scholarly journals Environmental Enrichment Confers Stress Resiliency to Social Defeat through an Infralimbic Cortex-Dependent Neuroanatomical Pathway

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (16) ◽  
pp. 6159-6173 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. L. Lehmann ◽  
M. Herkenham
2021 ◽  
pp. 100413
Author(s):  
Marina D. Reguilón ◽  
Carmen Ferrer-Pérez ◽  
Carmen Manzanedo ◽  
José Miñarro ◽  
Marta Rodríguez-Arias

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 987-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn J. McQuaid ◽  
Marie-Claude Audet ◽  
Shlomit Jacobson-Pick ◽  
Hymie Anisman

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke N. Dulka ◽  
Elena D. Bagatelas ◽  
Kimberly S. Bress ◽  
J. Alex Grizzell ◽  
Megan K. Cannon ◽  
...  

F1000Research ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A Westwood ◽  
Phillip K Darcy ◽  
Michael H Kershaw

The effect of environmental enrichment (EE) on a variety of physiologic and disease processes has been studied in laboratory mice. During EE, a large group of mice are housed in larger cages than the standard cage and are given toys and equipment, enabling more social contact, and providing a greater surface area per mouse, and a more stimulating environment. Studies have been performed into the effect of EE on neurogenesis, brain injury, cognitive capacity, memory, learning, neuronal pathways, diseases such as Alzheimer’s, anxiety, social defeat, emotionality, depression, drug addiction, alopecia, and stereotypies. In the cancer field, three papers have reported effects on mice injected with tumors and housed in enriched environments compared with those housed in standard conditions. One paper reported a significant decrease in tumor growth in mice in EE housing. We attempted to replicate this finding in our animal facility, because the implications of repeating this finding would have profound implications for how we house all our mice in our studies on cancer. We were unable to reproduce the results in the paper in which B16F10 subcutaneous tumors of mice housed in EE conditions were smaller than those of mice housed in standard conditions. The differences in results could have been due to the different growth rate of the B16F10 cultures from the different laboratories, the microbiota of the mice housed in the two animal facilities, variations in noise and handling between the two facilities, food composition, the chemical composition of the cages or the detergents used for cleaning, or a variety of other reasons. EE alone does not appear to consistently result in decreased tumor growth, but other factors would appear to be able to counteract or inhibit the effects of EE on cancer progression.


2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn J. McQuaid ◽  
Marie-Claude Audet ◽  
Shlomit Jacobson-Pick ◽  
Hymie Anisman

Abstract Social defeat in mice is a potent stressor that promotes the development of depressive- and anxiety-like behaviours, as well as variations of neuroendocrine and brain neurotransmitter activity. Although environmental enrichment may protect against some of the adverse behavioural and biological effects of social defeat, it seems that, among male group-housed mice maintained in an enriched environment (EE), aggressive behaviours may be more readily instigated, thus promoting distress and exacerbating psychopathological features. Thus, although an EE can potentially have numerous beneficial effects, these may depend on the general conditions in which mice were raised. It was observed in the current investigations that EE group-housed BALB/cByJ mice displayed increased anxiety-like behaviours compared to their counterparts maintained in a standard environment (SE). Furthermore, in response to social defeat, EE group-housed male mice exhibited decreased weight gain, exaggerated corticosterone elevations and altered hippocampal norepinephrine utilization compared to their SE counterparts. These effects were not apparent in the individually housed EE mice and, in fact, enrichment among these mice appeared to buffer against serotonin changes induced by social defeat. It is possible that some potentially beneficial effects of enrichment were precluded among group-housed mice, possibly owing to social disturbances that might occur in these conditions. In fact, even if social interaction is an essential feature of enrichment, it seems that some of the positive effects of this housing condition might be optimal when mice are housed individually, particularly with regard to buffering the effects of social defeat.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathy May Tran ◽  
Madeleine Broder ◽  
Suzannah Luft ◽  
Michael L. Schwartz ◽  
Karen Muller Smith ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sgoifo ◽  
S. F. de Boer ◽  
B. Buwalda ◽  
F. Maes ◽  
J. M. Koolhaas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document