scholarly journals VIEWS OF SERVICE PROVIDERS ON SERVICES RENDERED TO PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES AND ON THE NEED FOR FAMILY PRESERVATION SERVICES

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Strydom
Author(s):  
Elizabeth S. Cole

The author discusses current challenges to increasing family-centered practice within child welfare agencies. The article focuses on two issues: (1) child welfare's collaboration with early-intervention and family-support services and (2) maintaining family-preservation services despite growing criticism of such services.


1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Bath

Family Preservation Services, and in particular the intensive variety, have recently been attracting a lot of attention in Australia, with initiatives in at least four states. Along with the enthusiasm there has been some hostility and opposition. This paper examines the context in which the services originally developed and attempts to rationally assess their relevance for Australia.


Author(s):  
John P. Ronnau ◽  
Christine R. Marlow

The role of family preservation services in preventing out-of-home placement of children is a hot topic in the social service arena. Family preservation has much to offer as an organizing framework for practice in that one of its core values is to emphasize strengths and diversity. The authors define family preservation and describe its application to at-risk families in poverty.


1992 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice A. Thleman ◽  
Paula W. Dail

1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Dianne Temby ◽  
Margaret Cooper

The capacity and the political will of service providers to facilitate effective rehabilitation, which places the person at the centre of all rehabilitative actions, is sorely challenged in a service environment permeated by a philosophy of economic rationalism and control of clients. People who cannot imagine how they would cope or manage with a disability tend to generalise the impossibility to all people with disabilities. Stereotyping can then occur and people might then be labelled according to someone else's limited perception. This can lead to depersonalization and marginalisation of the labelled group. This has been the experience of some disabled individuals in Australian society. These sorts of attitudes and behaviours towards people with disabilities and/or chronic health problems may be driven by a worldview that is based on the functional limitations model. If an individual has reduced self-management and autonomy and is socially isolated, then other human possibilities and choices become limited, including employment. Such individuals will remain trapped in the downward spiral of limited options, disillusionment and disempowerment if rehabilitation officers and other health workers continue to do 'more of the same'.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document