Extraction of Evaluation Criteria on Technology and Service Related to Smart Grid and Analysis of Relative Importance among Evaluation Criteria by AHP Method

Author(s):  
Chae-Bogk Kim
2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danijela Tadic ◽  
Predrag Popovic ◽  
Aleksandar Djukic

In this paper a new fuzzy model (FMOTPD2) is developed and by this model the measures of beliefs are determined so that one of the groups of possible therapeutic procedures is optimal for each patient of type 2 diabetes on hospital treatment. The choice of therapeutic procedure on individual level, which is one of the demands of modern medicine, means that each therapeutic procedure is to be evaluated by multiple and different criteria. In this paper, evaluation criteria are classified into two groups: (1) common criteria by which medicines used by the type 2 diabetes patients are being evaluated and (2) specific criteria, by which the patients' 1h state of health with type 2 diabetes mellitus is being estimated. Generally, the relative importance and values of these criteria are different. It is assumed that (a) the relative importance of evaluation criteria is defined by a team of medical experts and described by linguistic expressions and (b) the values of evaluation criteria are determined by evidence data, anamnesis and a diagnostic process. They can be crisp or uncertain. The most often used linguistic expressions describing the relative importance of evaluation criteria are modeled by triangular fuzzy numbers. The rest of uncertainties, which exist in developed model are described by discrete fuzzy numbers. A new algorithm for determining a unified fuzzy portrait of treated therapeutic procedures for each patient is given. It enables calculation of the measures of beliefs that some therapeutic procedures are more optimal than the others. The developed model is illustrated by examples with real word data collected in a hospital.


1985 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-145
Author(s):  
P. L.S. Ackermann ◽  
W. P.J. Van Rensburg

The relative importance of evaluation criteria as observed by bank managers in consumer banking This study has the following objectives: (i) To determine the relative importance of various evaluation criteria (as observed by bank managers) in considering the granting of credit to individuals in consumer banking; and (ii) to compare the relative importance of evaluation criteria (as observed by bank managers) with regard to the various race groups (coloureds, Indians, whites, and blacks). The sample consists of 510 managers from the consumer division of general and commercial banks. It was found that significant differences exist regarding the relative importance of the evaluation criteria (according to the perception of bank managers) with respect to the various race groups.


Information ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 481
Author(s):  
Ching Li ◽  
Chia-Wen Lee ◽  
Tzu-Chun Huang ◽  
Wei-Shiang Lai

The interactive mechanism among platform operators, content producers, and information receivers is increasingly complex in human–computer symbiosis. The purpose of this study is to identify the interactive value among platform operators, content producers, and information receivers with regard to information through the health and fitness apps by adopting an advanced Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method derived from professional perspectives of app users and operators, key opinion leaders, scholars, and officers. The AHP method was allocated weightings to the evaluation criteria from the twelve panelists from three groups of platform operators, content producers, and information receivers. After focus group interviews were conducted, four dimensions and twelve sub-dimensions of the initial health and fitness apps were obtained as follows: Content category: Monitoring, exercise, journaling, and sleeping; (2) User reviews: Fuctionality, interactivity, and criticism; (3) Content updates: New feature, correctness, and new language; (4) Platform terms: Privacy, accuracy, ownership, and right of use. The study integrated the panelists’ opinions toward health and fitness apps and analyzed the weight of each indicator according to their importance by Power Choice V2.5. The results revealed that the weights of dimensions of health and fitness apps were sorted by content category, user review, platform terms, and content update, as well as that the weights of the top six sub-dimensions were followed: monitoring, exercise, functionality, interactivity, privacy, and accuracy. Content producers suggested increasing the popularity of their products by adding new features, whereas information receivers preferred to correct problems. Content producers and information receivers graded platform terms as less essential, whereas platform operators rated platform terms higher. This study can contribute to assisting the health and fitness industry and the overall strategic operative process by identifying how the effectiveness in the procedures, estimative process, and cost-down can enhance competitiveness to further improve users experience and satisfaction.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 895-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Yu Chiu ◽  
Yuan-Duen Lee ◽  
Tsai-Yuan Lin

Not only are personal trainers the face of the personal fitness industry, they also generate a significant portion of revenue in this multi-billion dollar business. It is therefore essential to produce the best possible personnel. In order to assist the industry in selecting the best trainers, we developed a preliminary personal trainer evaluation system based on a survey of experts. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was then applied to the system. Of the three major dimensions – achievement, teaching, and service results – achievement results, which include course sales and team achievement, were identified as the most important.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document