scholarly journals Rapid Design Optimization of Multi-Band Antennas by Means of Response Features

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sławomir Kozieł ◽  
Adrian Bekasiewicz

AbstractThis work examines the reduced-cost design optimization of dual- and multi-band antennas. The primary challenge is independent yet simultaneous control of the antenna responses at two or more frequency bands. In order to handle this task, a feature-based optimization approach is adopted where the design objectives are formulated on the basis of the coordinates of so-called characteristic points (or response features) of the antenna response. Due to only slightly nonlinear dependence of the feature points on antenna geometry parameters, optimization can be attained at a low computational cost. Our approach is demonstrated using two antenna structures with the optimum designs obtained in just a few dozen of EM simulations of the respective structure.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 2223 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Hsiao ◽  
Kumar Shivam ◽  
C. L. Chou ◽  
T. Y. Kam

In the design optimization of robot arms, the use of simulation technologies for modeling and optimizing the objective functions is still challenging. The difficulty is not only associated with the large computational cost of high-fidelity structural simulations but also linked to the reasonable compromise between the multiple conflicting objectives of robot arms. In this paper we propose a surrogate-based evolutionary optimization (SBEO) method via a global optimization approach, which incorporates the response surface method (RSM) and multi-objective evolutionary algorithm by decomposition (the differential evolution (DE ) variant) (MOEA/D-DE) to tackle the shape design optimization problem of robot arms for achieving high speed performance. The computer-aided engineering (CAE) tools such as CAE solvers, computer-aided design (CAD) Inventor, and finite element method (FEM) ANSYS are first used to produce the design and assess the performance of the robot arm. The surrogate model constructed on the basis of Box–Behnken design is then used in the MOEA/D-DE, which includes the process of selection, recombination, and mutation, to optimize the robot arm. The performance of the optimized robot arm is compared with the baseline one to validate the correctness and effectiveness of the proposed method. The results obtained for the adopted example show that the proposed method can not only significantly improve the robot arm performance and save computational cost but may also be deployed to solve other complex design optimization problems.


Author(s):  
Christopher Chahine ◽  
Joerg R. Seume ◽  
Tom Verstraete

Aerodynamic turbomachinery component design is a very complex task. Although modern CFD solvers allow for a detailed investigation of the flow, the interaction of design changes and the three dimensional flow field are highly complex and difficult to understand. Thus, very often a trial and error approach is applied and a design heavily relies on the experience of the designer and empirical correlations. Moreover, the simultaneous satisfaction of aerodynamic and mechanical requirements leads very often to tedious iterations between the different disciplines. Modern optimization algorithms can support the designer in finding high performing designs. However, many optimization methods require performance evaluations of a large number of different geometries. In the context of turbomachinery design, this often involves computationally expensive Computational Fluid Dynamics and Computational Structural Mechanics calculations. Thus, in order to reduce the total computational time, optimization algorithms are often coupled with approximation techniques often referred to as metamodels in the literature. Metamodels approximate the performance of a design at a very low computational cost and thus allow a time efficient automatic optimization. However, from the experiences gained in past optimizations it can be deduced that metamodel predictions are often not reliable and can even result in designs which are violating the imposed constraints. In the present work, the impact of the inaccuracy of a metamodel on the design optimization of a radial compressor impeller is investigated and it is shown if an optimization without the usage of a metamodel delivers better results. A multidisciplinary, multiobjective optimization system based on a Differential Evolution algorithm is applied which was developed at the von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics. The results show that the metamodel can be used efficiently to explore the design space at a low computational cost and to guide the search towards a global optimum. However, better performing designs can be found when excluding the metamodel from the optimization. Though, completely avoiding the metamodel results in a very high computational cost. Based on the obtained results in present work, a method is proposed which combines the advantages of both approaches, by first using the metamodel as a rapid exploration tool and then switching to the accurate optimization without metamodel for further exploitation of the design space.


2008 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Li ◽  
G. Li ◽  
S. Azarm

The high computational cost of population based optimization methods, such as multi-objective genetic algorithms (MOGAs), has been preventing applications of these methods to realistic engineering design problems. The main challenge is to devise methods that can significantly reduce the number of simulation (objective∕constraint functions) calls. We present a new multi-objective design optimization approach in which the Kriging-based metamodeling is embedded within a MOGA. The proposed approach is called Kriging assisted MOGA, or K-MOGA. The key difference between K-MOGA and a conventional MOGA is that in K-MOGA some of the design points are evaluated on-line using Kriging metamodeling instead of the actual simulation model. The decision as to whether the simulation or its Kriging metamodel should be used for evaluating a design point is based on a simple and objective criterion. It is determined whether by using the objective∕constraint functions’ Kriging metamodels for a design point, its “domination status” in the current generation can be changed. Seven numerical and engineering examples with different degrees of difficulty are used to illustrate applicability of the proposed K-MOGA. The results show that on the average K-MOGA converges to the Pareto frontier with an approximately 50% fewer number of simulation calls compared to a conventional MOGA.


