scholarly journals Multi-criteria decision making for determining landfill location in Malaka Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province of Indonesia

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 3405-3413
Author(s):  
Leonarda Sofiani Rame ◽  
W Widiatmaka ◽  
Arief Hartono ◽  
Irman Firmansyah
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Soil Depth ◽  
Land Suitability ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Suitability Analysis ◽  
Soil Drainage ◽  
Illegal Waste Disposal ◽  
Illegal Waste ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Stone Type

The absence of a landfill has increased the illegal waste disposal sites in Malaka Regency, which was established between 2013 and 2021. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze suitable and available land for the development of a landfill. The methodology used consisted of 2 analysis steps, namely land suitability and land availability. Land suitability was analyzed using a multi-criteria decision-making method, which included the slope, stone type/geology, lithology, soil type, soil texture, soil depth, soil drainage, distance from settlements, and water sources. The criteria were then weighted using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and geographic information system for overlaying. Furthermore, the results of the land suitability analysis were used to determine its availability with the aid of spatial and regional planning (RTRW), land use, and forest area maps. The results showed that the highly suitable (S1) and available terrain for the landfill in Malaka Regency covered an area of 203.37 ha or 1.73% of the regency. Also, the analysis results indicated that there was still adequate land available for the landfill.

scholarly journals SITE SUITABILITY ANALYSIS FOR INDUSTRIES USING GIS AND MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING

2018 ◽  
Vol IV-5 ◽  
pp. 447-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
S. Saran ◽  
K. V. Ramana
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Land Use Changes ◽  
Arable Land ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Suitability Analysis ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
The People ◽  
Manufacturing Sectors ◽  
Hierarchy Process

<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Developing countries have to be very cautious in utilizing the land as they affect the food security, cause damage to environment and an ecological imbalance might be created in the process of establishing industries to raise the standard of living of the people from poverty. India, as a developing nation with sufficient amount of arable land at present is producing surplus food which is sufficient for all the population, in the recent decades loosing productive agricultural land without proper scientific solution for industries. This is a major concern because it causes not only food scarcity but dependency on the other nations even though we have lot of industries. We need to maintain a balance between Agriculture and manufacturing sectors to have smooth run of the country’s economy. The purpose of the study is to assess the land use changes in the areas for recent years which have potential for industrial establishment through land suitability analysis (LSA) to emphasize both agriculture and industries with sustainable development. Geographic information Systems (GIS) and Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) are combined to distinctly identify the suitable zones for industries. Six criteria in Analytical hierarchy Process (AHP) and nine criteria in Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are evaluated by spatial analysis using ArcGIS software. Considerable amount of productive agricultural land is diverted to non agricultural purposes during last 12 years i.e., from 2004&amp;ndash;2016, which is at first taken for industrial establishment. Results obtained by the methodology we followed have given considerable accuracy by cross checking the previously established industries with suitability regions. Thus GIS and MCDM can assist the policy makers and planning officials to get a better overview with the resources they possess to carry forward with less damage to environment and agricultural land.</p>

scholarly journals Land suitability analysis for rice cultivation using a GIS-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach: central part of Amol District, Iran

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (No. 1) ◽  
pp. 29-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Maddahi ◽  
A. Jalalian ◽  
M.M. Kheirkhah Zarkesh ◽  
N. Honarjo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Land Suitability ◽  
Rice Cultivation ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Suitability Analysis ◽  
Analytical Hierarchical Process ◽  
Land Suitability Analysis ◽  
Suitability Map ◽  
Land Use Maps

Land suitability analysis and preparing land use maps is one of the most beneficial applications of the Geographic Information System (GIS) in planning and managing land recourses. The main objective of this study was to develop a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making technique integrated with the GIS to assess suitable areas for rice cultivation in Amol District, Iran. Several suitability factors including soil properties, climatic conditions, topography, and accessibility were selected based on the FAO framework and experts’ opinions. A fuzzy analytical hierarchical process (FAHP) was used to determine the weights of the various criteria. The GIS was used to overlay and generate criteria maps and a land suitability map. The study area has been classified into four categories of rice cultivation suitability (highly suitable, suitable, moderately suitable, and unsuitable). The present study has attempted to introduce and use the FAHP method to land suitability analysis and to select lands in order to be used as best as possible. Areas that are classified as highly suitable and suitable for rice cultivation constitute about 59.8% of the total area of the region. The results of the present research indicate that the FAHP is an efficient strategy to increase the accuracy of the weight of the criteria affecting the analysis of land suitability.

THE INTEGRATION OF ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS AND DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS IN A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING PROBLEM

2006 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. 263-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
NORITA AHMAD ◽  
DANIEL BERG ◽  
GENE R. SIMONS
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Decision Tool ◽  
Manufacturing Enterprises ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Hierarchy Process

This research focuses on developing a model that can be used to assess the performance of Small to Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprises (SMEs). The model will result from the integration of a decision tool called the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and a data analysis model called Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). This research demonstrates that by eliminating flaws and taking advantage of each methodology's specific characteristics in identifying and solving problems, the new integrated AHP/DEA model appears to be a logical and sensible solution in multi-criteria decision-making problem.

Some Conflicting Results in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 465-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ardalan Bafahm ◽  
Minghe Sun
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Unexpected Result ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Preference Relations ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been believed to be one of the most pragmatic and widely accepted methods for multi-criteria decision making. However, there have been various criticisms of this method within the last four decades. In this study, the results of AHP contradicting common expectations are examined for both the distributive and ideal modes. Specifically, conflicting priorities, conflicting decisions, and conflicting preference relations are investigated. A decision-making scenario is used throughout the paper and an illustrative example constructed from the decision-making scenario is provided to demonstrate each of the conflicting results recommended by AHP. With a parametric formulation of each unexpected result, the possibility of unexpected results of AHP is generalized irrespective of applying the distributive or ideal mode. The logic and causes of these contradictions are also analyzed. This study shows that AHP is not always reliable, and could lead the decision makers towards incorrect decisions.

Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Application to E-Marketplace Selection

2013 ◽  
pp. 26-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beyza Ahlatcioglu Ozkok ◽  
Elisa Pappalardo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Linguistic Variables ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Electronic Parts ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Making decisions is a part of daily life. The nature of decision-making includes multiple and usually conflicting criteria. Multi Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) problems are handled under two main headings: Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) and Multi Objective Decision Making (MODM). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a widely used multi-criteria decision making approach and has successfully been applied to many practical problems. Traditional AHP requires exact or crisp judgments (numbers). However, due to the complexity and uncertainty involved in real world decision problems, decision makers might be more reluctant to provide crisp judgments than fuzzy ones. Furthermore, even when people use the same words, individual judgments of events are invariably subjective, and the interpretations that they attach to the same words may differ. This is why fuzzy numbers and fuzzy sets have been introduced to characterize linguistic variables. Here, the authors overview the most known fuzzy AHP approaches and their application, and they present a case study to select an e-marketplace for a firm, which produces and sells electronic parts of computers in Turkey.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document