scholarly journals Left Brachiocephalic Vein Cannulation in Bicaval Venous Drainage Is Safe, Effective, and Technically Advantageous

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-147
Author(s):  
Mathias Hossain Aazami ◽  
Arash Gholoobi ◽  
Shahram Amini ◽  
Alireza Abdollahi-Moghadam ◽  
Ghassem Soltani
Keyword(s):  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Venous Drainage ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Brachiocephalic Vein ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Left Brachiocephalic Vein ◽  
Venae Cavae ◽  
The Mean

Direct cannulation of both venae cavae (bicaval venous cannulation) is the gold standard for right atrial isolation in intracavitary surgery, but there has been no consensus about an alternative site. Therefore, we studied an alternative method for bicaval venous drainage in which the left brachiocephalic vein (LBCV) is cannulated instead of the superior vena cava. From 2012 through 2014, we performed routine LBCV cannulation in 150 consecutive patients as part of bicaval venous drainage before right atrial isolation. We prospectively collected demographic information, operative data, total pump and LBCV cannula flows with their respective calculated and indexed rates, central venous pressures, and perioperative complications. All patients survived surgery. There were no adverse technical outcomes or functional deficits associated with the technique. The mean indexed LBCV cannula flow was 1,520 ± 216 mL/min/m2, representing an LBCV cannula-to-calculated pump-flow ratio of 64%. The mean central venous pressure during right atrial isolation was 3.7 ± 1.9 mmHg. Cannulation of the LBCV is intrinsically a safe and reproducible procedure with proven hemodynamic adequacy. Its versatility can be an asset to surgical techniques and perfusion methods. Furthermore, the hemodynamic results in our series promise alternative intrathoracic and extracardiac cannulation sites for mini-extracorporeal circulation, on-pump beating-heart procedures, and short-term circulatory assist device implementation.

A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY TO ASSESS CORRELATION OF CAVAL AORTA INDEX WITH CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE FOR INTRAVASCULAR VOLUME ASSESSMENT IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ENDOSCOPIC TRANSURETHERAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE (TURP)

2021 ◽  
pp. 10-12
Author(s):  
N. Senthil kumar ◽  
Jeya Pratheef Muthiah
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Volume Status ◽  
Intravascular Volume ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Sonographic Evaluation ◽  
Volume Assessment ◽  
The Mean

INTRODUCTION: There are various techniques for assessing the uid status such as clinical examination, central venous pressure (CVP) measurement, biochemical markers, bio impedance, continuous blood volume measurement, or sonographic inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter assessment. Sonographic evaluation of the IVC and Aorta diameter and its usefulness in evaluating the volume status are studied and documented. The sonographic evaluation of the IVC & Aorta can predict the volume status, this tool can assist anesthetist in rapid diagnosis and prompt resuscitation of patients developing TURP syndrome AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim & objective of this study is to assess the correlation of Caval Aorta index with CVP in intravascular volume assessment in patients undergoing endoscopic Trans Urethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study is carried out in the Department of Anaesthesiology involving Department of Urology in Kanyakumari Government Medical College from January 2018 to June 2019. It is a Prospective observational study. To measure the IVC diameter USG machine probe is placed in the sub-xiphoid region to visualize the conuence of the hepatic veins draining the IVC. The maximum internal AP diameter of the Aorta(Ao) and maximum internal anterior-posterior (AP) diameter of the IVC is measured in the longitudinal plane. Fluid status will be measured by CVP and IVC/Ao index recorded before neuraxial block, after preload, at 5 min after intrathecal block, resection time at 0 min, every 15 min during the rst 30 min, then every 30 min, until the end of surgery. Outcome: Incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in a cesarean section RESULTS: The mean IVC diameter at pre-operative is 15.20±1.42, and at 60 min, 75 min were 19.39±1.92, 20.03±1.76 which suggests that the size and shape of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is correlated to the CVP and circulating blood volume. In my study the mean Aortic diameter at 60 min, 75 min were 20.30±1.01 and 19.81±1.06 which is same as the preoperative level (19.72±1.18) and diameter. The mean CVP at pre-operative is 4.57±0.73, mean CVP at 60 min, 75 min were 7.57±0.82, 8.11±0.78 which denotes that CVP increases as the intravascular volume status increases. In our study mean IVC/Aortic index at pre-operative is 0.77±0.05 and the mean IVC/Aortic index at 15min, 30 min, 60 min, 75 min were 0.87±0.03, 0.90±0.04, 0.95±0.06, 1.01±0.05 which increases signicantly in increasing intravascular volume. The strong correlation between these two variable with Pearson formula ranging from 0.450-0.900. CONCLUSION: As Sonographic caval Ao index is very well correlated with CVP , IVC/Ao index is useful for the evaluation of preoperative and intraoperative volume status, especially in major surgeries with marked uid shift or blood loss and had the advantage of being noninvasive, safe, quick, and easy technique with no complications.

