scholarly journals Evaluation of Gravity Data Derived from Global Gravity Field Models Using Terrestrial Gravity Data in Enugu State, Nigeria

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
O.I. Apeh ◽  
E.C. Moka ◽  
V.N. Uzodinma
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Gravity Anomalies ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Bouguer Gravity ◽  
Bouguer Anomalies ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Global Gravity ◽  
Enugu State ◽  
Gravity Field Models

Abstract Spherical harmonic expansion is a commonly applied mathematical representation of the earth’s gravity field. This representation is implied by the potential coeffcients determined by using elements/parameters of the field observed on the surface of the earth and/or in space outside the earth in the spherical harmonic expansion of the field. International Centre for Gravity Earth Models (ICGEM) publishes, from time to time, Global Gravity Field Models (GGMs) that have been developed. These GGMs need evaluation with terrestrial data of different locations to ascertain their accuracy for application in those locations. In this study, Bouguer gravity anomalies derived from a total of eleven (11) recent GGMs, using sixty sample points, were evaluated by means of Root-Mean-Square difference and correlation coeficient. The Root-Mean-Square differences of the computed Bouguer anomalies from ICGEMwebsite compared to their positionally corresponding terrestrial Bouguer anomalies range from 9.530mgal to 37.113mgal. Additionally, the correlation coe_cients of the structure of the signal of the terrestrial and GGM-derived Bouguer anomalies range from 0.480 to 0.879. It was observed that GECO derived Bouguer gravity anomalies have the best signal structure relationship with the terrestrial data than the other ten GGMs. We also discovered that EIGEN-6C4 and GECO derived Bouguer anomalies have enormous potential to be used as supplements to the terrestrial Bouguer anomalies for Enugu State, Nigeria.

scholarly journals Validation of GOCE global gravity field models using terrestrial gravity data in Norway

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Šprlák ◽  
C. Gerlach ◽  
B. Pettersen
Keyword(s):  
Harmonic Analysis ◽  
Gravity Field ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Gravity Anomalies ◽  
Gravity Field Model ◽  
Terrestrial Gravity ◽  
Free Air ◽  
Global Gravity ◽  
Free Air Gravity ◽  
Gravity Field Models

Validation of GOCE global gravity field models using terrestrial gravity data in NorwayThe GOCE (Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer) satellite gravity gradiometry mission maps the Earth's gravity field. Harmonic analysis of GOCE observations provides a global gravity field model (GGFM). Three theoretical strategies, namely the direct, the space-wise and the time-wise approach, have been proposed for GOCE harmonic analysis. Based on these three methods, several GGFMs have been provided to the user community by ESA. Thereby different releases are derived from different periods of GOCE observations and some of the models are based on combinations with other sources of gravity field information. Due to the multitude of GOCE GGFMs, validation against independent data is a crucial task for the quality description of the different models.In this study, GOCE GGFMs from three releases are validated with respect to terrestrial free-air gravity anomalies in Norway. The spectral enhancement method is applied to avoid spectral inconsistency between the terrestrial and the GOCE free-air gravity anomalies.The results indicate that the time-wise approach is a reliable harmonic analysis procedure in all three releases of GOCE models. The space-wise approach, available in two releases, provides similar results as the time-wise approach. The direct approach seems to be highly affected by a-priori information.

scholarly journals Performance Comparison of Geoid Refinement between XGM2016 and EGM2008 Based on the KTH and RCR Methods: Jilin Province, China

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 324
Author(s):  
Qiong Wu ◽  
Hongyao Wang ◽  
Bin Wang ◽  
Shengbo Chen ◽  
Hongqing Li
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Mean Square Error ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Jilin Province ◽  
Mountainous Area ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Plain Area ◽  
Gravity Field Models ◽  
Global Mean

The selection of an appropriate global gravity field model and refinement method can effectively improve the accuracy of the refined regional geoid model in a certain research area. We analyzed the accuracy of Experimental Geopotential Model (XGM2016) based on the GPS-leveling data and the modification parameters of the global mean square errors in the KTH geoid refinement in Jilin Province, China. The regional geoid was refined based on Earth Gravitational Model (EGM2008) and XGM2016 using both the Helmert condensation method with an RCR procedure and the KTH method. A comparison of the original two gravity field models to the GPS-leveling benchmarks showed that the accuracies of XGM2016 and EGM2008 in the plain area of Jilin Province are similar with a standard deviation (STD) of 5.8 cm, whereas the accuracy of EGM2008 in the high mountainous area is 1.4 cm better than that of XGM2016, which may be attributed to its low resolution. The modification parameters between the two gravity field models showed that the coefficient error of XGM2016 model was lower than that of EGM2008 for the same degree of expansion. The different modification limits and integral radii may produce a centimeter level difference in global mean square error, while the influence of the truncation error caused by the integral was at the millimeter level. The terrestrial gravity data error accounted for the majority of the global mean square error. The optimal least squares modification obtained the minimum global mean square error, and the global mean square error calculated based on XGM2016 model was reduced by about 1~3 cm compared with EGM2008. The refined geoid based on the two gravity field models indicated that both KTH and RCR method can effectively improve the STD of the geoid model from about six to three centimeters. The refined accuracy of EGM2008 model using RCR and KTH methods is slightly better than that of XGM2016 model in the plain and high mountain areas after seven-parameter fitting. EGM2008 based on the KTH method was the most precise at ± 2.0 cm in the plain area and ± 2.4 cm in the mountainous area. Generally, for the refined geoid based on the two Earth gravity models, KTH produced results similar to RCR in the plain area, and had relatively better performance for the mountainous area where terrestrial gravity data is sparse and unevenly distributed.

