Evaluating information criteria in latent class analysis: application to identify classes of breast cancer dataset

Author(s):  
Abdallah Abarda ◽  
Mohamed Dakkon ◽  
Khawla Asmi ◽  
Youssef Bentaleb
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Shang Cao ◽  
Shurong Lu ◽  
Jinyi Zhou ◽  
Zheng Zhu ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine if specific dietary patterns are associated with breast cancer risk in Chinese women. Design: Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed to identify generic dietary patterns based on daily food-frequency data. Setting: The Chinese Wuxi Exposure and Breast Cancer Study (2013-2014). Participants: A population-based case-control study (695 cases, 804 controls). Results: Four dietary patterns were identified, Prudent, Chinese traditional, Western, and Picky, the proportion in the controls and cases were 0.30/0.32/0.16/0.23 and 0.29/0.26/0.11/0.33, respectively. Women in Picky class were characterized by higher extreme probabilities of non-consumption on specific foods, the highest probabilities of consumption of pickled foods, and the lowest probabilities of consumption of cereals, soy foods, and nuts. Compared with Prudent class, Picky class was associated with a higher risk (OR=1.42, 95%CI=1.06, 1.90), while the relevant association was only in post- (OR=1.44, 95%CI=1.01, 2.05) but not premenopausal women. The Western class characterized by high-protein, -fat, and -sugar foods, the Chinese traditional class characterized by typical consumption of soy foods and white meat over red meat, both of them showed no difference in BC risk compared with Prudent class did. Conclusions: LCA capture the heterogeneity of individuals embedded in the population, could be a useful approach in the study of dietary pattern and disease. Our results indicated that the Picky class might have a positive association with the risk of breast cancer.


2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 2638-2646
Author(s):  
Jinyu Zhang ◽  
Jichuan Wang ◽  
Jie Zhou ◽  
Qiong Fang ◽  
Nan Zhang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Garrett Strizich ◽  
Marilie D. Gammon ◽  
Judith S. Jacobson ◽  
Melanie Wall ◽  
Page Abrahamson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shang Cao ◽  
Linchen Liu ◽  
Qianrang Zhu ◽  
Zheng Zhu ◽  
Jinyi Zhou ◽  
...  

Background: Diet research focuses on the characteristics of “dietary patterns” regardless of the statistical methods used to derive them. However, the solutions to these methods are both conceptually and statistically different.Methods: We compared factor analysis (FA) and latent class analysis (LCA) methods to identify the dietary patterns of participants in the Chinese Wuxi Exposure and Breast Cancer Study, a population-based case-control study that included 818 patients and 935 healthy controls. We examined the association between dietary patterns and plasma lipid markers and the breast cancer risk.Results: Factor analysis grouped correlated food items into five factors, while LCA classified the subjects into four mutually exclusive classes. For FA, we found that the Prudent-factor was associated with a lower risk of breast cancer [4th vs. 1st quartile: odds ratio (OR) for 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52, 0.95], whereas the Picky-factor was associated with a higher risk (4th vs. 1st quartile: OR for 1.35, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.81). For LCA, using the Prudent-class as the reference, the Picky-class has a positive association with the risk of breast cancer (OR for 1.42, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.90). The multivariate-adjusted model containing all of the factors was better than that containing all of the classes in predicting HDL cholesterol (p = 0.04), triacylglycerols (p = 0.03), blood glucose (p = 0.04), apolipoprotein A1 (p = 0.02), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (p = 0.02), but was weaker than that in predicting the breast cancer risk (p = 0.03).Conclusion: Factor analysis is useful for understanding which foods are consumed in combination and for studying the associations with biomarkers, while LCA is useful for classifying individuals into mutually exclusive subgroups and compares the disease risk between the groups.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 5147-5156
Author(s):  
Xiaoling Yuan ◽  
Jichuan Wang ◽  
Catherine M. Bender ◽  
Nan Zhang ◽  
Changrong Yuan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document