Surface residual stress measurements by layer removal method

Author(s):  
Yury I. Zamashchikov
Procedia CIRP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. 42-45
Author(s):  
Maria Aurrekoetxea ◽  
Ravi Bilkhu ◽  
Iñigo Llanos ◽  
Sabino Ayvar-Soberanis ◽  
Luis Norberto Lopez de Lacalle

Author(s):  
E.F. Rybicki ◽  
J.R. Shadley ◽  
R.T.R. McGrann ◽  
A.C. Savarimuthu ◽  
D. Graving

Abstract Thermal spray coatings are subjected to mechanical loadings in many applications, and there is a need to evaluate the mechanical properties of these coatings. Mechanical properties of interest in the performance of thermal spray coatings include fatigue life, wear resistance, bond strength. Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, and residual stresses. One property that has a large effect on the performance of thermal spray coated parts is the residual stress distribution in the thermal spray coating and in the substrate. Thus, it is important to have (1) a fundamentally sound method for evaluating residual stresses and (2) a written recommended procedure for applying the method. ASM International is not a standard writing organization. Yet, the increased use of thermal spray coatings and the need for documentation on methods for evaluating mechanical properties of thermal spray coatings have generated a need to prepare Recommended Practices. To meet this need, the ASM International Thermal Spray Society has formed three subcommittees to prepare Recommended Practices for thermal spray coatings. This paper describes a draft form of a Recommended Practice for evaluating residual stresses in thermal spray coatings. This Recommended Practice is being developed by the Subcommittee on "Evaluating of Mechanical Properties of Thermal Spray Coatings". The method, called the Modified Layer Removal Method, has been presented in several papers and has been used for a variety of different coatings. The paper describes the dimensions of the test specimen, the equipment needed, the procedure for removing layers, and the methods for collecting and interpreting the data to evaluate through thickness residual stresses. The Recommended Practice (RP) is in Draft form, but is presented to let the thermal spray community know about the RP effort and invite comments and volunteers to write other RP's.


1989 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.C. Chen ◽  
Yoshiki Oshida

AbstractMulti-layer thin film which has structure of Cu/Cr/K/Cr/Cu prepared by sputtering process was analyzed for interfacial stresses for as-deposited conditions. This structure was also annealed at 150°C, 250°C, and 350°C for around 15 min. in a vacuum and cooled slowly down for stress analyses.Equations derived by Osgood [1] for residual stress estimations for homogeneous material system using layer removal technique (stress relief) is now applied for inhomogeneous system (multilayer structure). The results are compared with the data obtained from x-ray diffraction technique by using sin2Ψ-2θ method, for Cu layer.From the present analyses, the data obatined using layer removal seem to be qualitatively consistent with but not quantitatively in agreement with x-ray method. Data obtained using the layer removal method have some overlaps with those obtained from x-ray technique. However, in details, data from the curvature method present different scattering band from the x-ray method. It is suggested that the layer removal method is more practical to be used to estimate the average residual stress of the multi-layer system not only because the layer removal method estimates the bulk behavior but also when the metal film is thin (e.g., 200A for Cr layer), x-ray technique becomes impractical. By annealing the sputtered structure up to 250°C, the residual stresses, in particularly Cu layer, decreased on both sides in x- and y-directions.From the main results drawn from the present studies, the layer removal sequence for the curvature method shows significant affects on the obtained results of residual stresses. Minimizing influences caused by layer removal sequences as well as removing duration and temperature provides the most accurate results on residual stress measurements.


2011 ◽  
Vol 519 (10) ◽  
pp. 3249-3253 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.M. Jiang ◽  
J. Peng ◽  
Y.G. Liao ◽  
Y.C. Zhou ◽  
J. Liang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document