Self-Repair Lab

2021 ◽  
pp. 247-251
Author(s):  
Mindaugas Gapševicius
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerio Di Nicola ◽  
Renato Di Nicola

2021 ◽  
pp. 030631272110109
Author(s):  
Ole Pütz

The formulation of computer algorithms requires the elimination of vagueness. This elimination of vagueness requires exactness in programming, and this exactness can be traced to meeting talk, where it intersects with the indexicality of expressions. This article is concerned with sequences in which a team of computer scientists discuss the functionality of prototypes that are already implemented or possibly to be implemented. The analysis focuses on self-repair because this is a practice where participants can be seen to orient to meanings of different expressions as alternatives. By using self-repair, the computer scientists show a concern with exact descriptions when they talk about existing functionality of their prototypes but not when they talk about potential future functionality. Instead, when participants talk about potential future functionality and attend to meanings during self-repair, they use vague expressions to indicate possibilities. Furthermore, when the computer scientists talk to external stakeholders, they indicate through hedges whenever their descriptions approximate already implemented technical functionality but do not describe it exactly. The article considers whether the code of working prototypes can be said to fix meanings of expressions and how we may account for human agency and non-human resistances during development.


1986 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin A. Silverman ◽  
Norman P. Will
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Yu-Ying Hsiao ◽  
Chao-Hsun Chen ◽  
Cheng-Wen Wu
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 209 (6) ◽  
pp. 517-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rose McCabe ◽  
Paula John ◽  
Jemima Dooley ◽  
Patrick Healey ◽  
Annie Cushing ◽  
...  

BackgroundA better therapeutic relationship predicts better outcomes. However, there is no trial-based evidence on how to improve therapeutic relationships in psychosis.AimsTo test the effectiveness of communication training for psychiatrists on improving shared understanding and the therapeutic relationship (trial registration: ISRCTN94846422).MethodIn a cluster randomised controlled trial in the UK, 21 psychiatrists were randomised. Ninety-seven (51% of those approached) out-patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder were recruited, and 64 (66% of the sample recruited at baseline) were followed up after 5 months. The intervention group received four group and one individualised session. The primary outcome, rated blind, was psychiatrist effort in establishing shared understanding (self-repair). Secondary outcome was the therapeutic relationship.ResultsPsychiatrists receiving the intervention used 44% more self-repair than the control group (adjusted difference in means 6.4, 95% CI 1.46–11.33, P<0.011, a large effect) adjusting for baseline self-repair. Psychiatrists rated the therapeutic relationship more positively (adjusted difference in means 0.20, 95% CI 0.03–0.37, P = 0.022, a medium effect), as did patients (adjusted difference in means 0.21, 95% CI 0.01–0.41, P = 0.043, a medium effect).ConclusionsShared understanding can be successfully targeted in training and improves relationships in treating psychosis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rei-Fu Huang ◽  
Chao-Hsun Chen ◽  
Cheng-Wen Wu
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document