Influence of BMI in response to ovarian stimulation and live birth in IVF

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Tavares ◽  
Catarina Machado ◽  
Lucinda Calejo ◽  
Gustavo Rocha ◽  
Povoa Ana Margarida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Ovarian Stimulation

The role of the growth hormone in assisted reproductive technologies cycles

GYNECOLOGY ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 6-8
Author(s):  
Andrey Y Romanov ◽  
Anastasiya G Syrkasheva ◽  
Nataliya V Dolgushina ◽  
Elena A Kalinina
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Assisted Reproductive Technologies ◽  
Polycystic Ovary ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Reproductive Technologies ◽  
Blood Levels ◽  
Main Research ◽  
Poor Ovarian Responders

The paper analyzes the literature data on the use of the growth hormone (GH) in ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Routine use of GH in ovarian stimulation in patients with a normal GH level does not increase pregnancy and childbirth rates in ART. Also, no benefits of using GH have been identified for patients with polycystic ovary syndrome, despite the increase in insulin and IGF-1 blood levels. The main research focus is to study the use of GH in patients with poor ovarian response. According to the meta-analysis conducted by X.-L. Li et al. (2017), GH in ovarian stimulation of poor ovarian responders increases the number of received oocytes, mature oocytes number, reduces the embryo transfer cancellation rate and does not affect the fertilization rate. The pregnancy and live birth rates are significantly higher in the group of GH use - by 1.65 (95% CI 1.23-2.22) and 1.73 (95% CI 1.25-2.40) times, respectively. Thus, it is advisable to use GH in ovarian stimulation in poor ovarian responders, since it allows to increases live birth rate in ART. However, further studies should determine the optimal GH dose and assesse it`s safety in ART programs.

The euploid blastocysts obtained after luteal phase stimulation show the same clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes as follicular phase stimulation-derived ones: a multicenter study

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 2598-2608
Author(s):  
Alberto Vaiarelli ◽  
Danilo Cimadomo ◽  
Erminia Alviggi ◽  
Anna Sansone ◽  
Elisabetta Trabucco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Blastocyst Transfer ◽  
Large For Gestational Age

