Intravenous insulin tolerance test: criteria for evaluation of the growth hormone and cortisol response

1984 ◽  
Vol 104 (4_Supplc) ◽  
pp. S31-S33
Author(s):  
M. C. Alevizaki - Harhalaki ◽  
C. C. Alevizaki ◽  
H. D. Demertzi ◽  
D. G. Ikkos ◽  
A. Papas
2003 ◽  
Vol 65 (7) ◽  
pp. 809-812
Author(s):  
Masafumi OGURO ◽  
Hirotaka ISHIKAWA ◽  
Hiromichi OHTSUKA ◽  
Fumio HOSHI ◽  
Seiichi KAWAMURA

1995 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans C Hoeck ◽  
Peter Vestergaard ◽  
Poul E Jakobsen ◽  
Peter Laurberg

Hoeck HC, Vestergaard P, Jakobsen PE, Laurberg P, Test of growth hormone secretion in adults: poor reproducibility of the insulin tolerance test. Eur J Endocrinol 1995;133:305–12. ISSN 0804–4643 The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is regarded as the most reliable provocative test in the diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in adults. In the present study the test was evaluated by investigating the range of GH responses in normal adult males and females and the intra-individual reproducibility of the test. Sixteen healthy non-obese adults, eight males (median age 31.5 years) and eight females (median age 31.8 years) were tested twice with the ITT, with a minimum of 72 h between each test. The females were tested between day 3 and day 10 of their menstrual cycles. Adequate hypoglycemia was achieved in all cases with a median nadir blood glucose of 1.3 mmol/l (range 0.8–2.0). Growth hormone in serum was measured by immunoradiometric assay and low values were confirmed by a different assay. Median peak GH concentration responses to the ITT were: in males 27.9 μg/l, range 5.0–71.1 (test 1) and 30.5 μg/l, range 7.9–69.5 (test 2); and in females 9.0 μg/l, range 4.1–17.9 (test 1) and 8.4 μg/l, range 0.09–42.4 (test 2). The rise in GH concentration during the ITT was higher in males than in females. In the males, all stimulated GH values were ≥5.0 μg/l. In the females, four out of 16 tests gave values below 5.0 μg/l and in one test the GH value was around the detection limit of the assays. There was poor reproducibility during repeated testing, with no correlation between the results of the two tests. The results did not correlate to the magnitude of the hypoglycemia. The results of this study illustrate the complexity of the regulation of GH secretion and indicate that the ITT is less useful for diagnosing GH deficiency in adults than previously anticipated. The diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults and especially in adult females should not be based on the results of a single ITT alone. Hans C Hoeck, Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg Regional Hospital, Reberbansgade, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark


Peptides ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 657-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiko Kano ◽  
Hitoshi Sugihara ◽  
Mariko Sudo ◽  
Mototsugu Nagao ◽  
Taro Harada ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 777-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazunori KAGEYAMA ◽  
Takeshi NIGAWARA ◽  
Satoru SAKIHARA ◽  
Shinobu TAKAYASU ◽  
Ken TERUI ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A621-A622
Author(s):  
Ahmad Yehia Ghamlouche ◽  
Fouad Alzaroui ◽  
Tamara Altaweel ◽  
Adel Alwakeedi ◽  
Hassan A Khan ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is the current standard for the diagnosis of pituitary diseases such as growth hormone deficiencies (GHD). Previous reports indicated that the ITT as having a high adverse event profile, and the cosyntropin test as being sensitive enough to diagnose GHD in adults. The purpose of this study is to validate the safety and efficacy of the ITT. Design: Over 400 ITT tests were conducted over the course of 3 years from (2017-2020) at our facility. This study is only focused on adult physiology (Cohort Age 16 - 78) and excludes any pediatric tests. An important measure, time spent in critical state (Tc), is done to know the expected time a patient is to remain hypoglycemic, both for patient expectations and clinician logistics. We did not use a CGM, instead drew blood samples on set intervals for glucose measurements. Since the measurements aren’t continuous, a consistent overestimation is done for all subject encounters to capture the maximum time spent in hypoglycemia. Insulin like growth factor one (IGF-1) was measured before the test was conducted and is listed in the spreadsheet. Growth hormone peaks were and the time to reach that peak (Tp) were also measured. This time is calculated from the listed time of the first dosage of insulin to the time of the GH peak. Other measures listed in the spreadsheet include a brief medical history of the patient, their age, weight, gender, and the blood pressure and heart rate measured at test completion. Any immediate interventions such as intravenous fluid injections were listed. Symptoms of hypoglycemia are excluded as a complication of the test. This is due to the inherent nature of the ITT whose goal is to drop one’s blood sugar past normal ranges. Results: Our results show (0.45%) rate of adverse events. 2 patients in the entire cohort suffered from seizures during their hypoglycemic period. Both of them were successfully aborted with Ativan, and patients were monitored until recovery from post ictal state and discharged home with stable vitals and no acute symptoms. It was later discovered these patients had remote history of epilepsy and should’ve been excluded from this trial. Of the remaining 448 subject encounters, (20%) of them required urgent intervention to BP. Zero of those patients suffered any other symptoms or ongoing adverse effects. 5 patients underwent the ITT twice, again, with no adverse effects. Conclusion: No permanent adverse events or hospitalizations were reported. Based on our findings the clinical safety concerns of the ITT test are minimal compared with the benefit of obtaining an accurate diagnosis in this patient cohort, if done within the correct protocol. Using IGF-1 measures as a determinant of GHD is wildly inaccurate as seen in our results. Combining IGF-1 with the Cosyntropin test is not a good enough measure for diagnosing GHD. The ITT test remains the most accurate and reliable test available today.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document