scholarly journals Sitagliptin 100 mg vs glimepiride 1–3 mg as an add-on to insulin and metformin in type 2 diabetes (SWIM)

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 748-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jothydev Kesavadev ◽  
Pradeep Babu Sadasivan Pillai ◽  
Arun Shankar ◽  
Gopika Krishnan ◽  
Sunitha Jothydev

Objective To compare the effect of sitagliptin (100 mg) vs glimepiride (1–3 mg) as add-on therapy in Indian type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients on treatment with insulin and metformin (SWIM study). Research design and methods This 24-week, controlled, open-label study randomized T2DM patients (n = 440) receiving a stable dose of metformin and insulin combination therapy to sitagliptin (100 mg) or glimepiride (1–3 mg) as add-on therapy. Baseline HbA1c was ≥7.3% and ≤8.5%. After a 6-week titration period for glimepiride (dose titrated every 2 weeks by 1 mg up to a maximum of 3 mg daily), patients were continued for 18 weeks on their respective tolerable doses of glimepiride (ranging from 1 mg to 3 mg) or sitagliptin (100 mg) along with metformin and insulin. Results Greater reductions in HbA1c and TDD of insulin were achieved with sitagliptin compared to glimepiride. HbA1c targets and reductions in TDD were achieved by more patients on sitagliptin than on glimepiride. Reductions in both body weight and BMI were also noted among patients on sitagliptin when compared to those on glimepiride, and more hypoglycemic events occurred with glimepiride treatment than with sitagliptin. Conclusions Sitagliptin (100 mg), when compared to glimepiride (1–3 mg), bestowed beneficial effects to T2DM patients in terms of achieving greater glycemic control and also brought significant reductions in total daily dose of insulin required, bodyweight, BMI and hypoglycemic events. Overall, the results suggest that sitagliptin (100 mg) is a superior agent over glimepiride (1–3 mg) as an add-on to insulin–metformin therapy among Asian Indians with T2DM.

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000773
Author(s):  
Carol H Wysham ◽  
Julio Rosenstock ◽  
Marion L Vetter ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Elise Hardy ◽  
...  

IntroductionInvestigate the effects of switching from two times per day exenatide to once-weekly exenatide administered by autoinjector (exenatide once-weekly suspension by autoinjector (QWS-AI)) or treatment with exenatide QWS-AI for 1 year.Research design and methodsIn this phase III open-label study, adults with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive exenatide QWS-AI (2 mg) or exenatide two times per day (5 mcg for 4 weeks, followed by 10 mcg) for 28 weeks. During a subsequent non-randomized 24-week extension, patients who received exenatide two times per day were switched to exenatide QWS-AI and those randomized to exenatide QWS-AI continued this treatment. Efficacy measures included changes from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (A1C), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and body weight.ResultsIn total, 315 patients (mean baseline A1C of 8.5%) completed the initial 28 weeks of randomized treatment with exenatide QWS-AI (n=197) or exenatide two times per day (n=118) and were included in the 24-week extension (mean A1C of 7.0% and 7.3%, respectively, at week 28). From weeks 28–52, patients who switched from exenatide two times per day to exenatide QWS-AI had additional A1C reductions of approximately 0.5% (mean A1C change from baseline of –1.4% at week 52) and further reductions from baseline in FPG. Patients who continued exenatide QWS-AI treatment for 52 weeks showed clinically relevant A1C reductions (mean A1C change from baseline of –1.3% at week 52). Body-weight reductions achieved through week 28 were sustained at week 52 in both groups. There were no unexpected safety concerns or changes in the safety profile among patients who switched from exenatide two times per day to exenatide QWS-AI or those who continued exenatide QWS-AI treatment for 52 weeks.ConclusionsSwitching from exenatide two times per day to exenatide QWS-AI resulted in further A1C reductions and maintenance of earlier decreases in body weight, while continued therapy with exenatide QWS-AI for 52 weeks maintained A1C and body-weight reductions, without additional safety or tolerability concerns.Trial registration numberNCT01652716.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Blonde ◽  
Julio Rosenstock ◽  
Juan Frias ◽  
Andreas L. Birkenfeld ◽  
Elisabeth Niemoeller ◽  
...  

