scholarly journals Digestive Toxicities Secondary to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition Therapy – Reports of Rare Events. A Systematic Review

Author(s):  
Liliana Radulescu ◽  
Dana Crisan ◽  
Cristiana Grapa ◽  
Dan Radulescu

Background and Aims: While immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy (ICI) is exceedingly effective, these drugs are associated with various immune-related adverse effects. As gastrointestinal, hepatic or pancreatic toxicity becomes more common, various reports of rare adverse effects have emerged, leading to a significant clinical and prognostic impact. We aimed to provide a systematic review of mainly case-reports on rare events, to help physicians to make an accurate and fast diagnosis. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature, using established MeSH terms: “immune checkpoint inhibitors”, “gastrointestinal tract”, “gastrointestinal diseases”, “liver”, “pancreas”, “nivolumab”, “ipilimumab”, the subheadings “adverse effects”, “toxicity” and the supplementary concepts “pembrolizumab”, “tremelimumab”, “atezolizumab”, “avelumab”, “durvalumab”, with defined inclusion criteria. Results: From 419 manuscripts initially selected, 74 reports of rare adverse events were included in our review. Special cases of neutrophilic gastritis, hemorrhagic gastritis, or even perforations were described at upper digestive tract. Different types of colitis were found secondary to ICI such as pseudomembranous, granulomatous, collagenous and microscopic colitis or even inflammatory bowel disease. In terms of liver toxicity, we found rare reports of cholangitis, granulomatous hepatitis, lipodystrophy and hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Pancreas toxicity was rarely reported as severe pancreatitis, exocrine failure and diabetes mellitus. Conclusion: Although a complete check-up of every organ at every routine visit may not be practical, focus on symptoms, targeted laboratory and imaging testing may reveal rare organ damage. Raising awareness of the uncommon toxicities related to the immunotherapy is essential, as some rare events can lead to fatal outcomes.

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 5329
Author(s):  
Donggun Lee ◽  
Na Won Kim ◽  
Jong Yeob Kim ◽  
Joo Hyung Lee ◽  
Ji Hyun Noh ◽  
...  

Background: Although sarcopenia has been reported to predict survival in cancer patients, its impact on patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has not been thoroughly investigated. This systematic review aimed to assess the long-term oncologic impact of sarcopenia on patients who received ICIs. Methods: A systematic review of studies indexed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, up to April 1, 2021, was conducted. Studies that reported hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) based on sarcopenia in patients treated with ICIs were included. The inverse variance method was used with a random-effects model for data analysis. Results: A total of 1284 patients from 14 studies were included. Among the patients who received ICIs, patients with sarcopenia had a significant increase in overall mortality compared to patients without sarcopenia in univariate analyses (HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.20–2.29, p = 0.002) and in adjusted HRs (HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.15–2.10, p = 0.004). The same results were obtained for PFS by both univariate analysis (HR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.37–2.23, p < 0.001) and adjusted HRs (HR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.28–2.09, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Sarcopenia appears to be an effective biomarker for predicting long-term oncologic outcomes in patients receiving ICI therapy and hence plays an important role when making treatment decisions. However, the fundamental role of this association with survival should be further investigated in large cohorts and clinical trials.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filette Jeroen de ◽  
Corina Andreescu ◽  
Filip Cools ◽  
Bert Bravenboer ◽  
Brigitte Velkeniers

2021 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 76-91
Author(s):  
Elisa Agostinetto ◽  
Daniel Eiger ◽  
Matteo Lambertini ◽  
Marcello Ceppi ◽  
Marco Bruzzone ◽  
...  

ESMO Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 100244 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.B. Ulas ◽  
C. Dickhoff ◽  
F.L. Schneiders ◽  
S. Senan ◽  
I. Bahce

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document