Accuracy of Central Venous Pressure Measuremet From the Abdominal Inferior Vena Cava

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 506-508
Author(s):  
THOMAS R. LLOYD ◽  
RICHARD L. DONNERSTEIN ◽  
ROBERT A. BERG
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Vena Cava ◽  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Right Atrium ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Right

Central venous pressure measurements in the abdominal inferior vena cava were compared with measurements in the right atrium in 10 infants and 10 children during cardiac catheterization. At end expiration, the mean pressures at these two sites were within 1 mm Hg of each other in all 20 patients, with a mean difference of 0.0 ± 0.36 mm Hg. The abdominal inferior vena cava is a safe and convenient site for measurement of central venous pressure, and our study confirms that such measurements are accurate.

Caveats on Abdominal Central Venous Pressure Measurement

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 479-479
Author(s):  
THOMAS R. LLOYD ◽  
RICHARD L. DONNERSTEIN ◽  
ROBERT A. BERG
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Vena Cava ◽  
Pressure Measurement ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Intraperitoneal Pressure ◽  
Extrinsic Compression

In Reply.— We appreciate Dr Tong's kind comments on our study. As we stated, "Abdominal vena cava pressure may be significantly higher than right atrial pressure...(in) patients with extrinsic compression of the inferior vena cava," and this may well occur in patients with severely elevated intraperitoneal pressure due to the presence of fluid or air. It is worth pointing out that the same caveat applies to intrathoracic venous pressure measurement in the presence of extrinsic compression of the superior vena cava or right atrium (eg, by pneumomediastinum).

scholarly journals Caval Aorta Index and Central Venous Pressure Correlation in Assessing Fluid Status! “Ultrasound Bridging the Gap”

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harshitha Sridhar ◽  
Pavan Mangalore ◽  
V. P. Chandrasekaran ◽  
Rishya Manikam
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Body Fluid ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Fluid Status ◽  
The Mean

Accurate body fluid assessment and estimation of fluid status are essential in guiding fluid therapy in emergency setup. This prospective cross-sectional descriptive study conducted to ascertain the effectiveness of inferior vena cava and aorta (IVC/Aorta) index in assessing the fluid status by comparing it with the central venous pressure (CVP). Results showed the mean IVC/Aorta index in patients who had normal CVP range was 1.2 ± 0.12 SD, while in patients with low CVP, the mean index was 0.7 ± 0.09 SD, and, patients with high CVP, the mean index was 1.6 ± 0.05 SD. In conclusion, the sonographic IVC/Aorta index assessment seems to be a quick, simple, noninvasive, and reliable method to access the fluid status in a busy setup like an emergency room.

Central venous pressure monitoring in critical care settings

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 230-236
Author(s):  
Barry Hill ◽  
Catherine Smith
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Right Atrium ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Haemodynamic Monitoring ◽  
Haemodynamic Instability ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
The Right

Patients who present with acute cardiovascular compromise require haemodynamic monitoring in a critical care unit. Central venous pressure (CVP) is the most frequently used measure to guide fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. It is most often done via a central venous catheter (CVC) positioned in the right atrium or superior or inferior vena cava as close to the right atrium as possible. The CVC is inserted via the internal jugular vein, subclavian vein or via the femoral vein, depending on the patient and their condition. Complications of CVC placement can be serious, so its risks and benefits need to be considered. Alternative methods to CVC use include transpulmonary thermodilution and transoesophageal Doppler ultrasound. Despite its widespread use, CVP has been challenged in many studies, which have reported it to be a poor predictor of haemodynamic responsiveness. However, it is argued that CVP monitoring provides important physiologic information for the evaluation of haemodynamic instability. Nurses have central roles during catheter insertion and in CVP monitoring, as well as in managing these patients and assessing risks.

