scholarly journals Survival outcomes after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer: a systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claramae Shulyn Chia ◽  
Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri ◽  
Vahan Kepenekian ◽  
Delphine Vaudoyer ◽  
Guillaume Passot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Crs And Hipec

AbstractBackground: The current treatment of choice for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer is systemic chemotherapy. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a new aggressive form of loco-regional treatment that is currently being used in pseudomyxoma peritoneii, peritoneal mesothelioma and peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. It is still under investigation for its use in gastric cancer.Methods: The literature between 1970 and 2016 was surveyed systematically through a review of published studies on the treatment outcomes of CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer.Results: Seventeen studies were included in this review. The median survival for all patients ranged from 6.6 to 15.8 months. The 5-years overall survival ranged from 6 to 31%. For patients with complete cytoreduction, the median survival was 11.2 to 43.4 months and the 5-years overall survival was 13 % to 23%. Important prognostic factors were found to be a low peritoneal carcarcinomatosis index (PCI) score and the completeness of cytoreduction.Conclusion: The current evidence suggests that CRS and HIPEC has a role to play in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer. Long term survival has been shown for a select group of patients. However, further studies are needed to validate these results.

Long-term survival in patients with peritoneal metastasized gastric cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: A multi-institutional cohort from PSOGI.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 390-390
Author(s):  
Andreas Brandl ◽  
Yutaka Yonemura ◽  
Olivier Glehen ◽  
Paul H. Sugarbaker ◽  
Beate Rau
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Peritoneal Metastasis ◽  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Crs And Hipec

390 Background: Peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer is relatively common (17%) and is associated with poor survival. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is still controversially discussed, as it has proven an increase in median survival in selected patients, but only a small subgroup reached long-term survival. The aim of this study was to collect and analyze a worldwide cohort of patients treated with CRS and HIPEC with long-term survival in order to explore relevant patient characteristics. Methods: We conducted a questionnaire, which was distributed to all collaborators of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI). Inclusion criteria were: histopathologic proven peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer, treated with CRS and HIPEC, and overall survival > 5 years. Patient, tumor, and therapeutic details were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 29 patients with a mean age of 52.5 years and a mean PCI of 3.2 were included. The overall median survival was 11.0 years (min 5.0; max 27.9). The predictors completeness of cytoreduction (CC-0) and low PCI (PCI < 6) were present in 23/29 patients. 13/29 patients developed at a median of 82.2 months tumor recurrence. Tumor recurrence was associated with inferior median overall survival compared to patients without tumor recurrence (8.8 years vs. not reached; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Long-term survival and even cure are possible in patients with peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer treated with CRS and HIPEC. Completeness of cytoreduction (CC-0) and low PCI seemed to be crucial. Further studies are needed in order to improve existing selection criteria.

Systematic review of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis: A more efficacious way of delivering intraperitoneal chemotherapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5524-5524 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. C. Chua ◽  
G. Robertson ◽  
R. Farrell ◽  
W. Liauw ◽  
T. D. Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Current Evidence

5524 Background: Advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer results in extensive dissemination of tumor within the peritoneal cavity. The current evidence suggests that cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may be a feasible option with potential benefits compared to the current standard of care in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer. Methods: A systematic review of relevant studies before August 2008 was undertaken to document and report its efficacy. Each study was appraised using a predetermined protocol. The quality of studies was assessed. The patient characteristics, protocol of treatment, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and treatment outcomes were synthesized through a narrative review with full tabulation of results of all included studies. Results: In total, 15 non-randomized, observational studies were reviewed, comprising of 512 patients. All patients received HIPEC as part of the combined treatment with cytoreductive surgery. Cisplatin was the most common chemoperfusate. The mortality associated with the treatment ranged from 0 to 10%. The rates of severe morbidity ranged from 0 to 40%. The median time of follow up ranged from 14 to 64 months, the median disease-free survival ranged from 10 to 57 months and the overall median survival ranged from 22 to 64 months. In patients who had an optimal cytoreduction, the median survival ranged from 29 to 66 months, with a 3- and 5-year survival rate that ranged from 35 to 63% and 12 to 66%, respectively. Conclusions: The future for cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in ovarian cancer is promising. More studies are called for to validate the efficacy of this treatment. For it to become generally accepted, the oncology community must commit to a randomized trial. Before this, the current treatment of cytoreductive surgery combined with adjuvant intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy should remain the mainstay of treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Initial Experience in Oaxaca, Mexico

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (9) ◽  
pp. 942-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolando GarcÍA-Matus ◽  
Carlos Alberto HernÁNdez-HernÁNdez ◽  
Omar Leyva-GarcÍA ◽  
Sergio Vásquez-Ciriaco ◽  
Guillermo Flores-Ayala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer Index ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Crs And Hipec

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) has been traditionally considered a terminal disease with median survivals reported in the literature of 6 to 12 months. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are playing an ever increasing role in the treatment of these patients. Excellent results have been achieved in well-selected patients but there is a very steep learning curve when starting a new program. A program for peritoneal surface malignancies in which patients with PC of gastrointestinal or gynecological origin were treated using multi-modality therapy with combinations of systemic therapy, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and HIPEC was initiated in December 2007 at “Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Oaxaca,” Mexico. We present the results of our initial experience. From December 2007 to February 2011, 26 patients were treated with CRS and HIPEC. There were 21 female patients. Most common indication (46%) was recurrent ovarian cancer. Mean duration of surgery was 260 minutes. Mean Peritoneal Cancer Index was 9. Twenty-three (88.5%) patients had a complete cytoreduction. Major morbidity and mortality rates were 19.5 and 3.8 per cent, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 8 days. At a mean follow-up of 20 months, median survival has not been reached. Rigorous preoperative workup, strict selection criteria, and mentoring from an experienced cytoreductive surgeon are mandatory and extremely important when starting a center for PC.

scholarly journals Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Mao ◽  
Zhenmin Huang
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
The Impact

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising approach for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis, but is associated with significant morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. Herein, we review the impact of Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on length of stay (LOS) and early complications in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis.Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched for studies comparing ERAS protocol with control for CRS + HIPEC. Mean difference (MD) and risk ratios (RR) were calculated for LOS and complications respectively.Results: Six retrospective studies were included. Meta-analysis indicated statistically significant reduction in LOS with ERAS (MD: −2.82 95% CI: −3.79, −1.85 I2 = 29% p &lt; 0.00001). Our results demonstrated significantly reduced risk of Calvien Dindo grade III/IV complications with the use of ERAS protocol as compared to the control group (RR: 0.60 95% CI: 0.41, 0.87 I2 = 0% p = 0.007). Pooled analysis of limited studies demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the risk of reoperation (RR: 1.04 95% CI: 0.54, 2.03 I2 = 50% p = 0.90) readmission (RR: 0.55 95% CI: 0.21, 1.49 I2 = 0% p = 0.24), acute kidney injury (RR: 0.55 95% CI: 0.28, 1.10 I2 = 0% p = 0.09) or mortality (RR: 0.62 95% CI: 0.17, 2.26 I2 = 0% p = 0.46) between the study groups.Conclusion: For CRS + HIPEC, ERAS is associated with significantly reduced LOS along with lower incidence of complications. Limited data suggest that use of ERAS protocol is not associated with increased readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates in these patients. There is a need for randomized controlled trials to corroborate the current evidence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document