Mounting an individual submicrometer sized single crystal

1996 ◽  
Vol 211 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Neder ◽  
M. Burghammer ◽  
Th. Grasl ◽  
H. Schulz
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Single Crystal ◽  
Single Crystals ◽  
High Vacuum ◽  
Nanometer Resolution ◽  
Micro Manipulator ◽  
Scanning Electron

AbstractWe developed a new micro manipulator for mounting individual sub-micrometer sized single crystals within a scanning electron microscope. The translations are realized via a commercially available piezomicroscope, adapted for high vacuum usage and realize nanometer resolution. With this novel instrument it is routinely possible to mount individual single crystals with sizes down to 0.1

Universal ESEM

1993 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 786-787
Author(s):  
G.D. Danilatos
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
High Vacuum ◽  
Natural Extension ◽  
Necessary Condition ◽  
Environmental Scanning ◽  
Detection Systems ◽  
Small Gain ◽  
Detection Medium ◽  
Scanning Electron

The environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) has evolved as the natural extension of the scanning electron microscope (SEM), both historically and technologically. ESEM allows the introduction of a gaseous environment in the specimen chamber, whereas SEM operates in vacuum. One of the detection systems in ESEM, namely, the gaseous detection device (GDD) is based on the presence of gas as a detection medium. This might be interpreted as a necessary condition for the ESEM to remain operational and, hence, one might have to change instruments for operation at low or high vacuum. Initially, we may maintain the presence of a conventional secondary electron (E-T) detector in a "stand-by" position to switch on when the vacuum becomes satisfactory for its operation. However, the "rough" or "low vacuum" range of pressure may still be considered as inaccessible by both the GDD and the E-T detector, because the former has presumably very small gain and the latter still breaks down.

Microstructures of Low Angle Boundaries of the Second Generation Single Crystal Superalloy DD6

2011 ◽  
Vol 284-286 ◽  
pp. 1584-1587
Author(s):  
Zhen Xue Shi ◽  
Jia Rong Li ◽  
Shi Zhong Liu ◽  
Jin Qian Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Thin Layer ◽  
Single Crystal ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Single Crystal Superalloy ◽  
Transition Electron ◽  
Scanning Electron

The specimens of low angle boundaries were machined from the second generation single crystal superalloy DD6 blades. The microstructures of low angle boundaries (LAB) were investigated from three scales of dendrite, γ′ phase and atom with optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscope (SEM), transition electron microscope (TEM) and high resolution transmission electrion microscopy (HREM). The results showed that on the dendrite scale LAB is interdendrite district formed by three dimensional curved face between the adjacent dendrites. On the γ′ phase scale LAB is composed by a thin layer γ phase and its bilateral imperfect cube γ′ phase. On the atom scale LAB is made up of dislocations within several atom thickness.

scholarly journals Why Pressure Scales Cause So Much Confusion

1993 ◽  
Vol 1 (8) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
Anthony D. Buonaquisti
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Ambient Pressure ◽  
High Vacuum ◽  
Ultra High Vacuum ◽  
Vacuum System ◽  
Scanning Auger Microprobe ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Scanning Electron

Pressure scales can be extremely confusing to new operators. This is not surprising. To my mind, there are three primary areas of confusion.Firstly, the pressure of gas inside an instrument changes over many orders of magnitude during pumpdown. The change is about 9 orders of magnitude for a traditional Scanning Electron Microscope and about 13 orders of magnitude for an ultra-high vacuum instrument such as a Scanning Auger Microprobe.To give an idea about the scale of change involved in vacuum, consider that the change in going from ambient pressure to that inside a typical ultra high vacuum system is like comparing one meter with the mean radius of the planet Pluto's orbit. The fact is that we don't often get to play with things on that scale. As a consequence, many of us have to keep reminding ourselves that 1 X 10-3 is one thousand times the value of 1 X 10-6 - not twice the value.

scholarly journals Why Pressure Scales Cause So Much Confusion

2001 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-27
Author(s):  
Anthony D. Buonaquisti
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
High Vacuum ◽  
Ultra High Vacuum ◽  
Scanning Auger Microprobe ◽  
Scanning Electron

Pressure scales can be extremely confusing to new operators. This is not surprising. To my mind, there are three primary areas of confusion.Firstly, the pressure of gas inside an instrument changes over many orders of magnitude during pump-down. The change is about 9 orders of magnitude for a traditional Scanning Electron Microscope and about 13 orders of magnitude for an ultra-high vacuum instrument such as a Scanning Auger Microprobe.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document