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Are the reproductive outcomes (clinical, obstetric and perinatal) different between follicular phase stimulation (FPS)- and luteal phase stimulation (LPS)-derived euploid blastocysts? SUMMARY ANSWER No difference was observed between FPS- and LPS-derived euploid blastocysts after vitrified-warmed single embryo transfer (SET). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Technical improvements in IVF allow the implementation non-conventional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols for oncologic and poor prognosis patients. One of these protocols begins LPS 5 days after FPS is ended (DuoStim). Although, several studies have reported similar embryological outcomes (e.g. fertilization, blastulation, euploidy) between FPS- and LPS-derived cohort of oocytes, information on the reproductive (clinical, obstetric and perinatal) outcomes of LPS-derived blastocysts is limited to small and retrospective studies. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Multicenter study conducted between October 2015 and March 2019 including all vitrified-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfers after DuoStim. Only first transfers of good quality blastocysts (≥BB according to Gardner and Schoolcraft’s classification) were included. If euploid blastocysts obtained after both FPS and LPS were available the embryo to transfer was chosen blindly. The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR) per vitrified-warmed single euploid blastocyst transfer in the two groups. To achieve 80% power (α = 0.05) to rule-out a 15% difference in the LBR, a total of 366 first transfers were required. Every other clinical, as well as obstetric and perinatal outcomes, were recorded. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Throughout the study period, 827 patients concluded a DuoStim cycle and among them, 339 did not identify any transferable blastocyst, 145 had an euploid blastocyst after FPS, 186 after LPS and 157 after both FPS and LPS. Fifty transfers of poor quality euploid blastocysts were excluded and 49 patients did not undergo an embryo transfer during the study period. Thus, 389 patients had a vitrified-warmed SET of a good quality euploid blastocyst (182 after FPS and 207 after LPS). For 126 cases (32%) where both FPS- and LPS-derived good quality blastocysts were available, the embryo transferred was chosen blindly with a ‘True Random Number Generator’ function where ‘0’ stood for FPS-derived euploid blastocysts and ‘1’ for LPS-derived ones (n = 70 and 56, respectively) on the website random.org. All embryos were obtained with the same ovarian stimulation protocol in FPS and LPS (GnRH antagonist protocol with fixed dose of rec-FSH plus rec-LH and GnRH-agonist trigger), culture conditions (continuous culture in a humidified atmosphere with 37°C, 6% CO2 and 5% O2) and laboratory protocols (ICSI, trophectoderm biopsy in Day 5–7 without assisted hatching in Day 3, vitrification and comprehensive chromosome testing). The women whose embryos were included had similar age (FPS: 38.5 ± 3.1 and LPS: 38.5 ± 3.2 years), prevalence of male factor, antral follicle count, basal hormonal characteristics, main cause of infertility and previous reproductive history (i.e. previous live births, miscarriages and implantation failures) whether the embryo came from FPS or LPS. All transfers were conducted after warming in an artificial cycle. The blastocysts transferred after FPS and LPS were similar in terms of day of full-development and morphological quality. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The positive pregnancy test rates for FPS- and LPS-derived euploid blastocysts were 57% and 62%, biochemical pregnancy loss rates were 10% and 8%, miscarriage rates were 15% and 14% and LBRs were 44% (n = 80/182, 95% CI 37–51%) and 49% (n = 102/207, 95% CI 42–56%; P = 0.3), respectively. The overall odds ratio for live birth (LPS vs FPS (reference)) adjusted for day of blastocyst development and quality, was 1.3, 95% CI 0.8–2.0, P = 0.2. Among patients with euploid blastocysts obtained following both FPS and LPS, the LBRs were also similar (53% (n = 37/70, 95% CI 41–65%) and 48% (n = 27/56, 95% CI 35–62%) respectively; P = 0.7). Gestational issues were experienced by 7.5% of pregnant women after FPS- and 10% of women following LPS-derived euploid single blastocyst transfer. Perinatal issues were reported in 5% and 0% of the FPS- and LPS-derived newborns, respectively. The gestational weeks and birthweight were similar in the two groups. A 5% pre-term delivery rate was reported in both groups. A low birthweight was registered in 2.5% and 5% of the newborns, while 4% and 7% showed high birthweight, in FPS- and LPS-derived euploid blastocyst, respectively. Encompassing the 81 FPS-derived newborns, a total of 9% were small and 11% large for gestational age. Among the 102 LPS-derived newborns, 8% were small and 6% large for gestational age. No significant difference was reported for all these comparisons. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The LPS-derived blastocysts were all obtained after FPS in a DuoStim protocol. Therefore, studies are required with LPS-only, late-FPS and random start approaches. The study is powered to assess differences in the LBR per embryo transfer, therefore obstetric and perinatal outcomes should be considered observational. Although prospective, the study was not registered. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This study represents a further backing of the safety of non-conventional COS protocols. Therefore, LPS after FPS (DuoStim protocol) is confirmed a feasible and efficient approach also from clinical, obstetric and perinatal perspectives, targeted at patients who need to reach the transfer of an euploid blastocyst in the shortest timeframe possible due to reasons such as cancer, advanced maternal age and/or reduced ovarian reserve and poor ovarian response. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

P–708 Comparison of reproductive outcomes after progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with dydrogesterone versus cetrorelix to inhibit spontaneous ovulation in oocyte donation

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Moreno ◽  
P Masoli ◽  
C Sferrazza ◽  
H Leiva ◽  
O Espinosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Fertilization Rate ◽  
Oocyte Donation ◽  
Pregnancy Rates ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Reproductive Outcomes ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy ◽  
Live Births

