“Bad News” in Herodotos and Thoukydides: misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Lateiner

Abstract Herodotos and Thoukydides report on many occasions that kings, polis leaders, and other politicians speak and behave in ways that unintentionally announce or analyze situations incorrectly (misinformation). Elsewhere, they represent as facts knowingly false constructs or “fake news” (disinformation), or they slant data in ways that advance a cause personal or public (propaganda, true or false). Historians attempt to or claim to acquaint audiences with a truer fact situation and to identify subjects’ motives for distortion such as immediate personal advantage, community advantage, or to encourage posterity’s better (if mistaken) opinion. Such historiographical bifocalism enhances the historian’s authority with readers (as he sees through intentional or unintentional misrepresentations) as well as sets straight distorted historical records. This paper surveys two paradigmatic Hellenic historians’ texts, how they build their investigative and analytic authority, and how they encourage confidence in their truth-determining skills. The material collected confirms and assesses the frequency of persons and governments misleading their own citizens and subjects as well as rival persons and powers. Finally, it demonstrates that these two historians were aware of information loss, information control (dissemination and suppression), and information chaos.

Author(s):  
Duncan Pritchard

An account is offered of the nature of fake news, and it is explained how this account differs from the main proposals in the contemporary philosophical literature in this regard. One key feature of the account is the idea that fake news is not a genuine form of news. In particular, fake news is to be distinguished from genuine news that is epistemically problematic. It is argued that this point is important because it entails that what is required to differentiate news with a sound epistemic pedigree from news that has a poor epistemic pedigree is distinct from what is required to differentiate genuine news from fake news. This has implications for how we should manage the challenge posed by fake news, at both the individual and the structural levels.


In medias res ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 2803-2811
Author(s):  
Ivana Marasović Šušnjara ◽  
Maja Vejić

All media have been flooded with news related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Top scientists have been addressing the public more frequently than ever before. In addition to positive attitudes, there have also been negative ones. In the midst of the pandemic, information about health systems that cannot respond adequately, a large number of deaths, and the lack of vaccines provoked a number of unwanted reactions, such as fear and associated disorders. Bad news kept coming. They were followed by conspiracy theories. Certain groups set out to find information they wanted to accept as true on various social networks. Should the media be allowed to inform about health without check, should they be allowed to pass on “fake news” in the domain of illness and health, or even manipulate information? They shouldn’t? In order to minimize the negative impacts, there should be mutual responsibility of experts and the media in presenting health-related topics and in disseminating useful and credible information, whereby the media literacy of the end users is indispensable.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melisa Basol ◽  
Jon Roozenbeek ◽  
Sander Van der Linden
Keyword(s):  
Bad News ◽  

2021 ◽  
pp. 240-260
Author(s):  
Debasish Roy Chowdhury ◽  
John Keane

This chapter examines Indian media. Communications scholars have long argued that media sets the agenda for public opinion, first by drawing the attention of citizens to a particular issue, and then by defining it by means of comprehensible media ‘frames’ that act as cognitive shortcuts to understand issues. As in other so-called democracies, journalists working within India’s mainstream media are engaged 24/7 in framing narratives, making them indispensable for any government. Anti-Muslim messaging, generally subtle, has been the default media frame ever since the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) came to power in 2014. This coincided with the coming of communicative abundance, the profusion of new communication networks and technologies, and rapidly changing media consumption habits. Secretive organizations frame sophisticated misinformation campaigns to spread fake news and false claims through social media. In such a media environment marked by features common to despotisms like Vietnam, Iran, and Russia, where independent journalism is all but dead, self-censorship and toad-eating are rife.


2020 ◽  
pp. 001316442094037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Roozenbeek ◽  
Rakoen Maertens ◽  
William McClanahan ◽  
Sander van der Linden

Online misinformation is a pervasive global problem. In response, psychologists have recently explored the theory of psychological inoculation: If people are preemptively exposed to a weakened version of a misinformation technique, they can build up cognitive resistance. This study addresses two unanswered methodological questions about a widely adopted online “fake news” inoculation game, Bad News. First, research in this area has often looked at pre- and post-intervention difference scores for the same items, which may imply that any observed effects are specific to the survey items themselves (item effects). Second, it is possible that using a pretest influences the outcome variable of interest, or that the pretest may interact with the intervention (testing effects). We investigate both item and testing effects in two online studies (total N = 2,159) using the Bad News game. For the item effect, we examine if inoculation effects are still observed when different items are used in the pre- and posttest. To examine the testing effect, we use a Solomon’s Three Group Design. We find that inoculation interventions are somewhat influenced by item effects, and not by testing effects. We show that inoculation interventions are effective at improving people’s ability to spot misinformation techniques and that the Bad News game does not make people more skeptical of real news. We discuss the larger relevance of these findings for evaluating real-world psychological interventions.


We the Gamers ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 157-170
Author(s):  
Karen Schrier

Chapter 10 describes how games may help people practice critical literacy skills such as reading, evaluating, and interpreting information. How is it determined which evidence and data are valid and reliable, and how might games support this? How might games help people to engage with news and current events, or to counter fake news? The chapter includes an overview of why reading and interpreting information matters in civics and ethics, and why games may support this. It also includes the limitations of using games to explore evidence and information, and how to minimize those limitations. Finally, it reviews strategies that teachers can take to use games to practice literacy and information evaluation skills. It opens with the example of the game Factitious, and also shares three examples-in-action: Executive Command, Thoughts and Prayers, and Bad News.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 317-342
Author(s):  
Rui Wang ◽  
Yuan He ◽  
Jing Xu ◽  
Hongzhong Zhang

Circulation ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 135 (15) ◽  
pp. 1413-1416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Plana ◽  
Ana Barac
Keyword(s):  
Bad News ◽  

2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Dosanjh ◽  
Judy Barnes ◽  
Mohit Bhandari

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document