Asymptotic of weak solutions for linear elliptic nonlocal Robin problem without Dini-continuity condition in a plane angle domain

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Żyjewski
2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-217
Author(s):  
Damian Wiśniewski

AbstractWe investigate the behaviour of weak solutions of boundary value problems (Dirichlet, Neumann, Robin and mixed) for linear elliptic divergence second order equations in domains extending to infinity along a cone. We find an exponent of the solution decreasing rate: we derive the estimate of the weak solution modulus for our problems near the infinity under assumption that leading coefficients of the equations do not satisfy the Dini-continuity condition.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Borsuk ◽  
Krzysztof Żyjewski

AbstractWe investigate the behavior of weak solutions to the nonlocal Robin problem for quasilinear elliptic divergence second order equations in a neighborhood of the boundary corner point. We find an exponent of the solution decreasing rate near the boundary corner point.


Author(s):  
Domenico Angelo La Manna ◽  
Chiara Leone ◽  
Roberta Schiattarella

Abstract In this paper we consider a linear elliptic equation in divergence form $$\begin{aligned} \sum _{i,j}D_j(a_{ij}(x)D_i u )=0 \quad \hbox {in } \Omega . \end{aligned}$$ ∑ i , j D j ( a ij ( x ) D i u ) = 0 in Ω . Assuming the coefficients $$a_{ij}$$ a ij in $$W^{1,n}(\Omega )$$ W 1 , n ( Ω ) with a modulus of continuity satisfying a certain Dini-type continuity condition, we prove that any very weak solution $$u\in L^{n'}_\mathrm{loc}(\Omega )$$ u ∈ L loc n ′ ( Ω ) of (0.1) is actually a weak solution in $$W^{1,2}_\mathrm{loc}(\Omega )$$ W loc 1 , 2 ( Ω ) .


2020 ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
M. I. Kalinin ◽  
L. K. Isaev ◽  
F. V. Bulygin

The situation that has developed in the International System of Units (SI) as a result of adopting the recommendation of the International Committee of Weights and Measures (CIPM) in 1980, which proposed to consider plane and solid angles as dimensionless derived quantities, is analyzed. It is shown that the basis for such a solution was a misunderstanding of the mathematical formula relating the arc length of a circle with its radius and corresponding central angle, as well as of the expansions of trigonometric functions in series. From the analysis presented in the article, it follows that a plane angle does not depend on any of the SI quantities and should be assigned to the base quantities, and its unit, the radian, should be added to the base SI units. A solid angle, in this case, turns out to be a derived quantity of a plane angle. Its unit, the steradian, is a coherent derived unit equal to the square radian.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document