Abstract Study question Is dydrogesterone (DYG) equivalent compared to cetrorelix with respect to clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth rate in oocyte donation (OD) cycles? Summary answer DYG is comparable to cetrorelix in terms of clinical pregnancy, but higher rates of ongoing pregnancy and live birth were observed in the DYG group What is known already Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is an ovarian stimulation regimen based on a freeze-all strategy using progestin as an alternative to GnRH analog for suppressing a premature LH surge. DYG is an oral progestin that has been studied in PPOS protocols. Published reports indicate that length of ovarian stimulation, dose of gonadotrophin needed and number of MII retrieved from PPOS cycles are comparable to short protocol of GnRH agonists during OD cycles. However, while some studies noted no differences in terms of live births, worse pregnancy rates have been reported in recipients of oocytes from PPOS cycles compared to GnRH antagonists. Study design, size, duration Prospective controlled study to assess the reproductive outcomes of OD recipients in which the donors were subjected to the DYG protocol (20mg/day) compared with those subjected to the short protocol with cetrorelix (0.25 mg/day) from Day 7 or since a leading follicle reached 14 mm. The OD cycles were triggered with triptoreline acetate and the trigger criterion was ≥3 follicles of diameter >18mm. Participants/materials, setting, methods 202 oocyte donors were included, 92 under DYG and 110 under cetrorelix. The study was performed in a private infertility center between January 2017 and December 2020. The main outcome included the rates of clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy and live births. Secondary outcomes included the number of oocytes retrieved, number of MII, fertilization rate, length of stimulation and total gonadotropin dose. Differences were tested using a Student’s t-test or a Chi2 test, as appropriate. Main results and the role of chance Compared to antagonist cycles, cycles under DYG had fewer days of stimulation (9.9 ± 0.9 vs. 10.8 ± 1.1, p<.001) and a lower total gonadotropin dose (1654 ± 402.4 IU vs. 1844 ± 422 IU, p<.001). The number of MII retrieved was no different: 16.9 (SD 6.2) with DYG and 15.4 (SD 5.8) with cetrorelix (p = 0.072). Recipients and embryo transfer (ET) characteristics were also similar between groups. The mean number of MII assigned to each recipients was 6.7 (SD 1.8) in DYG and 6.6 (SD 1.7) in cetrorelix (P = 0.446). The fertilization rate was 66.2% in DYG versus 67.6% in cetrorelix (P = 0.68). Regarding the reproductive outcomes, the overall clinical pregnancy rate in DYG group (65/87: 74.7%) and cetrorelix group (66/104: 63.4%) (p = 0.118) was similar. Meanwhile, the DYG group compared to cetrorelix group had higher rates of ongoing pregnancy (63.2% vs 45.1%; p = 0.014) and live births (54,9% vs 37.8%; p = 0.040). Limitations, reasons for caution These results should be evaluated with caution. The limitations of this study include the limited number of participants enrolled and the limited data on pregnancy outcomes. A randomized controlled trial is necessary to provide more evidence on the efficacy of the DYG protocol. Wider implications of the findings: The efficacy of PPOS protocol compared to GnRH-antagonist protocol in terms of reproductive outcomes has been little studied. PPOS using DYG yields comparable clinical pregnancy rates compared to cetrorelix in OD cycles. The differences found regarding the rates of ongoing pregnancy and live births should be further investigated. Trial registration number Not applicable

scholarly journals No effect of ovarian stimulation and oocyte yield on euploidy and live birth rates: an analysis of 12 298 trophectoderm biopsies

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1082-1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Irani ◽  
C Canon ◽  
A Robles ◽  
B Maddy ◽  
V Gunnala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Estradiol Level ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Live Birth Rates ◽  
Follicle Size ◽  
Estradiol Levels ◽  
Gonadotropin Dosage ◽  
Euploid Embryo ◽  
Euploidy Rates

