Moving Beyond Autologous Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Consolidation, Maintenance, Allogeneic Transplant, and Immune Therapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 210-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrita Krishnan ◽  
Ravi Vij ◽  
Jesse Keller ◽  
Binod Dhakal ◽  
Parameswaran Hari
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. S140-S142
Author(s):  
Michael R. Bishop

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 133-145
Author(s):  
E. V. Kryukov ◽  
V. N. Troyan ◽  
O. A. Rukavitsyn ◽  
S. A. Alekseev ◽  
S. I. Kurbanov ◽  
...  

The article presents the possibilities of the complex application of methods of radiation diagnostics: bone x-ray, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography, positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography using fluorodeoxyglucose labeled with 18-fluorine (PET/CT with 18F-FDG) in a patient with multiple myeloma, which was treated in the amount of high-dose therapy with autologous transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. The diagnosis was established immunohistochemically. The use of these methods allowed us to dynamically assess the pathological changes characteristic of multiple myeloma.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8052-TPS8052
Author(s):  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Zihan Wei ◽  
Michael A. Thompson ◽  
Bradley Snyder ◽  
Matthias Weiss ◽  
...  

TPS8052 Background: The monoclonal antibody (MoAb) daratumumab (dara) has been approved for treatment of newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) in combination with lenalidomide (len) and dexamethasone (DRd) in patients who are not eligible to undergo stem cell transplantation (SCT). Ongoing trials are examining the role of adding bortezomib (Btz) to DRd, but it remains unclear if all patients benefit from a quadruplet regimen. Availability of sensitive assays to detect measurable/minimal residual disease (MRD) in MM and emerging data demonstrating significant prognostic value for attaining MRD negativity, offers an unprecedented opportunity to develop individualized treatment approaches. An important question is to identify who benefits from adding a fourth drug to the MoAb-IMiD triplet, thus individualizing therapy based on depth of response. We hypothesize that prolonged intensive therapy with the addition of Btz for consolidation and maintenance after DRd induction therapy for NDMM will improve survival outcomes with a more pronounced effect when used in MRD positive patients. Methods: Patients with NDMM, R-ISS Stage I or II, who are not eligible to undergo SCT or those willing to defer SCT to first relapse and have not received more than 1 cycle of any NDMM therapy will be enrolled, provided they have measurable disease, adequate organ and marrow function, have received no more than once cycle of therapy for MM and significant peripheral neuropathy or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Importantly, a dominant clone should be identified by lymphotrack assay for future MRD monitoring. Once enrolled, induction therapy will be in 28 day cycles consisting of daraSC (1800 mg) weekly for 2 cycles, every other week for cycles 3-6 and then every 4 weeks for 9 cycles, along with len 25 mg days 1-21 of each cycle and dex 40 mg (20 mg for those > 75 years) weekly. At end of 9 cycles (induction), patients will undergo MRD testing by next generation sequencing and will be classified into MRD positive or negative subgroups. Using MRD as an integral biomarker, the trial employs a randomized biomarker-stratified design as proposed by Freidlin et al. to determine efficacy for each MRD subgroup. Patients will be stratified by MRD status and R-ISS stage and randomized to receive 9 cycles of consolidation with DRd, without (control arm) or with (experimental arm) Btz (1.3 mg/m2 weekly for 3 of 4 weeks), followed by DR maintenance until progression The primary endpoint is consolidation OS. Sample size considerations rest on estimates of MRD subgroup prevalence at the end of induction and operating characteristics establishing the treatment effect within the MRD positive subgroup as primary and MRD negative subgroup as key secondary. The total accrual goal is 1450 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04566328.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20003-e20003
Author(s):  
Sylvia Ai ◽  
Sharlyn Kang ◽  
Peter Presgrave ◽  
Kim Cartwright ◽  
Pauline Warburton ◽  
...  

e20003 Background: A number of studies have demonstrated poorer outcomes for patients with cancer who live in rural/regional areas compared to metropolitan areas. There is conflicting information on the effect of rurality on outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma, and limited information regarding the cause of this discrepancy. Methods: Retrospective analysis of demographic, treatment and outcomes of 238 patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma between 2002-2019 in the Illawara Shoalhaven Local Health District. Results: Patients being treated in a regional cancer care centre had lower overall survival compared to those treated at a metropolitan cancer care centre (median OS = 63.6 months vs. 43.8 months, p=0.004), and a trend towards lower progression-free survival (median PFS = 24.7 months vs. 19.8 months, p=0.228) despite treatment by the same group of hematologists. There was a lower rate of autologous transplantation for patients treated at a regional cancer care centre compared to a metropolitan cancer care centre (36% vs. 18%, p=0.007). Conclusions: Survival differences between patients with multiple myeloma living in regional areas compared to metropolitan areas may be due to lower rates of autologous transplantation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document