resection involving tumor thrombectomy and hepatectomy. There has been no recurrence at 36 months after surgery. Conclusion Herein, we report a rare case of tumor thrombus in the superior mesenteric vein related to advanced colon cancer. The combination of chemotherapy and complete surgical tumor resection may provide long-term survival.


Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 123 (7) ◽  
pp. 1124-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeinab Alawadi ◽  
Uma R. Phatak ◽  
Chung-Yuan Hu ◽  
Christina E. Bailey ◽  
Y. Nancy You ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Chukwunonso Chime ◽  
Madhavi Ravi ◽  
Myrta Daniel ◽  
Harish Patel ◽  
Bhavna Balar

Gastrocolic fistulae have been described for benign conditions including penetrating peptic ulcer and complicated pancreatitis. Malignant etiology can arise from gastric or colon cancer and is a rare and late complication with an incidence of 0.3-0.4%. Usual presentation is the classic triad of weight loss, diarrhea, and feculent vomiting. Barium enema has been shown to have the highest diagnostic accuracy but endoscopy offers additional advantage of biopsy to aid in diagnosis of malignant etiology; the role of computed tomography (CT) scan is controversial. Treatment by one-stage en bloc surgical approach is the current acceptable standard of care with variable recurrence and survival rates. Adjuvant chemotherapy would be based on lymph node involvement and patient discussion.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 878-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Redston ◽  
Carolyn C. Compton ◽  
Brent W. Miedema ◽  
Donna Niedzwiecki ◽  
Jeannette M. Dowell ◽  
...  

Purpose To determine whether sentinel lymph node (LN) sampling (SLNS) could reduce the number of nodes required to characterize micrometastatic disease (MMD) in patients with potentially curable colon cancer. Patients and Methods Cancer and Leukemia Group B 80001 was a study to determine whether SLNS could identify a subset of LNs that predicted the status of the nodal basin for resectable colon cancer and, therefore, could be extensively evaluated for the presence of micrometastases. Patients enrolled onto this study underwent SLNS after injection of 1% isosulfan blue, and both sentinel nodes (SNs) and non-SNs obtained during primary tumor resection were sectioned at multiple levels and stained using anti–carcinoembryonic antigen and anticytokeratin antibodies. Results Using standard histopathology, SNs failed to predict the presence of nodal disease in 13 (54%) of 24 node-positive patients. Immunostains were performed for patients whose LNs were negative by standard histopathology. Depending on the immunohistochemical criteria used to assign LN positivity, SN examination resulted in either an unacceptably high false-positive rate (20%) or a low sensitivity for detection of MMD (40%). Conclusion By examining both SNs and non-SNs, this multi-institutional study showed that SNs did not accurately predict the presence of either conventionally defined nodal metastases or MMD. As a result, SLNS is not a useful technique for the study of MMD in patients with colon cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 674-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeinab Alawadi ◽  
Uma Phatak ◽  
Chung-Yuan Hu ◽  
Christina Edwards Bailey ◽  
Lillian Kao ◽  
...  

674 Background: Although the safety of chemotherapy without primary tumor resection (PTR) has been established, questions remain regarding potential survival benefit with PTR. The purpose of this study was to compare mortality with and without PTR among patients with unresectable metastatic colon cancer using nationwide hospital based cancer registry data. Methods: An observational study was conducted of patients with stage 4 colon cancer identified from the National Cancer Data Base (2003-2005). Patients who underwent metastectomy were excluded. Patient, treatment, and hospital data were analyzed. Multivariate Cox regression stratified by receipt of chemotherapy was performed to compare survival with and without PTR. To account for treatment selection bias, Propensity Score Weighting (PSW) and Instrumental Variable (IV) analyses, using hospital-level PTR rate as the instrument, were performed. In order to account for the potential bias associated with early comorbidity or disease burden associated deaths (survivor treatment bias), 1 year landmark analysis was performed. Results: A total of 14,399 patients met inclusion criteria and 6,735 patients were eligible for landmark analysis. PTR was performed in 38.2% of the total cohort and 73.8% of those at landmark. Using multivariate Cox regression analysis, PTR was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (HR 0.39; 95% CI, 0.38-0.41). This effect persisted with PSW (HR 0.4; 95% CI, 0.38-0.43). However, IV analysis showed a much smaller effect, (RR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93). While a smaller benefit was seen on landmark analysis using multivariate Cox regression (HR 0.6; 95% CI, 0.55-0.64) and PSW (HR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.54-0.64), IV analysis showed no improvement in survival with PTR (RR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.87-1.06). Stratification by chemotherapy did not alter the results. Conclusions: Among patients with stage IV colon cancer, PTR offered no survival benefit over systemic chemotherapy alone when the IV method was applied at the 1 year landmark. Subject to selection and survivor treatment bias, standard regression analysis may overestimate the benefit of PTR. Future study should focus on identifying patients most likely to benefit from PTR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document