Application of 3D skin culture model as a tool to study the role of immune mechanisms in chronic diabetic foot ulcers pathogenesis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryia Mashkova ◽  
Vitaly Goranov ◽  
Tatiana Mokhort ◽  
Alena Shyshko ◽  
Marina Mantachik
Author(s):  
M. A. Mashkova ◽  
T. V. Mokhort ◽  
V. A. Goranov

At the moment, a lot of scientific research focused on the role of immune mechanisms in diabetic foot ulcers development and impaired healing. A 3D skin culture system as a relevant skin model may prove valuable in investigating these mechanisms and may be a useful tool to study interactions between different cell types such as keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and immune cells. The aim of our research was to study keratinocytes and fibroblasts viability in co-culture with immune factors of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) and patients with diabetes and chronic foot ulcers in a 3D skin culture system. In this study, the multilayer 3D immunocompetent model of human skin comprising keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and mononuclears in an agarose-fibronectin gel was used. The human immortalized keratinocyte cell line, HaCaT, and primary fibroblast cell culture isolated from skin samples of healthy man in abdominal surgery were used for the 3D system. For the experiment 20 % serum of 9 patients with chronic diabetic foot ulcers (without active inflammation signs), 9 diabetic type 2 patients and 9 healthy people, and mononuclears of the same groups of patients were used. 9 experimental series with 3 repeats were carried out. Mononuclears of patients with DM2 and DM2 and diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) had a greater inhibitory effect on fibroblasts, significantly inhibiting their proliferation to a level of 83.78 [79.03; 89.53] % vs 70.18 [66.38; 72.10] % vs 95.40 [91.75; 99.05] %, H = 21.259, p <0.001 – DM2, DFS, and the control group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the cytoinhibitory effect of mononuclears on keratinocytes between different groups: 96.40 [92.82; 100.50] % vs 93.61 [86.80; 97.10] % vs 92.87 [85.15; 95.25] %, H = 4.459, p = 0.108 – control, DM2 and DFS group, respectively. Adding serum to the culture system influenced significantly the viability of neither keratynocytes – 99.40 [95.35; 102.05]  % vs 98.60 [90.55; 100.40] % vs 94.79 [91.65; 98.16] %, H = 3.030, p = 0.220 nor of fibroblasts – 95.61 [92.39; 100.19] % vs 95.80 [88.99; 102.15] % vs 96.20 [99.69; 88.70] %, H = 0.353, p = 0.838, control, DM2 and DFS group, respectively. It was determined that the fibroblasts vialability significantly decreases after introducing mononuclears of patients with DM and patients with DM and chronic diabetic foot ulcers to the co-culture system. Adding serum of these patient groups to the culture system doesn’t influence significantly the viability of skin cells.


Diabetes Care ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 855-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Stess ◽  
S. R. Jensen ◽  
R. Mirmiran

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (15) ◽  
pp. S24-S32
Author(s):  
Sumarno Adi Subrata

Lower extremity amputation is a complication of diabetic foot ulcers that can cause spiritual crisis. Integrating spiritual care into nursing practice is important to overcome this. However, studies articulating the role of nurses in spiritual care when caring for patients with diabetic foot ulcers is limited. This article aims to describe the importance of providing spiritual care for this group of patients. The interpretation of spiritual care with respect to the relationship between the patient and the family, and the role of the nurse are discussed. The findings offer a theoretical perspective on spiritual care that can be used to develop spiritual interventions, as well as prevent spiritual crises in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.


2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 219-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandrakant Munjewar ◽  
Ishaq Nabi ◽  
Santosh Gautam ◽  
Neelam Ahirwar ◽  
Poras Chaudhary ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Smith ◽  
Andrew Collier ◽  
Eleanor M. Townsend ◽  
Lindsay E. O’Donnell ◽  
Abhijit M. Bal ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Majid Moini ◽  
Mohammad R. Rasouli ◽  
Pedram Heidari ◽  
Hamid Reza Mahmoudi ◽  
Marjan Rasouli

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sivakamasundari Pichu ◽  
Bhoomika M Patel ◽  
Subbu Apparsundaram ◽  
Ramesh K Goyal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document