A review of intellectual property management practices using qualitative comparative analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocio De La Torre ◽  
Cristina Alcaide Muñoz ◽  
Andrea Ollo López
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Qualitative Comparative Analysis ◽  
Property Management ◽  
Intellectual Property Management

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN INTER-ORGANISATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS — FINDINGS FROM AN INTERVIEW STUDY

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (03) ◽  
pp. 399-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
TUIJA LUOMA ◽  
JAAKKO PAASI ◽  
KATRI VALKOKARI
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Interview Study ◽  
Property Management ◽  
Innovation Development ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Intellectual Property Management ◽  
Knowledge Protection ◽  
Public Organisations

The paper describes findings from an interview study about intellectual property management practices in inter-organisational relationships. A total of 40 companies and public organisations in Finland and in the Netherlands were studied using semi-structured face-to-face interviews. The organisations represented different sizes and fields of industry. About 90% of the interviewed companies collaborated in their innovation efforts. However, the companies generally mentioned that the management of intellectual property and knowledge is very challenging when other actors are involved in parts of the innovation development process. Confidentiality agreements are typically used to ensure knowledge protection in these relationships. Patenting is important for about half of the companies, but joint patenting is not a common practice. Companies in Finland and in the Netherlands are seen to behave very similarly with regards to the collaboration activities and intellectual property (IP) management in these relationships.

scholarly journals Intellectual Property Management: European Universities Experience

2020 ◽  
pp. 5-11
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Kalinin ◽  
Yu. V. Nechepurenko
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Property Management ◽  
European Universities ◽  
Intellectual Property Management ◽  
Main Components ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The University

A comparative analysis of policies in the field of intellectual property (IP) of universities in leading European countries: Switzerland, the UK and the Netherlands. As a result of the comparison, the main components of these policies are identified as a single document: the purpose of the policy, the procedure for determining copyright holders, students' rights to IP, material incentives for using IP, and responsible structures. The policy of each university takes into account the features and traditions of its activities. It was revealed that each university has its own approach to material incentives for the creation and use of IP. The conditions are established under which the university does not claim to IP created by students. It is concluded that it is advisable to develop similar IP policies for Belarusian universities.

scholarly journals Research on the Relationship between Shared Leadership and Individual Creativity-Qualitative Comparative Analysis on the Basis of Clear Set

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 5445
Author(s):  
Muyun Sun ◽  
Jigan Wang ◽  
Ting Wen
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Environmental Factors ◽  
Shared Leadership ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Qualitative Comparative Analysis ◽  
Necessary Condition ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Sufficient And Necessary Condition

Creativity is the key to obtaining and maintaining competitiveness of modern organizations, and it has attracted much attention from academic circles and management practices. Shared leadership is believed to effectively influence team output. However, research on the impact of individual creativity is still in its infancy. This study adopts the qualitative comparative analysis method, taking 1584 individuals as the research objects, underpinned by a questionnaire-based survey. It investigates the influence of the team’s shared leadership network elements and organizational environmental factors on the individual creativity. We have found that there are six combination of conditions of shared leadership and organizational environmental factors constituting sufficient combination of conditions to increase or decrease individual creativity. Moreover, we have noticed that the low network density of shared leadership is a sufficient and necessary condition of reducing individual creativity. Our results also provide management suggestions for practical activities during the team management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document