scholarly journals Development and Preparation of Oral Suspensions for Paediatric Patients – a Challenge for Pharmacists

2018 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia Bruns ◽  
Michael Ober

Abstract The preparation of liquid oral dosage forms for paediatric patients may pose a challenge on pharmacies. Marketed ready-to-use suspension vehicles do have advantages and disadvantages. In order to overcome the disadvantages a dedicated suspension vehicle, which can be prepared by every pharmacy, was cooperatively developed by pharmacist specialists on a national level in Germany. Marketed as well as pharmacy prepared suspension vehicles provide added value for pharmacy preparations for the special need of paediatric patients of different age groups.

Author(s):  
Mangesh Pradeep Kulkarni ◽  
Arun Sharma ◽  
Sagar Tanwar ◽  
Parashara Bhattar Vandana ◽  
Sheetu Wadhwa ◽  
...  

Abstract: Pharmaceutical oral dosage forms are tremendously preferred by both consumers as well as pharmaceutical manufacturers owing to the plethora of benefits they offer. Lozenges (LZs) are one of the dosage forms that provide a palatable means of drug administration and have great importance with respect to their pharmaceutical applications. LZs offer additional benefits to pediatric and geriatric patients, along with people having associated problems with the gastro-intestinal tract. Dysphagia is a common problem faced by all age groups, which gives rise to the need for LZs. Moreover, the foremost merit presented by the medicated LZs includes its augmented retention time in the oral cavity that results in an enhanced bioavailability for buccal or upper gastro-intestinal disorders. Further, LZs can also be used to bypass the first-pass effect. The present review covers various aspects of LZs such as formulation, manufacturing techniques, evaluation parameters, marketed products, patents, and a compilation of research work that has been done on lozenges as a delivery system.


2013 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 833-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah K. Batchelor ◽  
Richard Kendall ◽  
Sabine Desset-Brethes ◽  
Rainer Alex ◽  
Terry B. Ernest

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (9) ◽  
pp. e18.2-e19
Author(s):  
Anna Kinsella

AimMost paediatric formulations produced for children are generally liquids or powders for reconstitution. Palatability of liquid formulations is often cited as a barrier to medication adherence.1 An alternative to liquid formulations is the conventional solid oral dosage forms, such as tablets or capsules. However, another barrier faced by paediatric patients is the inability to swallow tablets.2 This presents a number of challenges for children with ALL, as treatment contains a phase of extended ‘maintenance’ therapy to prevent relapse. This involves taking oral chemotherapy daily, ± monthly chemotherapy injections, over 2 years for girls and 3 years for boys. Prior to 2014, paediatric oncology pharmacists would work with children refusing to take or struggling with their liquid medicines. It was a simple approach, where ‘tic-tacs®’ were used and swallowinSg these was practiced together. Through education sessions and informal discussions with nursing, medical and play therapists, a culture evolved in 2014 whereby medicine taking was not just the responsibility of pharmacy but of the wider team. Nursing and medical staff were actively involved identifying families that needed support with their medicines. Display boards were created advertising the option of tablets for different medicines and highlighting the different swallowing techniques. The play specialists became ‘Medicine Champions’ using novel approaches to provide children with the tools, confidence and ability to take tablets. Children who successfully mastered swallowing tablets were presented a ‘star award’ certificate for their achievement. Photographs of children with their certificates were displayed in the outpatient clinic.MethodPaediatric patients diagnosed with ALL between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively identified using chemotherapy prescriptions, patient’s medical notes and electronic patient medical records. Data collected included age at diagnosis, formulation choice initiated on and whether patients switched formulations during the course of their treatment. Children were excluded for the following reasons: if they had a history of swallowing difficulties/choking, if the child had learning difficulties or if the child was deceased.Results172 patients were diagnosed with ALL between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2017; 14 patients were excluded (13 deceased,1 learning difficulties). The percentage of children aged 3–12 years taking tablets in 2012 and 2013 was 41% (n=7) and 20% (n=2) respectively. This increased to 69% (n=11) in 2014, remained consistently above 60% in 2015/2016 and increased again to 76% (n=14) in 2017. Between 2014 and 2017, 100% of patient’s ≥ 6 years took their oral chemotherapy as tablets. Over 65% of all patients 0 – 18 years were taking liquids in 2012/2013. From 2014 to 2017 less than 50% of all patients each year were taking liquids. No patients were identified as switching back from tablets to liquid.ConclusionThis study supports an interdisciplinary approach to tablet taking. By bringing together different members of staff with the necessary knowledge, skills and experiences, we were able to provide families with the tools and confidence to support their child in mastering the technique of swallowing tablets, increasing the number of patients initiating on or transitioning to solid oral dosage forms by approximately 50%.ReferencesBaguley D, et al. Prescribing for children – taste and palatability affect adherence to antibiotics: a review. Arch Dis Childhood, 2012;97:293–7.Polaha J. Dalton WT III, Lancaster BM. Parental report of medication acceptance among youth: implications for everyday practice. South Med J. 2008;101:1106–1112.