Effect of hypoxic hypoxia on systemic vasculature

1984 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 1403-1410 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Malo ◽  
H. Goldberg ◽  
R. Graham ◽  
H. Unruh ◽  
C. Skoog
Keyword(s):  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Venous Drainage ◽  
Hypoxic Hypoxia ◽  
Venous Compliance ◽  
Flow Curves ◽  
Pressure Flow

Effects of hypoxic hypoxia (HH) on cardiac output (CO), CO distribution, arterial and venous pressure-flow curves, vascular compliance, vascular time constant (tau), and resistance to venous return (RVR) were evaluated on six dogs. The vascular bed was isolated into four compartments depending on venous drainage: superior vena cava (SVC), splanchnic, renal and adrenal, and the remainder of the inferior vena cava (IVC). Low arterial O2 content and PO2 produced a threefold increase in CO at the same mean arterial pressure and a significant redistribution of CO to the SVC. Arterial pressure-flow curves decreased their slope (i.e., flow resistance) by a factor of two in the IVC and renal beds and by a factor of three in the splanchnic and SVC beds. Venous pressure-flow curves for the animal also decreased their slope significantly. HH causes a twofold increase in venous compliance and in mean venous pressure; tau did not change, but RVR halved. Seventy percent of the CO increase is explained by the increase in mean venous pressure and 30% by the reduction in RVR.

Systemic filling pressure in intact circulation determined on basis of aortic vs. central venous pressure relationships

1994 ◽  
Vol 267 (6) ◽  
pp. H2255-H2258 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Den Hartog ◽  
A. Versprille ◽  
J. R. Jansen
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Flow Resistance ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Aortic Pressure ◽  
Filling Pressure ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Mean Systemic Filling Pressure ◽  
Systemic Filling ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Systemic Filling Pressure

In the intact circulation, mean systemic filling pressure (Psf) is determined by applying a series of inspiratory pause procedures (IPPs) and using Guyton's equation of venous return (Qv) and central venous pressure (Pcv): Qv = a - b x Pcv. During an IPP series, different tidal volumes are applied to set Pcv at different values. From the linear regression between Qv and Pcv, Psf can be calculated as Psf = a/b. Guyton's equation can also be written as Qv = (Psf - Pcv)/Rsd, where Rsd is the flow resistance downstream of the places where blood pressure is equal to Psf. During an IPP, a steady state is observed. Therefore, we can also formulate the following equation for flow: Qs = (Pao - Psf)/Rsu, where Qs is systemic flow, Rsu is the systemic flow resistance upstream to Psf, and Pao is aortic pressure. Because both flows (Qs and Qv) are equal, it follows that Pao = Psf(1 + Rsu/Rsd) - Rsu/Rsd x Pcv. This equation implies a method to determine mean systemic filling pressure on the basis of Pao measurements instead of flow determinations. Using 22 IPPs in 10 piglets, we determined the mean systemic filling pressure, and we compared the values obtained from the flow curves with those obtained from the aortic pressure curves. The mean difference between the two methods was 0.03 +/- 1.16 mmHg. With the use of Pao measurements, the Psf can be estimated as accurately as in using flow determinations. The advantage of the new method is that estimation of cardiac output is not required.

scholarly journals Respiratory variation of inferior vena cava diameter and central venous pressure in ventilated and non-ventilated children in fluid refractory septic shock: an observational study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1947
Author(s):  
Mohd Kashif Ali ◽  
Eeman Naim
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Inferior Vena Cava ◽  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Spontaneously Breathing ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Background: Ultrasound guided fluid assessment in management of septic shock has come up as an adjunct to the current gold standard Central Venous Pressure monitoring. This study was designed to observe the respiro-phasic variation of IVC diameter (RV-IVCD) in invasively mechanically ventilated and spontaneously breathing paediatric patients of fluid refractory septic shock.Methods: This was a prospective observational study done at Paediatric intensive Care Unit (PICU) in Paediatric ward of Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital (JNMCH) from February 2016 to June 2017. 107 consecutive patients between 1 year to 16 years age who were in shock despite 40ml/kg of fluid administration were included. Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) diameters were measured at end-expiration and end inspiration and the IVC collapsibility index was calculated. Simultaneously Central Venous Pressure (CVP) was recorded. Both values were obtained in ventilated and non-ventilated patients. Data was analysed to determine to look for the profile of RV-IVCD and CVP in ventilated and non-ventilated cases.Results: Out of 107 patients, 91 were on invasive mechanical ventilation and 16 patients were spontaneously breathing. There was a strong negative correlation between central venous pressure (CVP) and inferior vena cava collapsibility (RV-IVCD) in both spontaneously breathing (-0.810) and mechanically ventilated patients (-0.700). Negative correlation was significant in both study groups in CVP <8 mmHg and only in spontaneously breathing patients in CVP 8-12 mmHg range. IVC collapsibility showed a decreasing trend with rising CVP in both spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients.Conclusion: Ultrasonography guided IVCCI appears to be a valuable index in assessing fluid status in both spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated septic shock patients. However, more data is required from the paediatric population so as to define it as standard of practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document