The Diagnostic Value of a Brief GnRH Analogue Stimulation Test in Girls with Central Precocious Puberty: A Single 30-minute Post-stimulation LH Sample is Adequate

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
C.P. Houk ◽  
A.R. Kunselman ◽  
P.A. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Precocious Puberty ◽  
Central Precocious Puberty ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Stimulation Test ◽  
Gnrh Analogue ◽  
Minute Post

scholarly journals The Diagnostic Utility of the Basal Luteinizing Hormone Level and Single 60-Minute Post GnRH Agonist Stimulation Test for Idiopathic Central Precocious Puberty in Girls

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruixue Cao ◽  
Jinrong Liu ◽  
Pinguo Fu ◽  
Yonghai Zhou ◽  
Zhe Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Precocious Puberty ◽  
Gnrh Agonist ◽  
Central Precocious Puberty ◽  
Stimulation Test ◽  
Diagnostic Utility ◽  
Gnrh Analogue ◽  
Idiopathic Central Precocious Puberty ◽  
Agonist Stimulation ◽  
Minute Post ◽  
Spearman’S Correlation

ObjectiveThe present study aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of the Luteinizing hormone (LH) levels and single 60-minute post gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist stimulation test for idiopathic central precocious puberty (CPP) in girls.MethodsData from 1,492 girls diagnosed with precocious puberty who underwent GnRH agonist stimulation testing between January 1, 2016, and October 8, 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. LH levels and LH/follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) ratios were measured by immuno-chemiluminescence assay before and at several timepoints after GnRH analogue stimulation testing. Mann–Whitney U test, Spearman’s correlation, χ2 test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic utility of these hormone levels.ResultsThe 1,492 subjects were split into two groups: an idiopathic CPP group (n = 518) and a non-CPP group (n = 974). Basal LH levels and LH/FSH ratios were significantly different between the two groups at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after GnRH analogue stimulation testing. Spearman’s correlation analysis showed the strongest correlation between peak LH and LH levels at 60 minutes after GnRH agonist stimulation (r = 0.986, P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis revealed that the 60-minute LH/FSH ratio yielded the highest consistency, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.988 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.982–0.993) and a cut-off point of 0.603 mIU/L (sensitivity 97.3%, specificity 93.0%). The cut-off points of basal LH and LH/FSH were 0.255 mIU/L (sensitivity 68.9%, specificity 86.0%) and 0.07 (sensitivity 73.2%, specificity 89.5%), respectively, with AUCs of 0.823 (95% CI, 0.799–0.847) and 0.843 (95% CI, 0.819–0.867), respectively.ConclusionsA basal LH value greater than 0.535 mIU/L can be used to diagnose CPP without a GnRH agonist stimulation test. A single 60-minute post-stimulus gonadotropin result of LH and LH/FSH can be used instead of a GnRH agonist stimulation test, or samples can be taken only at 0, 30, and 60 minutes after a GnRH agonist stimulation test. This reduces the number of blood draws required compared with the traditional stimulation test, while still achieving a high level of diagnostic accuracy.

Development of Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms for Girls with Suspected Central Precocious Puberty: Retrospective Study (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyan Pan ◽  
Guangjian Liu ◽  
Xiaojian Mao ◽  
Huixian Li ◽  
Jiexin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Precocious Puberty ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Central Precocious Puberty ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Stimulation Test ◽  
Gnrh Analogue ◽  
Prediction Probability

BACKGROUND Central precocious puberty (CPP) in girls seriously affects their physical and mental development in childhood. The method of diagnosis—gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)–stimulation test or GnRH analogue (GnRHa)–stimulation test—is expensive and makes patients uncomfortable due to the need for repeated blood sampling. OBJECTIVE We aimed to combine multiple CPP–related features and construct machine learning models to predict response to the GnRHa-stimulation test. METHODS In this retrospective study, we analyzed clinical and laboratory data of 1757 girls who underwent a GnRHa test in order to develop XGBoost and random forest classifiers for prediction of response to the GnRHa test. The local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) algorithm was used with the black-box classifiers to increase their interpretability. We measured sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of the models. RESULTS Both the XGBoost and random forest models achieved good performance in distinguishing between positive and negative responses, with the AUC ranging from 0.88 to 0.90, sensitivity ranging from 77.91% to 77.94%, and specificity ranging from 84.32% to 87.66%. Basal serum luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and insulin-like growth factor-I levels were found to be the three most important factors. In the interpretable models of LIME, the abovementioned variables made high contributions to the prediction probability. CONCLUSIONS The prediction models we developed can help diagnose CPP and may be used as a prescreening tool before the GnRHa-stimulation test.