2021 ◽  
pp. archdischild-2021-322604
Author(s):  
Varsha Pokharkar ◽  
Manjusha Sajith ◽  
Thibault Vallet ◽  
Shruti Akshantal ◽  
Rathin Shah ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe understanding of acceptability of existing dosage forms is limited in most of the world and hinders the development of acceptable, age‐appropriate medicines. The attributes of paediatric medicine acceptability may differ from country to country based on culture, healthcare infrastructure and health policies. This study was designed to map the acceptability of oral medicines in paediatric patients treated in hospital in India.MethodsAn observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in patients aged below 18 years and taking any form of oral medication. Acceptability scores were obtained using CAST–ClinSearch Acceptability Score Test tool.Findings490 patients were recruited and 193 evaluations of different pharmaceutical products available in 20 dosage forms and 7 routes of administration were studied. Oral liquids (50%) and tablets (35%) were the most commonly prescribed and administered forms. Regardless of the therapeutic class and age, the oral liquids were ‘positively accepted’ in infants and toddlers. Acceptability of tablets improved with age and appeared to be generally good from the age of 6.ConclusionThis study indicates the limited progress towards adoption of age-appropriate dosage forms in India and thus impact on the acceptability of existing oral dosage forms. The key challenges posed by the adoption of age-appropriate formulations in India are (1) awareness of importance of appropriate administration and acceptability of medicines to children in India, (2) availability of age-appropriate dosage forms and (3) lack of child-appropriate medicine policies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 3606-3612
Author(s):  
Sachin Sarashetti ◽  
Vikas Jain ◽  
Gowda D V ◽  
Pooja Mallya ◽  
Satish Babu

Solid oral dosage forms are most suitable dosage forms; preferably tablets are widely accepted by people of different age groups. Mini tablets are tablets with a diameter equal to or smaller than 2–3 mm. Mini tablets are multiple unit dosage forms and are advantageous than pellets or any other oral dosage forms as they are easy to manufacture and stability problems are less. Many types of mini tablets are there like bio adhesive mini tablets, pH responsive mini tablets, gastro retentive mini tablets, paediatric mini tablets, oral disintegrating mini tablets. Current ODT developments meet multiple pharmaceutical and patient needs, including better life-cycle management to easy treatment for paediatric, geriatric and psychiatric dysphagic patients. Orally disintegrating dosage forms are X suitable for patients, especially who find it inconvenient to swallow traditional tablets and capsules with an 8-oz glass of water for one reason or another. These essentially reduce the variation between subjects. Mini tablets which disintegrate orally can be evaluated by testing for dissolution, disintegrating testing and hardness. The need for non-invasive delivery systems continues due to the poor acceptance and enforcement by patients of current delivery schemes, limited market space for drug companies and product usage, coupled with high disease management costs. The review emphasizes on advantages of mini tablets, types, methods of manufacturing and modes of administration and evaluation of mini tablets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document