Evaluation of global gravity field models using shipborne free-air gravity anomalies over the Gulf of Guinea, Central Africa

Survey Review ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Kamto Paul Gautier ◽  
Yap Loudi ◽  
Zanga Amougou Alain ◽  
Kandé Houetchak Ludovic ◽  
Nguiya Sévérin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Central Africa ◽  
Gravity Anomalies ◽  
Gulf Of Guinea ◽  
Free Air ◽  
Global Gravity ◽  
Free Air Gravity ◽  
Gravity Field Models

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF THE RECENT HIGH-DEGREE COMBINED GLOBAL GRAVITY-FIELD MODELS FOR GEOID MODELLING OVER KENYA

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-54
Author(s):  
Patroba Achola Odera
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Gravity Anomalies ◽  
Free Air ◽  
Global Gravity ◽  
Data Points ◽  
Standard Deviations ◽  
Free Air Gravity ◽  
High Degree ◽  
Gravity Field Models ◽  
Geoid Undulations

This study carries out an evaluation of the recent high-degree combined global gravity-field models (EGM2008, EIGEN-6C4, GECO and SGG-UGM-1) over Kenya. The evaluation is conducted using observed geoid undulations (18 data points, mainly in Nairobi area) and free-air gravity anomalies (8,690 data points, covering the whole country). All the four models are applied at full spherical harmonic degree expansion. The standard deviations of the differences between observed and GGMs implied geoid undulations at 18 GPS/levelling points over Nairobi area are ±11.62, ±11.48, ±12.51 and ±11.75 cm for EGM2008, EIGEN-6C4, GECO and SGG-UGM-1, respectively. On the other hand, standard deviations of the differences between observed and GGMs implied free-air gravity anomalies at 8,690 data points over Kenya are ±10.11, ±10.03, ±10.19 and ±10.00 mGal for EGM2008, EIGEN-6C4, GECO and SGG-UGM-1, respectively. These results indicate that the recent high-degree global gravity-field models generally perform at the same level over Kenya. However, EIGEN6C4 performs slightly better than EGM2008, GECO and SGG-UGM-1, considering the independent check provided by GPS/levelling data (admittedly over a small area). These results further indicate a good prospect for the development of a precise gravimetric geoid model over Kenya using EIGEN-6C4 by integrating local terrestrial gravity data in a removecompute-restore scheme.

Preliminary monthly gravity field models from kinematic orbits of SWARM Satellites

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingfu Zhang ◽  
Qiujie Chen ◽  
Yunzhong Shen
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Earth System ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Swarm Satellites ◽  
Variable Gravity ◽  
Data Gap ◽  
One Year ◽  
Gravity Recovery ◽  
Gravity Field Models

<p>      Although the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GRACE FO) satellite missions play an important role in monitoring global mass changes within the Earth system, there is a data gap of about one year spanning July 2017 to May 2018, which leads to discontinuous gravity observations for monitoring global mass changes. As an alternative mission, the SWARM satellites can provide gravity observations to close this data gap. In this paper, we are dedicated to developing alternative monthly time-variable gravity field solutions from SWARM data. Using kinematic orbits of SWARM from ITSG for the period January 2015 to September 2020, we have generated a preliminary time series of monthly gravity field models named Tongji-Swarm2019 up to degree and order 60. The comparisons between Tongji-Swarm2019 and GRACE/GRACE-FO monthly solutions show that Tongji-Swarm2019 solutions agree with GRACE/GRACE-FO models in terms of large-scale mass change signals over amazon, Greenland and other regions. We can conclude that Tongji-Swarm2019 monthly gravity field models are able to close the gap between GRACE and GRACE FO.</p>

scholarly journals New insights on the dynamics of the Sumatra and Mariana complexes inferred from the comparative analysis of gravity data and model predictions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arcangela Bollino ◽  
Anna Maria Marotta ◽  
Federica Restelli ◽  
Alessandro Regorda ◽  
Roberto Sabadini
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Gravity Field ◽  
Wide Spectrum ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Gravity Anomalies ◽  
Phase Changes ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Model Predictions ◽  
Dip Angle ◽  
The Masses

<p>Subduction is responsible for surface displacements and deep mass redistribution. This rearrangement generates density anomalies in a wide spectrum of wavelengths which, in turn, causes important anomalies in the Earth's gravity field that are visible as lineaments parallel to the arc-trench systems. In these areas, when the traditional analysis of the deformation and stress fields is combined with the analysis of the perturbation of the gravity field and its slow time variation, new information on the background environment controlling the tectonic loading phase can be disclosed.</p><p>Here we present the results of a comparative analysis between the geodetically retrieved gravitational anomalies, based on the EIGEN-6C4 model, and those predicted by a 2D thermo-chemical mechanical modeling of the Sumatra and Mariana complexes.</p><p>The 2D model accounts for a wide range of parameters, such as the convergence velocity, the shallow dip angle, the different degrees of coupling between the facing plates. The marker in cell technique is used to compositionally differentiate the system. Phase changes in the crust and in the mantle and mantle hydration are also allowed. To be compliant with the geodetic EIGEN-6C4 gravity data, we define a model normal Earth considering the vertical density distribution at the margins of the model domain, where the masses are not perturbed by the subduction process.</p><p>Model predictions are in good agreement with data, both in terms of wavelengths and magnitude of the gravity anomalies measured in the surroundings of the Sumatra and Marina subductions. Furthermore, our modeling supports that the differences in the style of the gravity anomaly observed in the two areas are attributable to the different environments – ocean-ocean or ocean-continental subduction – that drives a significantly different dynamic in the wedge area.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document