scholarly journals Digital Financial Markets and (Europe’s) Private Law – A Case for Regulatory Competition?

2021 ◽  
pp. 213-252
Author(s):  
Rainer Kulms
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3A) ◽  
pp. 60-66
Author(s):  
Natalya I. Besedkina ◽  
Vasily V. Gushchin ◽  
Taimuraz E. Kallagov ◽  
Tatiana V. Larina ◽  
Zlata V. Makarchuk

The purpose of the article is to study the legal nature and essence of the categories of reasonableness and good faith in the field of private law regulation in the legislation of modern Russia. The methodological basis of the research was the general scientific dialectical method of cognition and the private scientific methods that follow from it: system-structural, concrete-sociological, technical-legal, historical-legal, and comparative legal methods. Their application allowed the authors of the article to study the objects under consideration in their interrelation, integrity, comprehensively and objectively. The article concludes that good faith is essential in filling the gaps in the legislation. It is not always possible to establish a single rule, to approve a norm that excludes unfair conduct. The gaps are not only due to legislative errors. Two factors have an important impact: the diversity of relations and their constant development in different areas (for example, e-commerce, financial markets).


2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Doralt ◽  
Alexander Hellgardt ◽  
Klaus J. Hopt ◽  
Patrick C. Leyens ◽  
Markus Roth ◽  
...  

In 2007 the European Commission produced a Staff Working Paper seeking consultation on the development of auditors' liability in Europe. The present article represents the views of the Working Group on the subject set up by the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law in Hamburg.


2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-336
Author(s):  
Mario Serio

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to try and trace a new itinerary in the matter of the destabilization of financial institutions, i.e. the identification of a catalogue of measures that private law can offer in order to make sure that all unlawful initiatives resulting in the loss of credibility of financial markets and prejudice to the public at large do not escape the imposition of all possible liabilities.Design/methodology/approachThe matter here applied consists of the recourse to a number of experiences deriving from European legal systems that have tackled the phenomenon of unlawful attacks on the integrity of the financial markets through individual or organized acts. This comparative approach also benefits from the scrutiny of both legislation and judicial decisions: the latter are also looked at from the perspective of legal authors.FindingsThe most striking result of the research is that the instruments provided for by the private law remedies seem to be very efficient in the contrast of unlawful practices adversely affecting financial markets: the new spirit emerging from this survey is that it is imperative to set aside all contracts and agreements aimed at creating illicit ways to make profits and hide their origins.Practical implicationsThe practical implication should be to encourage all institutions with the task of checking the good functioning of financial markets to avail themselves of the tools here described to stabilize markets and deprive illegal contracts of their ill effects: it would be most desirable if such an approach were to be taken.Originality/valueThe novelty lies in the new approach described above (practical implications).


Author(s):  
Olha O. Cherednychenko

AbstractToday, legislators, courts, financial regulators and other actors at the EU and national level face major new challenges in safeguarding public and private interests in an increasingly digital and sustainability-minded environment surrounding financial markets. Innovative ways of addressing tensions between the common good and the individual preferences of market actors are needed to address these challenges. However, at present, the efforts to develop workable solutions are seriously hampered by the gap between the two areas of law that profoundly shape the financial markets—financial regulation and private law—in the current European policy discourse and legal scholarship. This article is an attempt to systematically rethink the role of private law in the regulatory and enforcement landscape for financial markets and its relationship with public regulation more generally. It argues that financial regulation and private law are not two parallel universes, but rather two sides of the same coin, each of which has a critical role to play in safeguarding public and private interests. Examining EU financial regulation through the ‘private law’ lens would enable us to unveil a complex interplay between the regulatory dimension, contractual settings and private law remedies that we need to better understand in order to be able to better regulate financial markets. Conversely, examining national private law through the European ‘regulatory’ lens would allow us to unpack the potential of traditional private law to contribute to the objectives of EU financial regulation, while at the same time realising justice between private parties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document