Analytical and clinical validation of a novel amplicon-based NGS assay for the evaluation of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 1501-1510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beili Wang ◽  
Shengchao Wu ◽  
Fei Huang ◽  
Minna Shen ◽  
Huiqin Jiang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Evaluating the tumor RAS/BRAF status is important for treatment selection and prognosis assessment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Correction of artifacts from library preparation and sequencing is essential for accurately analyzing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutations. Here, we assessed the analytical and clinical performance of a novel amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay, Firefly™, which employs a concatemer-based error correction strategy. Methods Firefly assay targeting KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA was evaluated using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) reference standards and cfDNA samples from 184 mCRC patients. Plasma results were compared to the mutation status determined by ARMS-based PCR from matched tissue. Samples with a mutation abundance below the limit of detection (LOD) were retested again by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) or NGS. Results The Firefly assay demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity with a 98.89% detection rate at an allele frequency (AF) of 0.2% for 20 ng cfDNA. Generally, 40.76% and 48.37% of the patients were reported to be positive by NGS of plasma cfDNA and ARMS of FFPE tissue, respectively. The concordance rate between the two platforms was 80.11%. In the pre-treatment cohort, the concordance rate between plasma and tissue was 93.33%, based on the 17 common exons that Firefly™ and ARMS genotyped, and the positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) for KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA were 100% and 99.60%, respectively. Conclusions Total plasma cfDNA detected by Firefly offers a viable complement for mutation profiling in CRC patients, given the high agreement with matched tumor samples. Together, these data demonstrate that Firefly could be routinely applied for clinical applications in mCRC patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15084-e15084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beili Wang ◽  
Shengchao Wu ◽  
Fei Huang ◽  
Minna Shen ◽  
Huiqin Jiang ◽  
...  

e15084 Background: Evaluating the tumor RAS/BRAF status is important for treatment selection and prognosis assessment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Correction of artifacts from library preparation and sequencing is essential for accurately analyzing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutations. Here, we assessed the analytical and clinical performance of a novel amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay, Firefly, which employs a concatemer-based error correction strategy. Methods: Firefly assay targeting KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA was evaluated using cfDNA reference standards and cfDNA samples from 184 mCRC patients. Plasma results were compared to the mutation status determined by ARMS-based PCR from matched tissue. For samples with mutation abundance below the limit of detection (LOD), were retested again by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) or NGS. Results: Firefly assay demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity with 98.89% detection rate at allele frequency of 0.2% for 20ng cfDNA. Generally, 40.76% and 48.37% of the patients were reported to be positive by NGS of plasma cfDNA and ARMS of FFPE tissue, respectively. The concordance rate between the two platforms was 80.11%. In pre-treatment cohort, the concordance rate between plasma and tissue was 93.33%, based on the 17 common exons that Firefly and ARMS genotyped, positive percent agreement (PPA), and negative percent agreement (NPA) for KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA was 100% and 99.60%, respectively. Conclusions: Total plasma cfDNA detected by Firefly offers a viable complement for mutation profiling in CRC patients, given highly agreement with matched tumor samples. Together, these data demonstrate that Firefly could be routinely applied for clinical applications in mCRC patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Silvia Galbiati ◽  
Francesco Damin ◽  
Dario Brambilla ◽  
Lucia Ferraro ◽  
Nadia Soriani ◽  
...  

