A survey on the responsive and proactive market orientation (2005-2015)

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
N.A. Ngatno
2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Wei Lin ◽  
Li Keng Cheng ◽  
Lei-Yu Wu

PurposeBecause of relatively short product life cycles, radical product innovation has more significant influences on firms' competitive advantages in dynamic environments. Past studies identified various cultural characteristics of a firm, which are key drivers of developing radical product innovation on an ongoing basis. However, few studies have investigated the interaction between organizational culture and external market feedback in developing radical product innovation.Design/methodology/approachTo address the identified research gaps, this empirical research began by presenting conceptual foundations that lead to the hypothesized model and then analyzed survey data from 201 original equipment manufacturer suppliers in search of evidence supporting the hypotheses.FindingsThe results suggested that a supplier's entrepreneurial orientation and long-term orientation significantly and positively affected proactive market orientation, with proactive market orientation significantly and positively correlated with radical product innovation. The study confirmed that a proactive market orientation is essential in order for entrepreneurial orientation and long-term orientation to affect radical product innovation. Additionally, this study found that supplier–customer electronic integration has a moderating effect on proactive market orientation and radical product innovation.Originality/valueRadical product innovation is a topic of great interest for both academia and industry, yet a comprehensive conceptual framework for its antecedents is still lacking. To fill this theoretical gap, the present study extended the studies on radical product innovation and examined the relationship between different strategic orientation types in terms of supplier–customer strategic behaviors to determine how suppliers enhance radical product innovation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 841-859
Author(s):  
Fabian F. Osorio Tinoco ◽  
Miguel Hernández-Espallardo ◽  
Augusto Rodriguez-Orejuela

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to clarify how responsive market orientation (RMO) and proactive market orientation (PMO) create competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach Nonlinear and interaction effects are tested by applying hierarchical regression analysis to a sample of 272 Colombian manufacturing companies. Findings The results show that although market orientation promotes the competitive advantage of a business, both approaches – responsive and proactive – exhibit saturation effects and a positive interaction. Research limitations/implications The main limitation of this study is the cross-sectional design and the use of a single source for data collection. It is suggested that future research includes different orientations combined with these two market orientations – responsive and proactive – for achieving competitive advantage. In addition, further studies could replicate this analysis for different environmental conditions. Originality/value This paper simultaneously evaluates the nonlinear and complementary effects of RMO and PMO. From a strategic standpoint, it presents an empirical confirmation of the familiarity trap, the failure trap and the positive effects of combining RMO and PMO.


2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 666-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mateja Bodlaj ◽  
Germa Coenders ◽  
Vesna Zabkar

The study investigates how market and technological changes in an organization's business environment moderate the relationships between responsive and proactive market orientation, innovation success, and market success of the organization. The respondents in the study were senior managers of companies operating in a Central European country. The Internet survey resulted in 441 usable questionnaires. Data were analyzed using a non-linear structural equation models with MPLUS5. The results provide support for distinguishing between the two complementary forms of market orientation, proactive and responsive. While proactive market orientation is a determinant of both innovation and market success of the organization, the impact of responsive market orientation on the innovation and market success is positive and significant only in a rapidly changing market environment. Companies can improve their innovation success and in turn market success by improving their proactive market orientation, i.e. by investing resources in exploring customer needs, customer problems with existing products and latent customer needs. The study contributes to the literature by examining the entire chain of relationships between market orientation, innovation success and market success by adopting both a responsive and proactive market orientation. It is the first study that examines these relationships in the context of companies from a European country and with consideration of market turbulence/changes.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shashishekar M.S. ◽  
Sandip Anand ◽  
Arun Kumar Paul

Purpose Smart connected products (SCP) are the new archetype of products evolving. SCP are subtly changing the product-centric business to system-centric. Development and monetization of new SCP is an uphill task, it necessitates unique market orientation and business models. The purpose of this study is to establish a framework of variables influencing new smart connected products performance (NSCPP) at the market place, suggest methods to operationalize the framework. Design/methodology/approach The study identified key variables influencing NSCPP from existing literature. Conceptualized unique theoretical frameworks of these variables and empirically validated structural relationships. The study performed structural equation modeling using the data collected from 163 respondents having managed the development and monetization of 138 new SCP launches. Findings The study established structural relationships among selected variables proactive market orientation (ProMO), new product development proficiency (NPDPro) and business model innovation (BMoI). It revealed that the effect of ProMO is manifested through NPDPro. BMoI and NPDPro significantly influence NSCPP. Practical implications The study presented “ProMO Canvas” to plan and operationalize ProMO integrated with new product development (NPD) stage-gate activities. The study suggested the practitioners to execute ProMO activities preceding NPD activities and execute NPD, business model development activities in parallel to attain superior NSCPP. Originality/value This study is a novel effort to derive a unique empirical framework of variables ProMO, NPDPro and BMoI to attain superior NSCPP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document