<b>Objective</b> <p><a>In the LixiLan-G trial, switching to iGlarLixi, a once-daily titratable fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine </a>100 units/mL and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) lixisenatide, improved glucose control in type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled with GLP-1 RAs over 26 weeks versus continuing prior GLP-1 RA. A prespecified, 26-week, single-arm extension of LixiLan-G aimed to determine the durability of iGlarLixi efficacy and safety over 52 weeks. </p> <p><b>Research Design and Methods</b></p> <p>Participants with T2D uncontrolled by GLP-1 RAs (HbA<sub>1c</sub> 7–9 % [53–75 mmol/mol]) were initially randomized to switch to iGlarLixi or continue prior GLP-1 RA. Those randomized to iGlarLixi who completed the 26-week primary endpoint period could continue iGlarLixi open-label treatment over a 26-week extension to assess durability of efficacy and safety.</p> <p><b>Results</b></p> <p>Glycemic control achieved with iGlarLixi at week 26 (mean HbA<sub>1c</sub> 6.7 % [50 mmol/mol]) was maintained at week 52 (mean HbA<sub>1c</sub> 6.7 % [50 mmol/mol]; mean ± standard deviation change from baseline at week 52: −1.0 ± 0.9 % [11 ± 10 mmol/mol]). Proportions of participants reaching HbA<sub>1c</sub> <7 % (53 mmol/mol) with iGlarLixi were similar at week 26 (62%) and 52 (64%), as were those reaching this target without documented symptomatic (<3.0 mmol/L) hypoglycemia (57% and 58%). Safety of iGlarLixi was similar at weeks 26 and 52, with low rates of documented symptomatic hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal events.</p> <p><b>Conclusions</b></p> The efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi at the end of the 26-week randomized treatment period was maintained over the 26-week extension period in the LixiLan-G trial.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajaa Nahra ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
Kishore M. Gadde ◽  
Jan Oscarsson ◽  
Michael Stumvoll ◽  
...  

<a><b>Objective: </b></a>Cotadutide, a <a>dual GLP-1 and glucagon receptor agonist</a>, is under development for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and type 2 diabetes. The effects of cotadutide on hepatic and metabolic parameters were evaluated in participants with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes. <p><b>Research Design and Methods:</b> In this phase 2b study, 834 adults with BMI ≥25kg/m<sup>2</sup> and type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (glycated hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] of 7.0%─10.5% [53─91 mmol/mol]) were randomized to double-blind cotadutide 100µg (n=100), 200µg (n=256), or 300µg (n=256), placebo (n=110), or open-label liraglutide 1.8mg (n=110), all administered subcutaneously (NCT03235050). Coprimary endpoints were changes in HbA1c and body weight at week 14.<b> </b>The originally randomized interventions were continued to week 54.<b> </b>Liver damage biomarkers and liver fibrosis algorithms were assessed.</p> <p><b>Results</b>: Cotadutide significantly decreased HbA1c and body weight at weeks 14 and 54 versus placebo (all <i>P</i><0.001). Improvements in lipid profile, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels, <a>PRO-C3 level, fibrosis-4 index</a>, and <a>nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score</a> were observed with cotadutide 300µg versus placebo, but not with liraglutide. Weight loss with cotadutide 200µg was similar to liraglutide 1.8mg, and greater with cotadutide 300µg versus liraglutide 1.8mg. <a>The most common adverse events with cotadutide (nausea, 35%; vomiting, 17%) decreased over time. </a></p> <p><b>Conclusions: </b>Cotadutide treatment for 54 weeks improved glycemic control and weight loss in participants with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes. Ad hoc analyses demonstrated improvements in hepatic parameters and support further evaluation of cotadutide in NASH. </p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 1625-1629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juris J. Meier ◽  
Nina Schenker ◽  
Melanie Kahle ◽  
Freimut Schliess ◽  
Christoph Kapitza ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document