It is widely accepted that assessing circular tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the plasma of cancer patients is a promising practice to evaluate somatic mutations from solid tumors noninvasively. Recently, it was reported that isolation of extracellular vesicles improves the detection of mutant DNA from plasma in metastatic patients; however, no consensus on the presence of dsDNA in exosomes has been reached yet. We analyzed small extracellular vesicle (sEV)-associated DNA of eleven metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients and compared the results obtained by microarray and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to those reported on the ctDNA fraction. We detected the same mutations found in tissue biopsies and ctDNA in all samples but, unexpectedly, in one sample, we found a KRAS mutation that was not identified either in ctDNA or tissue biopsy. Furthermore, to assess the exact location of sEV-associated DNA (outside or inside the vesicle), we treated with DNase I sEVs isolated with three different methodologies. We found that the DNA inside the vesicles is only a small fraction of that surrounding the vesicles. Its amount seems to correlate with the total amount of circulating tumor DNA. The results obtained in our experimental setting suggest that integrating ctDNA and sEV-associated DNA in mCRC patient management could provide a complete real-time assessment of the cancer mutation status.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 1715-1722 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Tie ◽  
I. Kinde ◽  
Y. Wang ◽  
H.L. Wong ◽  
J. Roebert ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 408-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Osumi ◽  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
Yoshinori Takeda ◽  
Takeru Wakatsuki ◽  
Takashi Ichimura ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S25
Author(s):  
R.R. Narayan ◽  
M.L. Babicky ◽  
D.A. Goldman ◽  
M. Gonen ◽  
P.J. Allen ◽  
...  

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. e175245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Montagut ◽  
Guillem Argilés ◽  
Fortunato Ciardiello ◽  
Thomas T. Poulsen ◽  
Rodrigo Dienstmann ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3506-3506
Author(s):  
Andrea Sartore-Bianchi ◽  
Filippo Pietrantonio ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Benedetta Mussolin ◽  
Francesco Rua ◽  
...  

3506 Background: Despite advances in molecular segmentation of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), beyond RAS status therapeutic actionability remains confined to the limited subgroups of ERBB2 amplified, BRAF mutated and MSI-H patients. Optimization of available treatments is therefore warranted. Rechallenge with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies is often empirically used with some benefit as late-line therapy. We previously found that mutant RAS and EGFR ectodomain clones, which emerge in blood during EGFR blockade, decline upon antibody withdrawal leading to regain drug sensitivity. Based on this rationale, we designed CHRONOS, a multicenter phase II trial of anti-EGFR therapy rechallenge guided by monitoring of the mutational status of RAS, BRAF and EGFR in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). To our knowledge, this is the first interventional clinical trial of liquid biopsy for driving anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy in mCRC. Methods: Eligible patients were PS ECOG 0-2 RAS/BRAF WT mCRC having first achieved an objective response and then progression in any treatment line with an anti-EGFR antibody containing regimen, displaying RAS, BRAF and EGFR ectodomain WT status in ctDNA at molecular screening after progression to the last anti-EGFR-free regimen. Clonal evolution in ctDNA was analyzed by ddPCR and next generation sequencing. Panitumumab 6 mg/kg was administered IV every two weeks until progression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST version 1.1 with independent central review. 27 total patients and 6 responses were required to declare the study positive (power = 85%, type I error = 0.05). Results: Between Aug 19, 2019 and Nov 6, 2020 52 patients were screened by liquid biopsy and 36 (69%) were negative in ctDNA for RAS/BRAF/EGFR mutations. Of these, 27 patients were enrolled in 4 centers. Median age was 64 years (range: 42-80). PS ECOG was 0/50%, 1/46%, 2/4%. Previous anti-EGFR was administered in 1st line in 63%, 2nd in 15% and > 2nd in 22%. Median number of previous treatments was 3. The primary endpoint was met, with 8/27 partial responses (PR) observed (2 unconfirmed) (ORR = 30%, 95% CI: 12-47%). Stable disease (SD) was obtained in 11/27 (40%, 95% CI: 24-59%), lasting > 4 months in 8/11. Disease control rate (PR plus SD > 4 months) was therefore obtained in 16/27 (59%, 95% CI: 41-78%). Median progression-free survival was 16 weeks. Median duration of response was 17 weeks (1 ongoing). Maximal grade toxicity was G3, limited to dermatological and occurring in 19% of patients. ctDNA dynamics were studied in all patients. Conclusions: Liquid biopsy-driven rechallenge with anti-EGFR antibodies leads to further objective responses in one third of patients. Genotyping tumor DNA in the blood to direct therapy can be effectively incorporated in the management of advanced CRCs. Clinical trial information: 2016-002597-12.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document