scholarly journals Intellectual Property Management: European Universities Experience

2020 ◽  
pp. 5-11
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Kalinin ◽  
Yu. V. Nechepurenko
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Property Management ◽  
European Universities ◽  
Intellectual Property Management ◽  
Main Components ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The University

A comparative analysis of policies in the field of intellectual property (IP) of universities in leading European countries: Switzerland, the UK and the Netherlands. As a result of the comparison, the main components of these policies are identified as a single document: the purpose of the policy, the procedure for determining copyright holders, students' rights to IP, material incentives for using IP, and responsible structures. The policy of each university takes into account the features and traditions of its activities. It was revealed that each university has its own approach to material incentives for the creation and use of IP. The conditions are established under which the university does not claim to IP created by students. It is concluded that it is advisable to develop similar IP policies for Belarusian universities.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN INTER-ORGANISATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS — FINDINGS FROM AN INTERVIEW STUDY

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (03) ◽  
pp. 399-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
TUIJA LUOMA ◽  
JAAKKO PAASI ◽  
KATRI VALKOKARI
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Interview Study ◽  
Property Management ◽  
Innovation Development ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Intellectual Property Management ◽  
Knowledge Protection ◽  
Public Organisations

The paper describes findings from an interview study about intellectual property management practices in inter-organisational relationships. A total of 40 companies and public organisations in Finland and in the Netherlands were studied using semi-structured face-to-face interviews. The organisations represented different sizes and fields of industry. About 90% of the interviewed companies collaborated in their innovation efforts. However, the companies generally mentioned that the management of intellectual property and knowledge is very challenging when other actors are involved in parts of the innovation development process. Confidentiality agreements are typically used to ensure knowledge protection in these relationships. Patenting is important for about half of the companies, but joint patenting is not a common practice. Companies in Finland and in the Netherlands are seen to behave very similarly with regards to the collaboration activities and intellectual property (IP) management in these relationships.

Teachers’ and pupils’ perspectives on homosexuality: A comparative analysis across European countries

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-519
Author(s):  
Kristof De Witte ◽  
Kaat Iterbeke ◽  
Oliver Holz
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
Unique Data ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Teachers Perspectives ◽  
General Climate ◽  
Over Time

This article offers the first large-scale comparative analysis of pupils’ and teachers’ perspectives on homosexuality using two waves (2013 and 2017) of self-collected data through questionnaires issued in eight European countries: Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, the UK, Spain, Poland, Hungary and Turkey. Using these unique data, the authors examine to what extent differences prevail across countries, what mechanisms explain the differences, and how the differences change over time. The results indicate significant differences across countries. Moreover, although a positive trend can be observed between the two waves of the survey, in some countries the general climate towards homosexuality is reversing.

scholarly journals Innovation as a Component of Fundamental Research. An Architect's View

2018 ◽  
pp. 73-83
Author(s):  
Inna V. Dianova-Klokova ◽  
Dmitriy D. Metaniev
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Architectural Design ◽  
Science Parks ◽  
Research Results ◽  
European Universities ◽  
Fundamental Research ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The University ◽  
University Science

The article discusses the connection between fundamental science and innovation on the examples of leading European universities and their science parks. It is noted that the role of innovative component of the University science is steadily increasing. Also increases interest of scientists in commercialization of research results; the influence of this factor on the location of science parks is growing. Based on the study of innovative objects the authors present the main features of the architectural design and spatial techniques, contributing to the reduction of time of commercialization of research results and increasing their effectiveness. The descriptions and illustrations of some of the universities in the UK, Germany, the Netherlands and Finland are given

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document