Rapid progressive central precocious puberty: diagnostic and predictive value of basal sex hormone levels and pelvic ultrasound

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 785-791
Author(s):  
Valeria Calcaterra ◽  
Catherine Klersy ◽  
Federica Vinci ◽  
Corrado Regalbuto ◽  
Giulia Dobbiani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Precocious Puberty ◽  
Tanner Stage ◽  
Central Precocious Puberty ◽  
Bone Age ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Sex Hormone ◽  
Pelvic Ultrasound ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Hormone Levels ◽  
Ultrasound Parameters

AbstractObjectivesData on the predictive values of parameters included in the diagnostic work-up for precocious puberty (PP) remain limited. We detected the diagnostic value of basal sex hormone levels, pelvic ultrasound parameters and bone age assessment for activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in girls with PP, in order to help in the decision to perform GnRH testing.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively considered 177 girls with PP. According to puberty evolution, the girls were divided into two groups: rapid progressive central precocious puberty (RP-CPP) and non/slowly progressive/transient forms (SP-PP). In all patients we considered Tanner stage, basal luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol (E2) values, bone age, and pelvis examination. We assessed the diagnostic value of each variable and identified the number of pathological parameters that best identify patients with RP-CPP.ResultsBasal LH ≥ 0.2IU/L, E2 level ≥ 50 pmol/L, uterine longitudinal diameter ≥ 3.5 cm, transverse uterine diameter ≥ 1.5 cm, endometrial echo and ovarian volume ≥ 2 cm3 were significantly associated with RP-CPP (p ≤ 0.01). The ability to diagnose RP-CPP was enhanced with increasing number of pathological hormonal and instrumental parameters (p < 0.001). With more than three parameters detected, sensitivity and specificity reached 58% (95%CI 48–67) and 85% (95%CI 74–92), respectively, with a PPV = 86% (95%CI 76–93) and PPN = 54% (95%CI 43–54); the area under the ROC curve was 0.71 (95%CI 0.65–0.78).ConclusionDespite the availability of different tests, diagnosing RP-CPP remains difficult. A diagnosis model including at least three hormonal and/or ultrasound parameters may serve as a useful preliminary step in selecting patients who require GnRH testing for early detection of RC-PP.

Long-Term Results of GnRH Analogue (Buserelin) Treatment in Girls with Central Precocious Puberty

1985 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 945-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. BRAUNER ◽  
E. THIBAUD ◽  
P. BISCHOF ◽  
PC. SIZONENKO ◽  
R. RAPPAPORT
Keyword(s):  
Precocious Puberty ◽  
Central Precocious Puberty ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Gnrh Analogue ◽  
Buserelin Treatment

scholarly journals The utility of basal serum LH in prediction of central precocious puberty in girls

2012 ◽  
Vol 166 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yehonatan Pasternak ◽  
Michael Friger ◽  
Neta Loewenthal ◽  
Alon Haim ◽  
Eli Hershkovitz
Keyword(s):  
Precocious Puberty ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Central Precocious Puberty ◽  
Stimulation Test ◽  
Breast Development ◽  
Basal Serum ◽  
Serum Lh ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Design And Methods ◽  
Prepubertal Girls

ObjectiveThe mainstay of distinction between prepubertal girls and girls who are suspected of having central precocious puberty (CPP) is based on gonadotropin measurements after a GnRH stimulation test to evaluate hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis maturity. The objective of this study was to determine whether a single basal gonadotropin measurement carries a useful predictive value in verifying or refuting the diagnosis of CPP.Design and methodsBasal serum LH and FSH were measured by a chemiluminescent immunometric assay in a cohort of girls who had been evaluated for CPP before and after GnRH stimulation test. Peak LH levels higher than 5 IU/l were considered a pubertal response.ResultsEighty girls with suspected breast development before 8 years of age were enrolled to the study, out of whom 42 had CPP.Low basal serum LH (≤0.1 IU/l) was sufficient to rule out the diagnosis of CPP in 94.7% of the 38 prepubertal girls; the sensitivity of basal LH levels for this purpose was only 64%. The basal FSH and the basal LH to FSH ratio achieved less efficient predictive value with 76 and 71% sensitivity and 73 and 86% specificity respectively.ConclusionA single basal LH measurement may be adequate to confirm but not to refute the presence of CPP in most of the girls who are evaluated for early pubertal signs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document