Early and sustained tumour volume reduction and GH/IGF1 control in patients with GH-secreting pituitary macroadenoma primarily treated with lanreotide Autogel 120 mg for 48 weeks: the PRIMARYS study

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Caron ◽  
John Bevan ◽  
Antoine Clermont ◽  
Pascal Maisonobe
2010 ◽  
Vol 162 (5) ◽  
pp. 993-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata S Auriemma ◽  
Mariano Galdiero ◽  
Ludovica F S Grasso ◽  
Pasquale Vitale ◽  
Alessia Cozzolino ◽  
...  

BackgroundSomatostatin analogs (SA) are the cornerstone in the medical treatment of acromegaly, used as either primary or adjunctive therapy. In particular, SA are effective in inducing the biochemical remission of the disease and tumor shrinkage, although only few cases of complete disappearance of the pituitary tumor in patients treated with SA as long-acting formulations have been reported. SA withdrawal has been demonstrated to keep safe levels of GH and IGF1 at least in a small subset of patients well responsive to SA, although it is generally followed by disease recurrence after several months.Case reportA 61-year-old female patient bearing a very large GH-secreting pituitary macroadenoma was treated with 12-month lanreotide Autogel (ATG), at the initial dose of 120 mg/28 days. After 3 months, GH and IGF1 levels were fully normalized, to prolong the administration interval from 28 to 56 days. After 6 months of treatment, a significant tumor shrinkage (90% of baseline size) was observed, whereas GH and IGF1 excess was still well controlled. After 12-month therapy, a complete disappearance of the pituitary tumor was observed, and the hormonal evaluation confirmed the complete biochemical remission of acromegaly. Lanreotide ATG treatment was withdrawn. The clinical, biochemical, and radiological remission of acromegaly was maintained 24 months after lanreotide ATG treatment discontinuation, without evidence of disease recurrence.ConclusionsThis report represents an exemplary case of the potentiality of treatment with lanreotide ATG in inducing a complete remission of acromegalic disease, persistent after a long period of time from treatment withdrawal.


2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias M. Dantonello ◽  
Monika Stark ◽  
Beate Timmermann ◽  
Jörg Fuchs ◽  
Barbara Selle ◽  
...  

1974 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 667-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Morasca ◽  
G. Balconi ◽  
E. Erba ◽  
P. Lelieveld ◽  
L.M. Van Putten

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
William Knight ◽  
Cara Baker ◽  
Nyree Griffin ◽  
Mark Kelly ◽  
Andrew Davies ◽  
...  

Abstract   A high Mandard score corresponds to a non-response to chemotherapy in the primary tumour in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. However, some patients experience tumour volume reduction and a nodal downstaging despite a high score. This study compares survival and recurrence patterns in these patients. Methods Clinicopathological factors were analysed using multivariable Cox regression assessing time to death and recurrence. CT estimated tumour volume change was examined in a subgroup of consecutive patients. Mean pre-chemotherapy and post chemotherapy tumour volumes were compared across Mandard groups and nodal responders. Results 555 patients were included. Median survival was 55 months (Mandard 1,2,3) and 21 months (Mandard 4,5). In the Mandard 4,5 group (332 patients), comparison between complete nodal responders and persistent nodal disease showed improved survival (90 vs 18 months), recurrence rates (locoregional 14.75% vs 28.74, systemic 24.59% vs 48.42%) and CRM positivity (22.95% vs 68.11). Complete nodal response independently predicted improved survival (HR 0.34(0.16–0.74). Post-chemotherapy tumour volume reduction was greater in patients with a complete nodal response (−16.3 cm3 vs −7.7 cm3 p 0.033) with no significant difference between Mandard groups. Conclusion: Patients with a complete nodal response to chemotherapy have significantly improved outcomes despite a poor Mandard score. High Mandard score does not correspond with a non-response to chemotherapy in all cases and patients with nodal downstaging may still benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document