scholarly journals Cooperative optical wavefront engineering with atomic arrays

Nanophotonics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle E. Ballantine ◽  
Janne Ruostekoski

Abstract Natural materials typically interact weakly with the magnetic component of light which greatly limits their applications. This has led to the development of artificial metamaterials and metasurfaces. However, natural atoms, where only electric dipole transitions are relevant at optical frequencies, can cooperatively respond to light to form collective excitations with strong magnetic, as well as electric, interactions together with corresponding electric and magnetic mirror reflection properties. By combining the electric and magnetic collective degrees of freedom, we show that ultrathin planar arrays of atoms can be utilized as atomic lenses to focus light to subwavelength spots at the diffraction limit, to steer light at different angles allowing for optical sorting, and as converters between different angular momentum states. The method is based on coherently superposing induced electric and magnetic dipoles to engineer a quantum nanophotonic Huygens’ surface of atoms, giving full 2π phase control over the transmission, with close to zero reflection.

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (07) ◽  
pp. 819-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. BUSIELLO ◽  
R. V. SABUROVA

The spectrum and damping of collective excitations of a system of electric dipole centers with internal degrees of freedom in glass are calculated. It is shown that one of the collective modes becomes soft, signaling a spin-glass like phase transition in insulating glass. The contribution to the specific heat is determined. The possibility of phase transition from paraelectric to electric pseudospin glass phase in dielectric glass is considered.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Sun ◽  
Minglei Yang ◽  
Baixiao Chen

Sparse planar arrays, such as the billboard array, the open box array, and the two-dimensional nested array, have drawn lots of interest owing to their ability of two-dimensional angle estimation. Unfortunately, these arrays often suffer from mutual-coupling problems due to the large number of sensor pairs with small spacing d (usually equal to a half wavelength), which will degrade the performance of direction of arrival (DOA) estimation. Recently, the two-dimensional half-open box array and the hourglass array are proposed to reduce the mutual coupling. But both of them still have many sensor pairs with small spacing d, which implies that the reduction of mutual coupling is still limited. In this paper, we propose a new sparse planar array which has fewer number of sensor pairs with small spacing d. It is named as the thermos array because its shape seems like a thermos. Although the resulting difference coarray (DCA) of the thermos array is not hole-free, a large filled rectangular part in the DCA can be facilitated to perform spatial-smoothing-based DOA estimation. Moreover, it enjoys closed-form expressions for the sensor locations and the number of available degrees of freedom. Simulations show that the thermos array can achieve better DOA estimation performance than the hourglass array in the presence of mutual coupling, which indicates that our thermos array is more robust to the mutual-coupling array.


1971 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 40-51
Author(s):  
Paul E. Nacozy

AbstractThe numerical integration of systems of differential equations that possess integrals is often approached by using the integrals to reduce the number of degrees of freedom or by using the integrals as a partial check on the resulting solution, retaining the original number of degrees of freedom.Another use of the integrals is presented here. If the integrals have not been used to reduce the system, the solution of a numerical integration may be constrained to remain on the integral surfaces by a method that applies corrections to the solution at each integration step. The corrections are determined by using linearized forms of the integrals in a least-squares procedure.The results of an application of the method to numerical integrations of a gravitational system of 25-bodies are given. It is shown that by using the method to satisfy exactly the integrals of energy, angular momentum, and center of mass, a solution is obtained that is more accurate while using less time of calculation than if the integrals are not satisfied exactly. The relative accuracy is ascertained by forward and backward integrations of both the corrected and uncorrected solutions and by comparison with more accurate integrations using reduced step-sizes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhipeng Li ◽  
Fengzhong Qu ◽  
Yan Wei ◽  
Guowei Yang ◽  
Wen Xu ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 719-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Djerassi

This paper is the third in a trilogy dealing with simple, nonholonomic systems which, while in motion, change their number of degrees-of-freedom (defined as the number of independent generalized speeds required to describe the motion in question). The first of the trilogy introduced the theory underlying the dynamical equations of motion of such systems. The second dealt with the evaluation of noncontributing forces and of noncontributing impulses during such motion. This paper deals with the linear momentum, angular momentum, and mechanical energy of these systems. Specifically, expressions for changes in these quantities during imposition and removal of constraints are formulated in terms of the associated changes in the generalized speeds.


Author(s):  
Z J Goraj

In this paper the advantages and weak points of the analytical and vectorial methods of the derivation of equations of motion for discrete systems are considered. The analytical method is discussed especially with respect to Boltzmann-Hamel equations, as generalized Lagrange equations. The vectorial method is analysed with respect to the momentum equation and to the generalized angular momentum equation about an arbitrary reference point, moving in an arbitrary manner. It is concluded that, for the systems with complicated geometry of motion and a large number of degrees of freedom, the vectorial method can be more effective than the analytical method. The combination of the analytical and vectorial methods helps to verify the equations of motion and to avoid errors, especially in the case of systems with rather complicated geometry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document