scholarly journals Ralph W. Schreiber Conservation Award, 2010: Long-term Northern Spotted Owl Demographic Research Team

The Auk ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 194-195
1994 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Lindenmayer ◽  
Tony W. Norton

Aspects of the conservation and management of the endangered species Leadbeater's Possum Gymnobelideus leadbeateri in southeastern Australia and the Northern Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis caurina in the Pacific north-west of the USA are similar in their nature and the intensity of public debate. Both species occur in temperate forests that are also used for intensive wood production. Due to historial factors and present forestry management regimes, a major conflict in land-use exists between the conservation of these animals and intensive timber harvesting in both geographic regions. The long-term persistence of Leadbeater's Possum and the Northern Spotted Owl will depend primarily on the protection and appropriate management of mature and old growth stands or attributes of such types of forest. The Interagency Spotted Owl Scientific Committee developed a set of guiding biological principles and used knowledge of the autecology and natural history of the species to formulate a management plan to help ensure the viability of populations of the Northern Spotted Owl beyond the next century. Unfortunately, the strategies currently proposed for the conservation of Leadbeater's Possum are unlikely to ensure its long-term persistence, and, therefore, the Victorian Government's position on this matter is inconsistent with its undertakings in the new National Forest Policy. We discuss the application of the approach and strategies proposed by the Interagency Committee to the conservation of Leadbeater's Possum. Attempts to manage the Northern Spotted Owl and Leadbeater's Possum will reflect the ability of governments to pursue truly ecologically sustainable development and resource use.


Author(s):  
R. Gutierrez ◽  
Sarah Rinkevich

The recent listing of the Northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a threatened species (Federal Register 1990) raises heated debate concerning the long-term survival of the species and perceived economic cost to timber industry (Thomas et al. 1988). Long term studies of the owls's ecology are necessary to provide information needed for ecologically based management plans (Dawson et al. 1987). Much is already known about the natural and life history of the Northern spotted owl (Forsman et al. 1984, Gutierrez et al. 1984, Gutierrez 1985, Franklin et al. 1990) as well as the California subspecies (S. o. occidentalis) (Gutierrez and Pritchard 1990). In contrast, the Mexican spotted owl (S. o. Iucida) is the least studied of the three subspecies (Ganey and Balda 1989). It is known that this latter subspecies inhabits rocky canyonlands and coniferous forests in the southwestern United States and Mexico (Kertell1977, Wagner et al. 1982, Webb 1983, Johnson and Johnson 1985, Ganey 1988, and Skaggs 1988) but there are few published studies on its ecology and habitat needs (Ganey 1988). Also, the effects of human activities, such as recreation, on the Mexican subspecies are unclear, particularly in isolated habitats (Gutierrez 1985). Therefore, in 1989, we initiated a two year investigation of abundance and distribution of Mexican spotted owls in Zion National Park. This report summarizes our 1990 survey effort and research findings.


Ecosphere ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. art65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa S. Hayward ◽  
Ann E. Bowles ◽  
James C. Ha ◽  
Samuel K. Wasser

2015 ◽  
Vol 358 ◽  
pp. 355-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Dunk ◽  
Brian Woodbridge ◽  
Elizabeth M. Glenn ◽  
Raymond J. Davis ◽  
Katherine Fitzgerald ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan B. Franklin ◽  
David R. Anderson ◽  
R. J. Gutiérrez ◽  
Kenneth P. Burnham

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. e12131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin N. Bodine ◽  
Alex Capaldi

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
Chad A. Marks-Fife ◽  
Eric D. Forsman ◽  
Katie M. Dugger

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S802-S803
Author(s):  
Barbara Hanratty ◽  
Rachel Stocker ◽  
Katie Brittain

Abstract Patients and the public are involved in health and social care research more than ever before. Much effort has been put into developing patient and public involvement (PPI), and promoting co-production of research with patients and the public. Yet there is little guidance for researchers on how to involve PPI partners in the research process, or how involvement can be judged as meaningful. This presentation has its origins in the attempts of one research team to question and navigate a way of involving PPI in long term care research. In this presentation, we describe our model of collaborative qualitative data analysis with PPI partners, in a study exploring primary care services for older adults living in long-term care facilities in England. Anonymised interview transcript excerpts were presented in written, audio, and role-play format to our PPI partners. PPI partners derived meaning from interview data, identifying, confirming and critiquing emerging themes. Their input at this critical stage of the study deepened our initial analysis and prompted the research team to new and different interpretations of the data. This talk addresses ways of engaging PPI partners in innovative ways during data analysis, and offers other researchers some questions, challenges and potential principles for effective practice. We conclude that in areas such as long term care, with multiple stakeholders and a dynamic environment, effective PPI may be flexible, messy and difficult to define.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document