Author(s):  
Tapabrata Ray

Surrogate-assisted optimization frameworks are of great use in solving practical computationally expensive process-design-optimization problems. In this chapter, a framework for design optimization is introduced that makes use of neural-network-based surrogates in lieu of actual analysis to arrive at optimum process parameters. The performance of the algorithm is studied using a number of mathematical benchmarks to instill confidence on its performance before reporting the results of a springback minimization problem. The results clearly indicate that the framework is able to report optimum designs with a substantially low computational cost while maintaining an acceptable level of accuracy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 2547-2564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leshi Shu ◽  
Ping Jiang ◽  
Li Wan ◽  
Qi Zhou ◽  
Xinyu Shao ◽  
...  

Purpose Metamodels are widely used to replace simulation models in engineering design optimization to reduce the computational cost. The purpose of this paper is to develop a novel sequential sampling strategy (weighted accumulative error sampling, WAES) to obtain accurate metamodels and apply it to improve the quality of global optimization. Design/methodology/approach A sequential single objective formulation is constructed to adaptively select new sample points. In this formulation, the optimization objective is to select a sample point with the maximum weighted accumulative predicted error obtained by analyzing data from previous iterations, and a space-filling criterion is introduced and treated as a constraint to avoid generating clustered sample points. Based on the proposed sequential sampling strategy, a two-step global optimization approach is developed. Findings The proposed WAES approach and the global optimization approach are tested in several cases. A comparison has been made between the proposed approach and other existing approaches. Results illustrate that WAES approach performs the best in improving metamodel accuracy and the two-step global optimization approach has a great ability to avoid local optimum. Originality/value The proposed WAES approach overcomes the shortcomings of some existing approaches. Besides, the two-step global optimization approach can be used for improving the optimization results.


2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 1248-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Issamu Muraoka ◽  
Roberto L. Galski ◽  
Fabiano L. de Sousa ◽  
Fernando M. Ramos

Author(s):  
Johan A. Persson ◽  
Johan Ölvander

AbstractThis paper proposes a method to compare the performances of different methods for robust design optimization of computationally demanding models. Its intended usage is to help the engineer to choose the optimization approach when faced with a robust optimization problem. This paper demonstrates the usage of the method to find the most appropriate robust design optimization method to solve an engineering problem. Five robust design optimization methods, including a novel method, are compared in the demonstration of the comparison method. Four of the five compared methods involve surrogate models to reduce the computational cost of performing robust design optimization. The five methods are used to optimize several mathematical functions that should be similar to the engineering problem. The methods are then used to optimize the engineering problem to confirm that the most suitable optimization method was identified. The performance metrics used are the mean value and standard deviation of the robust optimum as well as an index that combines the required number of simulations of the original model with the accuracy of the obtained solution. These measures represent the accuracy, robustness, and efficiency of the compared methods. The results of the comparison show that sequential robust optimization is the method with the best balance between accuracy and number of function evaluations. This is confirmed by the optimizations of the engineering problem. The comparison also shows that the novel method is better than its predecessor is.


Author(s):  
Erdem Acar ◽  
Nahide Tüten ◽  
Mehmet Ali Güler

The design of lightweight automotive structures has become a prevalent practice in the automotive industry. This study focuses on design optimization of an automobile torque arm subjected to cyclic loading. Starting from an available initial design, the shape of the torque arm is optimized for minimum weight such that the fatigue life of the torque arm does not fall below that of the initial design and the maximum von Mises stress developed in the torque arm does not exceed that of the initial design. The stresses are computed using ANSYS finite element software, and the fatigue life is calculated using the Smith–Watson–Topper model. Surrogate-based optimization approach is used to reduce the computational cost. Optimization results based on global surrogate modeling and successive surrogate modeling approaches are compared. It is found that the successive surrogate modeling approach results in 28.7% weight reduction for the torque arm, whereas the global surrogate modeling approach results in 25.7% weight saving for the torque arm.


Author(s):  
Hesham Kamel ◽  
Ramin Sedaghati ◽  
Mamoun Medraj

Nonlinear finite element simulation is the state of the art tool to assess the crashworthiness performance of current automobile design. Despite all the advancements in today’s computational capabilities, simulations are still extremely computationally expensive. Moreover design optimization for crashworthiness is a highly nonlinear mathematical problem in which both analysis and optimization components are nonlinear and involve highly iterative process. This makes design optimization process prohibitively possible due to the associated unrealistic computational cost. This paper presents a practical approach that enables the designer to conduct design optimization for crashworthiness at an affordable computational cost.


2010 ◽  
Vol 97-101 ◽  
pp. 3531-3535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Hong Ding ◽  
Guo Jie Li

Topology design optimization method of rib layout in box structure is studied by utilizing the structural topology design optimization approach. The box structure is simplified to a hollow box with some parallel bars, two ends of which are connected with the outer loaded panel and the supported panel. The outer loaded panel is set to be the optimal design area, and the density method is applied to solve the topology optimization problem. The optimal material layout of the outer loaded panel decides the existence of the inside bars, and the existed bars form the rib plates. The validity of the suggested method is verified by some typical design problems. The results show that the obtained box structures have much better mechanical and economical performances by comparing with traditional structures, and because the 3-dimentional design problem is changed to a 2-dimentional problem reasonably, the suggested method is effective and has low computational cost.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document