Does analysts following impede information asymmetry Evidence from analyst coverage firms

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ramesh Chandra Das
2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 220-233
Author(s):  
Samie Ahmed Sayed ◽  
Latha Sreeram

Executive Summary Over the last decade, efforts have been made to improve the quality of financial reporting and corporate governance standards prevailing in emerging markets. Even after 20 years of globalization, emerging markets continue to trade as a separate class ( Bekaert & Harvey, 2014 ). On account of a weak regulatory environment, firm-specific information asymmetry is expected to be on the higher side as compared to developed markets. In such an environment, any factors which mitigate information asymmetry may help improve efficiency of information providers such as equity research analysts. The role of equity research analysts is to process financial information and provide estimates which may be used by investors to make informed investment decisions. This study investigates whether the factors which mitigate firm-specific information asymmetry improve analyst target price accuracy in India. We expect sophisticated financial intermediaries such as equity research analysts to produce more accurate target price forecasts for firms with higher frequency of corporate announcements, higher analyst coverage, and higher foreign institutional holdings. Past research suggests that these three factors reduce information asymmetry and this reduction could possibly help analysts produce superior results. Our results show that higher frequency of corporate announcements creates short-term noise which reduces target price accuracy at the end of one-year forecast horizon. Our findings reveal that higher analyst coverage leads to better flow of firm-specific private information and improves target price accuracy anytime during or at the end of one year. We report that higher foreign institutional holding possibly improves stock liquidity, attracting more traders, which eventually leads to better target price accuracy at the end of forecast horizon. Our key finding is that there is a reduction in firm-specific information asymmetry due to the presence of more number of analysts and higher percentage of institutional holding.


Author(s):  
Ronald W. Best ◽  
Charles W. Hodges ◽  
Bing-Xuan Lin

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">We use financial analyst coverage as a measure of information asymmetry to examine excess firm values associated with single- and multi-segment firms.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>We explicitly examine whether differences in analyst coverage can explain the diversification discount.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>We find that information asymmetry plays a major role in the valuation of companies and explains a large portion of the diversification discount.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>However, a significant diversification discount remains after controlling for the effects of analyst coverage.</span></span></p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Prokofieva

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the effect of dissemination of corporate disclosure via Twitter. In particular, the study is focused on listed companies in Australia that employed Twitter as a secondary dissemination channel for corporate announcements in 2008–2013. Based on a sample of 3,516 announcements at the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) related to 109 listed companies, the research employs the Investor Recognition Hypothesis to investigate the effect of Twitter activity on the information asymmetry proxied by abnormal spread (SpreadAbn). The findings show that there is a negative association between SpreadAbn and tweets posted by a firm during the announcement period. Further analysis shows that this association is stronger for firms less visible through business press or financial analyst coverage. The study concludes that while corporate announcements are publicly available through the ASX platform, dissemination of corporate announcements through Twitter allows companies to attract investors' attention and decrease information asymmetry.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 671-685
Author(s):  
Madhurima Bhattacharyay ◽  
Feng Jiao

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify and examine two contrasting mechanisms of information asymmetry for cross-listed firms with respect to the information environment and its impact on earnings response. Design/methodology/approach The study empirically assesses two mechanisms of information asymmetry (“seeing” and/or “believing”) by looking at abnormal returns and volume reactions to international firms’ earnings announcements pre- and post-listing in the USA from 1990 to 2012. Findings The authors’ findings indicate that investors “seeing” more (media and analyst coverage) decrease the earnings response; however, “believing” more or gaining more credibility has the opposite effects. Based on the results, both mechanisms of information asymmetry can take effect simultaneously. Research limitations/implications The study sheds light on the multi-dimensional impact of the improved information environment that non-US firms face when they list their securities on US exchanges. Originality/value This study identifies and reconciles these two mechanisms of information asymmetry (visibility and credibility) under one setting and estimates the magnitude of each effect empirically.


2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 657-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yee-Boon Foo

This study draws on Merton’s investor recognition hypothesis to investigate whether (1) the sponsored analyst coverage scheme introduced by the Bursa Malaysia in April 2005 is associated with stock turnover, and (2) the relationship is stronger for firms with high information asymmetry. The results show that stock turnover is positively associated with the frequency of coverage and the association is stronger for firms with higher information asymmetry. In addition, it is found that during the initial stage of the scheme where the stock market was experiencing a downturn, analyst coverage has a significant constraining effect on the reduction in stock turnover.


2017 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Amiram ◽  
Alon Kalay ◽  
Avner Kalay ◽  
N. Bugra Ozel

ABSTRACT We examine the role of the coupon choice in bond contracts as a signaling mechanism in the presence of information asymmetry between borrowers and lenders about the credit quality of the borrower. Prior literature focuses on the use of maturity as a signaling mechanism. We conjecture that the coupon is a more effective signaling mechanism. We exploit the enactment of Regulation Fair Disclosure (RegFD) as an exogenous shock to the level of information asymmetry, and employ both bond- and equity market-based variables of information asymmetry to test our conjecture. We find that following the enactment of RegFD, the coupon rates of bonds issued by unrated firms increase relatively more than those of rated firms, consistent with the coupon choice addressing information asymmetry. We fail to find similar increases in maturity. Our inferences remain the same when using the probability of informed trade to measure relative changes in information asymmetry around the enactment of RegFD. We also draw similar conclusions utilizing exogenous drops in analyst coverage that result from brokerage house closures as an alternative quasi-natural experiment. Finally, we provide evidence that the coupon is used more extensively when issuance costs are higher, precisely when maturity is predicted to be a less efficient contract term with which to address information asymmetry. JEL Classifications: G10; G23; M21; M41.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bipin Sony ◽  
Saumitra Bhaduri

We examine the role of information asymmetry in the debt–equity choice decisions of firms from an important emerging market, India. Information problems are more severe in the emerging markets and we find strong evidence in favour of information asymmetry playing a key role in the capital structure decisions of Indian firms. Consistent with the pecking order model, we find that equity issues are lesser in number and firms facing fewer information problems issue equity. We use novel variables such as analyst coverage, analyst forecast surprise and dispersion to capture information asymmetry in the Indian market. JEL: G32


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document