1989 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1343-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruhul Amin ◽  
Shifiq A. Chowdhury ◽  
G.M. Kamal ◽  
J. Chowdhury

1969 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 821-826
Author(s):  
UMAR ALEEM ◽  
NOOR KHAN ◽  
ZAKRIA ZAKAR ◽  
ROBEENA ZAKAR ◽  
SHAMAILA

OBJECTIVES: No practical and theoretical pattern for identifying health literacy and its utilizationpatterns exist. Health literacy is referring to the ability to read and perform numerical tasks'. Thisstudy’s objective was to recognize useful clinically questions that might be effective for theidentification of marginal and inadequate health literacy in adults.MATERIAL AND METHODS: In person interviews from a sample of n=332 middle age adults (28-40years) completed. A 5 point likert scale questionnaire include 16 literacy screening questionsadministered, followed by a validated health measure, the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy inAdults (STOHFLA). Grounded on the STOHFLA men were categorized as having inadequate,marginal, and adequate health literacy. Health care utilization pattern were identified in a separatequestionnaire through 10 close ended questions.RESULTS: Inadequate health literacy accounts for 42%, marginal health literacy 14% and adequatehealth literacy for 44% of the participants. 23% of the participants do not go to visit the hospital anddoctor in minor health related issues. 29% of the participants use over the counter drugs, and only 48%of the participants visit health facilities (Community Health Center, BHU, RHCs, THQ, DHQ) for theirhealth related issues.CONCLUSION:Health literacy and health care utilization are not so common in middle age adults inPakistan. The need of health literacy must be addressed in middle age adults, and it is possible when thehealth care facilities are fully utilized.KEYWORDS:Heallh Literacy, Healthcare Utilization, Community Health Center, Basic health Unit,Rural Health Center


Medical Care ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra K. Litzelman ◽  
Thomas S. Inui ◽  
Wilma J. Griffin ◽  
Anthony Perkins ◽  
Ann H. Cottingham ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. e2025065
Author(s):  
Vasil I. Yasenov ◽  
Jens Hainmueller ◽  
Michael Hotard ◽  
Duncan Lawrence ◽  
Laura M. Gottlieb ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 738-743
Author(s):  
Menghan Shen ◽  
Wen He ◽  
Linyan Li ◽  
Yushan Wu

Abstract Background In China, the government has encouraged the participation of private sector facilities in primary care to improve health care quality. Objective We compare health care utilization patterns among patients who select private versus public community health centres (CHCs) for reimbursed outpatient services. Methods This paper uses data from the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance scheme from 2013 to 2016 in one of the largest cities in China. We used a Poisson model and a logistic model to examine outcomes on monthly outpatient visits and the probability of hospitalization, respectively. Results Compared with being a user of a public CHC, being a user of a private CHC is associated with a 26.2% lower incidence rate of outpatient visits to hospitals [95% confidence interval (CI): 30.1–21.8%] and no difference in rates of visits to CHCs or hospitalization. Among patients with diabetes or hypertension, being a user of a private CHC is associated with a 12.9% lower incidence rate of outpatient visits to CHCs (95% CI: 19.8–5.4%), a 25.6% lower incidence rate of outpatient visits to hospitals (95% CI: 21.4–19.5%) and 22.3% higher odds of hospitalization (95% CI: 3.5–44.7%). Conclusion Being a user of a private CHC is associated with a reduction in outpatient visits to hospitals, which aligns with the goal of reducing hospital congestion at the outpatient level. For patients with chronic diseases, being a user of a private CHC is associated with a higher probability of hospitalization. More research is needed to understand the reason for this difference.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document