STUDY QUESTION Does ovarian stimulation affect embryo euploidy rates or live birth rates (LBRs) after transfer of euploid embryos? SUMMARY ANSWER Euploidy rates and LBRs after transfer of euploid embryos are not significantly influenced by gonadotropin dosage, duration of ovarian stimulation, estradiol level, follicle size at ovulation trigger or number of oocytes retrieved, regardless of a woman’s age. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Aneuploidy rates increase steadily with age, reaching >80% in women >42 years old. The goal of ovarian stimulation is to overcome this high aneuploidy rate through the recruitment of several follicles, which increases the likelihood of obtaining a euploid embryo that results in a healthy conceptus. However, several studies have suggested that a high response to stimulation might be embryotoxic and/or increase aneuploidy rates by enhancing abnormal segregation of chromosomes during meiosis. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated a remarkable difference in euploidy rates, ranging from 39.5 to 82.5%, among young oocyte donors in 42 fertility centres, potentially suggesting an iatrogenic etiology resulting from different stimulation methods. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a retrospective cohort study that included 2230 in vitro fertilisation (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles and 930 frozen-thawed single euploid embryo transfer (FET) cycles, performed in our centre between 2013 and 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A total of 12 298 embryos were analysed for ploidy status. Women were divided into five age groups (<35, 35–37, 38–40, 41–42 and >42 years old). Outcomes were compared between different durations of stimulation (<10, 10–12 and ≥13 days), total gonadotropin dosages (<4000, 4000–6000 and >6000 IU), numbers of oocytes retrieved (<10, 10–19 and ≥20 oocytes), peak estradiol levels (<2000, 2000–3000 and >3000 pg/mL), and sizes of the largest follicle on the day of trigger (<20 and ≥20 mm). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Within the same age group, both euploidy rates and LBRs were comparable between cycles regardless of their differences in total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation, number of oocytes harvested, size of the largest follicles or peak estradiol levels. In the youngest group, (<35 years, n = 3469 embryos), euploidy rates were comparable between cycles with various total gonadotropin dosages (55.6% for <4000 IU, 52.9% for 4000–6000 IU and 62.3% for >6000 IU; P = 0.3), durations of stimulation (54.4% for <10 days, 55.2% for 10–12 days and 60.9% for >12 days; P = 0.2), number of oocytes harvested (59.4% for <10 oocytes, 55.2% for 10–19 oocytes and 53.4% for ≥20 oocytes; P = 0.2), peak estradiol levels (55.7% for E2 < 2000 pg/mL, 55.4% for E2 2000–3000 pg/mL and 54.8% for E2 > 3000 pg/mL; P = 0.9) and sizes of the largest follicle (55.6% for follicles <20 mm and 55.1% for follicles ≥20 mm; P = 0.8). Similarly, in the oldest group (>42 years, n = 1157 embryos), euploidy rates ranged from 8.7% for gonadotropins <4000 IU to 5.1% for gonadotropins >6000 IU (P = 0.3), from 10.8% for <10 days of stimulation to 8.5% for >12 days of stimulation (P = 0.3), from 7.3% for <10 oocytes to 7.4% for ≥20 oocytes (P = 0.4), from 8.8% for E2 < 2000 pg/mL to 7.5% for E2 > 3000 pg/mL (P = 0.8) and from 8.2% for the largest follicle <20 mm to 8.9% for ≥20 mm (P = 0.7). LBRs after single FET were also comparable between these groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Although this large study (2230 IVF/PGT-A cycles, 12 298 embryos and 930 single FET cycles) demonstrates the safety of ovarian stimulation in terms of aneuploidy and implantation potential of euploid embryos, a multi-centre study may help to prove the generalisability of our single-centre data. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These findings reassure providers and patients that gonadotropin dosage, duration of ovarian stimulation, estradiol level, follicle size at ovulation trigger and number of oocytes retrieved, within certain ranges, do not appear to significantly influence euploidy rates or LBRs, regardless of the woman’s age. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was received and there are no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A

scholarly journals IVF and IUI in couples with unexplained infertility (FIIX study): study protocol of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Prentice ◽  
Lynn Sadler ◽  
Sarah Lensen ◽  
Melissa Vercoe ◽  
Jack Wilkinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Lower Cost ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clomiphene Citrate ◽  
Multiple Pregnancy ◽  
Unexplained Infertility ◽  
Live Births ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Natural Conception

Abstract STUDY QUESTIONS In couples with unexplained infertility and a poor prognosis of natural conception, are four cycles of IUI with ovarian stimulation (IUI-OS) non-inferior to one completed cycle of IVF for the outcome of cumulative live birth? Are four cycles of IUI-OS associated with a lower cost per live birth compared to one completed cycle of IVF? Will four cycles of IUI-OS followed by one complete cycle of IVF result in as many live births at lower cost per live birth, than two complete cycles of IVF? Will four cycles of IUI-OS followed by two complete cycles of IVF result in more live births at lower cost per live birth, than two complete cycles of IVF alone? WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY IUI is widely used in the USA, the UK and Europe as a low cost, less invasive alternative to IVF for couples with unexplained infertility. Although three to six cycles of IUI were comparable to IVF in the three major studies carried out to date, gonadotrophin ovarian stimulation was used in the majority of cases, and this also resulted in a high multiple pregnancy rate in some studies. Ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate is known to have lower multiple pregnancy rates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The FIIX study is a multicentre, open label, parallel, pragmatic non-inferiority randomized controlled trial of 580 couples with unexplained infertility comparing four cycles of IUI-OS with clomiphene citrate and one completed cycle of IVF. Variable block randomization stratified by age and clinic with electronic allocation will be used. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Couples with poor prognosis for natural conception and who are eligible for publicly funded fertility treatment in six fertility clinics in New Zealand. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Auckland Medical Research Fund (3718892/1119003), A+ Trust, Auckland District Health Board (A + 8479), Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust (3718514). No competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12619001003167. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 15 July 2019 DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT 02/08/2019

Live birth rates in Bologna poor responders treated with ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos P. Polyzos ◽  
Milie Nwoye ◽  
Roberta Corona ◽  
Christophe Blockeel ◽  
Dominic Stoop ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Poor Responders ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Live Birth Rates
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document