scholarly journals In European social model comparison of legislation regarding in the European Union and regulation in Turkey of the disabled tourismSosyal Avrupa modeli çerçevesinde Avrupa Birliği’ndeki engelli turizmine ilişkin yasal düzenlemelerin Türkiye’deki yasal düzenlemelerle karşılaştırılması

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gülay Bulgan ◽  
Ümmühan Kaygısız

<p>In each period human rights are taken under constitutional and legal guarantees of the states. In this result of sensitivity shown by the state can benefit from any other individuals in accordance with the constitutional rights of equal opportunities in society. European Union legislation and has already been disabled in Turkey and are continuing to do, this legislation from the common point of all fundamental freedoms and human rights of people with disabilities constitute the full and equal benefit of this way. Taking the situation in this direction, of people with disabilities should be noted that not only a matter of common sense, but also a matter of rights and justice. In this context, all of the fundamental rights of the people to participate in tourism activities is of great importance for disabilities. Because of the various problems faced by people with disabilities can not participate adequately in social life. As part of efforts to increase the social participation of people with disabilities are being made arrangements in the field of accessible tourism. Conducted by this legislation, and adapt to the social life of people with disabilities is important both in terms of participation in tourism activities. In this study, people with disabilities tourism axis in the EU and Turkey are compared of the legislation disabled.<br />The aim of this study is comparison of findings obtained as a result of Turkey's tourism market with disabilities which is an important niche market position in the world and make suggestions to get more shares.</p><p><strong>Özet:</strong></p><p>İnsan hakları her dönemde devletlerin anayasal ve yasal güvence altına aldığı haklardır. Devletlerin gösterdiği bu hassasiyet sonucunda engelliler toplumdaki diğer bireylerle fırsat eşitliği doğrultusunda her türlü anayasal haktan yararlanabilmektedir. Avrupa Birliği’nde (AB) ve Türkiye’de engellilere yönelik yasal düzenlemeler hâlihazırda yapılmış ve yapılmaya devam etmekte olup bu yasal düzenlemelerin ortak noktasını tüm engelli insanların temel özgürlüklerden ve insan haklarından tam ve eşit bir şekilde faydalanması oluşturmaktadır.  Buradan yola çıkarak engelli bireylerin içinde bulunduğu durumun sadece bir sağduyu meselesi değil bir hak ve adalet meselesi olduğunu belirtmek gerekmektedir. Engellilerin, tüm insanların temel haklarından olan turizm faaliyetlerine katılması bu bağlamda da büyük önem taşımaktadır. Engelli insanlar karşılaştıkları çeşitli sorunlar yüzünden sosyal yaşama yeterli ölçüde katılamamaktadır. Engellilerin sosyal yaşama katılımını artırmaya yönelik çalışmaların bir parçası olarak erişilebilir turizm alanında düzenlemeler yapılmaktadır. Yapılan bu yasal düzenlemeler, hem engellilerin toplumsal hayata uyum sağlamaları hem de turizm faaliyetlerine katılmaları açısından oldukça önemlidir. Bu çalışmada engelli turizmi ekseninde AB’de ve Türkiye de engellilere yönelik yasal düzenlemeler karşılaştırılmaktadır.</p><p>Çalışmanın amacı yapılan karşılaştırma sonucunda elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda Türkiye’nin dünyada önemli bir Niş Pazar konumunda olan engelli turizm pazarından daha fazla pay alabilmesi için önerilerde bulunmaktır.</p><p><br /><br /></p>

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor D. Bojkov

This article is about national identity, political interest and the creation of international human rights regimes. Geographically, it is focused on Western Europe and the very recent process of establishing the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Both national identity and political interest are seen as important determinants of this process, defining its discourse and outcome. The relationship between the two is complex and recursive. They influence each other to an extent that warrants seeing them as mutually constitutive. On one hand, the social, political and economic projects elites engage in have to resonate positively with dearly held elements of national identity but have also the power to modify them. Being a psychological phenomenon, on the other hand, national identity is a dynamic concept that employs common historically defined memories, traditions and customs but is also subject to the influence of the political context within which it operates.


2021 ◽  
pp. 203228442199593
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Schomburg ◽  
Anna Oehmichen ◽  
Katrin Kayß

As human rights have increasingly gained importance at the European Union level, this article examines the remaining scope of human rights protection under the EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement. While some international human rights instruments remain applicable, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union did not become part of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA). The consequences, especially the inapplicability of the internationalised ne bis in idem principle, are analysed. Furthermore, the conditionality of the TCA in general as well as the specific conditionality for judicial cooperation in criminal matters are discussed. In this context, the risk that cooperation may cease at any moment if any Member State or the UK leave the European Convention of Human Rights is highlighted. Lastly, the authors raise the problem of the lack of judicial review, as the Court of Justice of the European Union is no longer competent.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-363
Author(s):  
Bjarney Friðriksdóttir

Abstract This case report provides an account of the issues addressed in the preliminary ruling of the CJEU in Martinez Silva vs. Italy. The case centres on the limitations Member States of the European Union are permitted to apply in granting third-country nationals in employment equal treatment with nationals in social security rights according to Directive 2011/98/EU (the Single Permit Directive). Additionally, the preliminary ruling of the Court is discussed is discussed in the context of the human rights principle of equal treatment as it is enshrined in EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and International Labour Law.


2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (9) ◽  
pp. 1840-1843
Author(s):  
Mariola Żuk

According to statistic reports the number of disabled people in the world is still increasing. Nowadays it’s estimated that one for six citizens in European Union is disabled. New laws are established to improve the social attitude towards the sick and the disabled. The perception of people with disabilities is widely dominated by their limitations that often take priority. Completely different social attitudes concern artists. They are admired. The aim of the paper is to discuss the extent to which the disabled people can contribute to the culture and to reflect on the importance of art for the rehabilitation process as well as for the social integration of artists with disabilities. The conclusion that it implies is, that the art for ages well serves the integration and rehabilitation cause.


Author(s):  
Katalin Ligeti

Since long before the entry into force of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFREU), the two highest courts in Europe, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) have sought to develop their respective jurisprudence in such a way as to ensure a strong protection of individual rights, whilst avoiding clashes between the decisions taken in Luxembourg and Strasbourg. An important statement in this regard is provided by the Bosphorus judgment, in which the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR recognised the existence of a presumption of equivalent protection of fundamental rights under EU law. The presumption is rebuttable, but expresses the trustful attitude (and a certain degree of deference) of Strasbourg towards the ability of EU law (and of the CJEU) to protect Convention rights.


Author(s):  
Bruno de Witte

This chapter retraces the post-enlargement trajectory of the protection of fundamental social rights in Europe. The chapter selects three years that signpost this trajectory: 2000, when the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights was adopted, with the inclusion of a social rights chapter; 2009, when the Lisbon Treaty seemed to contain a renewed promise of social progress in the Union; and 2017, when the European Union launched a European Pillar of Social Rights, as part of an effort to revitalize the social protection agenda of the European Union after the disappointing post-Lisbon years.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document