Immune Activation after Apicoectomy: Comparison between Patients with and without Prophylactic Antibiotic Therapy

Pteridines ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 192-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ch. Andersson ◽  
Th. Bernhart ◽  
M. Hönlinger ◽  
G. Mailath ◽  
H. Wachter ◽  
...  

Summary In humans neopterin concentrations represent a sensItive index of cell-mediated immune activation. In a previous study, we found significantly increasing neopterin concentrations in patients after dental extractions. In this study, we investigated whether prophylactic antibiotic treatment of patients influenced the course of neopterin levels in patients with apicoectomy. Urinary neopterin concentrations were monitored in 23 patients with apicoectomy in the front region. Urine samples were collected before and on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 after apicoectomy. Six patients received antibiotic therapy, 17 were without such treatment. We found that average neopterin concentrations increased preferentially in patients not treated with antibiotics whereas pateints treated with antibiotics showed only a moderate increase of neopterin levels which returned to normal within three days. We conclude that antibiotic treatment is able to reduce immune activation which is frequently seen in patients after apicoectomy, and we assume this maybe also true in patients after dental extractions. Most likely transient bacteraemia is the cause of immune activation in such patients. However, an inhibitory influence of antibiotics on cytokine cascades cannot be ruled out.

2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myriam Safrai ◽  
Doron Kabiri ◽  
Rani Haj-Yahya ◽  
Adi Reuveni-Salzman ◽  
Michal Lipschuetz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-361
Author(s):  
Pei-Yi Fan ◽  
Ming-Jen Chan ◽  
Sheng-Hsuan Lin ◽  
Hsin-Hsu Wu ◽  
Ming-Yang Chang ◽  
...  

BackgroundPeritonitis is a serious complication after invasive procedures in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). Most studies that have investigated peritonitis following invasive gynecologic procedures enrolled small patient populations. This study focuses on the clinical presentation, outcomes, and effects of prophylactic antibiotic use before invasive techniques.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent invasive gynecologic procedures between 2005 and 2015 in a tertiary medical center. Eligible patients were identified and enrolled and their demographic data were collected. The use of prophylactic antibiotics and the outcomes of peritonitis were recorded.ResultsTwenty-six gynecologic procedures were performed on 18 PD patients. Seven episodes of peritonitis occurred in 6 patients after invasive gynecologic procedures. Eleven procedures were preceded by prophylactic antibiotic treatment (6 oral cefadroxil, 1 oral cefuroxime, 1 oral clindamycin, 1 intravenous [IV] ceftriaxone, 1 IV ceftazidime, and 1 IV cefazolin). The pathogens were diverse (group B Streptococcus, group D Streptococcus, E. coli, and Enterococcus). All episodes of peritonitis were successfully treated using intraperitoneal antibiotics without recurrence, technique failure, or mortality. The odds ratio of peritonitis in the non-prophylaxis group was 20.29 (95% confidence interval 1.01 – 406.35, p = 0.0103).ConclusionThe use of prophylactic antibiotic treatment considerably reduced the risk of peritonitis after invasive gynecologic procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document