scholarly journals Clinical Utility of Cardiac Troponin I and Cardiac Troponin T Measurements

1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 83-87
Author(s):  
Michaela Adamcová ◽  
Zdeněk Kokštein ◽  
Jaroslava Vávrová

The measurement of CK-MB remains the test of choice for confirmation or exclusion of AMI and probably will remain the test of choice for routine diagnosis in the near future. Nowadays determination of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) as a method relatively expensive and time-consuming should be restricted to clinical settings that really require their high specificity.

Author(s):  
RA Jones ◽  
J Barratt ◽  
EA Brettell ◽  
P Cockwell ◽  
RN Dalton ◽  
...  

Background Patients with chronic kidney disease often have increased plasma cardiac troponin concentration in the absence of myocardial infarction. Incidence of myocardial infarction is high in this population, and diagnosis, particularly of non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), is challenging. Knowledge of biological variation aids understanding of serial cardiac troponin measurements and could improve interpretation in clinical practice. The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) recommended the use of a 20% reference change value in patients with kidney failure. The aim of this study was to calculate the biological variation of cardiac troponin I and cardiac troponin T in patients with moderate chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2). Methods and results Plasma samples were obtained from 20 patients (median GFR 43.0 mL/min/1.73 m2) once a week for four consecutive weeks. Cardiac troponin I (Abbott ARCHITECT® i2000SR, median 4.3 ng/L, upper 99th percentile of reference population 26.2 ng/L) and cardiac troponin T (Roche Cobas® e601, median 11.8 ng/L, upper 99th percentile of reference population 14 ng/L) were measured in duplicate using high-sensitivity assays. After outlier removal and log transformation, 18 patients’ data were subject to ANOVA, and within-subject (CVI), between-subject (CVG) and analytical (CVA) variation calculated. Variation for cardiac troponin I was 15.0%, 105.6%, 8.3%, respectively, and for cardiac troponin T 7.4%, 78.4%, 3.1%, respectively. Reference change values for increasing and decreasing troponin concentrations were +60%/–38% for cardiac troponin I and +25%/–20% for cardiac troponin T. Conclusions The observed reference change value for cardiac troponin T is broadly compatible with the NACB recommendation, but for cardiac troponin I, larger changes are required to define significant change. The incorporation of separate RCVs for cardiac troponin I and cardiac troponin T, and separate RCVs for rising and falling concentrations of cardiac troponin, should be considered when developing guidance for interpretation of sequential cardiac troponin measurements.


2020 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Sjur H. Tveit ◽  
Peder L. Myhre ◽  
Helge Røsjø ◽  
Torbjørn Omland

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 421-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seoung Mann Sou ◽  
Christian Puelacher ◽  
Raphael Twerenbold ◽  
Max Wagener ◽  
Ursina Honegger ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 423-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salim Fredericks ◽  
Hans Degens ◽  
Godfrina McKoy ◽  
Katie Bainbridge ◽  
Paul O. Collinson ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 1338-1344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Stiegler ◽  
Yuriko Fischer ◽  
Jaime F Vazquez-Jimenez ◽  
Jürgen Graf ◽  
Karsten Filzmaier ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The use of plasma rather than serum for determination of cardiac troponins can improve turnaround time and potentially avoid incomplete serum separation that may produce falsely increased results. We investigated the influence of incomplete serum separation and the effect of heparin-plasma on cardiac troponin concentrations. Methods: Serum and heparin-plasma samples were drawn simultaneously from 100 patients (50 patients with acute coronary syndrome and 50 patients after open heart surgery) and measured on three different analytical systems, two for determination of cardiac troponin I (cTnI; Abbott AxSYM and Bayer ACS:Centaur) and one for cardiac troponin T (cTnT; Roche Elecsys cTnT STAT). Serum samples were reanalyzed after a second centrifugation to assess the influence of incomplete serum separation. Results: Mean results (± 95% confidence interval) in heparin-plasma compared with serum were 101% ± 2% (AxSYM cTnI), 94% ± 3% (ACS:Centaur cTnI), and 99% ± 3% (Elecsys cTnT). Differences >20% were seen in 11% of results on the ACS:Centaur, 9% of results on Elecsys cTnT, and 2% of results on the AxSYM. For the Elecsys cTnT assay, the magnitude of the difference between serum and plasma was independent of the absolute concentration and confined to individual samples, and was reversed by treatment with heparinase. A second centrifugation had no effect on serum results by any of the assays. Conclusion: The concentrations of troponins measured in heparin-plasma are markedly lower than in serum in some cases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document