Association Between Rapid Response Algorithms and Clinical Outcomes of Hospitalized Children

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1385-1394
Author(s):  
Jonathan G. Sawicki ◽  
Dana Tower ◽  
Elizabeth Vukin ◽  
Jennifer K. Workman ◽  
Gregory J. Stoddard ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether the implementation of clinical pathways, known as pediatric rapid response algorithms, within an existing rapid response system was associated with an improvement in clinical outcomes of hospitalized children. METHODS We retrospectively identified patients admitted to the PICU as unplanned transfers from the general medical and surgical floors at a single, freestanding children’s hospital between July 1, 2017, and January 31, 2020. We examined the impact of the algorithms on the rate of critical deterioration events. We used multivariable Poisson regression and an interrupted time series analysis to measure 2 possible types of change: an immediate implementation effect and an outcome trajectory over time. RESULTS We identified 892 patients (median age: 4 [interquartile range: 1–12] years): 615 in the preimplementation group, and 277 in the postimplementation group. Algorithm implementation was not associated with an immediate change in the rate of critical deterioration events but was associated with a downward rate trajectory over time and a postimplementation trajectory that was significantly less than the preimplementation trajectory (trajectory difference of −0.28 events per 1000 non-ICU patient days per month; 95% confidence interval −0.40 to −0.16; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Algorithm implementation was associated with a decrease in the rate of critical deterioration events. Because of the study’s observational nature, this association may have been driven by unmeasured confounding factors and the chosen implementation point. Nevertheless, the results are a promising start for future research into how clinical pathways within a rapid response system can improve care of hospitalized patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 2961-2969
Author(s):  
Minfei Yang ◽  
Lanlan Zhang ◽  
Yuwei Wang ◽  
Yue Zhan ◽  
Xiaofei Zhang ◽  
...  

Objective To assess the impact of a regional rapid response system (RRS) implemented in a Chinese Joint Commission International Hospital on the timely treatment of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs). Methods Clinical SAEs, activation periods, reasons for RSS activation, and patient outcomes were assessed using SAE response sheets at admission to the hospital and over 31 months of follow-up. Results We found that 192 events were called by medical staff and 6 were called by auxiliary staff. Reasons for the 385 RRS activations included: unconsciousness (133; 34.5%), and airway obstruction and absent carotid pulse (49 each; 12.7%). The average arrival time of the medical emergency team was 2.4 ± 0.1 minutes. There were 123 (62.1%) RRS activations during daytime working hours (8:00–17:00); CPR was performed in 86 (43.4%) cases. Outcomes of RRS were: vital signs stabilized in 82 (41.4%) patients and 61 (30.8%) patients were transferred to ICU. Conclusion Our experience showed that the regional RRS has led to better integrated multidisciplinary cooperation and reduced time for treating patients with SAEs, resulting in success of the RRS.


Resuscitation ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Calzavacca ◽  
Elisa Licari ◽  
Augustine Tee ◽  
Moritoki Egi ◽  
Andrew Downey ◽  
...  

Resuscitation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (9) ◽  
pp. 1275-1281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Chen ◽  
Lixin Ou ◽  
Ken Hillman ◽  
Arthas Flabouris ◽  
Rinaldo Bellomo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimyung Park ◽  
Yeon Joo Lee ◽  
Sang-Bum Hong ◽  
Kyeongman Jeon ◽  
Jae Young Moon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Rapid response system (RRS) has been increasingly adopted to improve patient safety in hospitals worldwide. However, predictors of survival outcome after RRS activation because of unexpected clinical deterioration are not well defined. We investigated whether hospital length of stay (LOS) before RRS activation can predict the clinical outcomes.Methods: Using a nationwide multicenter RRS database, we identified patients for whom RRS was activated during hospitalization at 9 tertiary referral hospitals in South Korea between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017. All information on patient characteristics, RRS activation, and clinical outcomes were retrospectively collected by reviewing patient medical records at each center. Patients were categorized into two groups according to their hospital LOS before RRS activation: early deterioration (LOS <5 days) and late deterioration (LOS ≥5 days). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality and multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the two groups. In addition, propensity score-matched analysis was used to minimize the effects of confounding factors.Results: Among 11,612 patients, 5,779 and 5,883 patients belonged to the early and late deterioration groups, respectively. Patients in the late deterioration group were more likely to have malignant disease and to be more severely ill at the time of RRS activation. After adjusting for confounding factors, the late deterioration group had higher 28-day mortality (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.44–1.77). Other clinical outcomes (in-hospital mortality and hospital LOS after RRS activation) were worse in the late deterioration group as well, and similar results were found in the propensity score-matched analysis (aOR for 28-day mortality 1.66, 95% CI 1.45–1.91).Conclusions: Patients who stayed longer in the hospital before RRS activation had worse clinical outcomes. During the RRS team review of patients, hospital LOS before RRS activation should be considered as a predictor of future outcome.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimyung Park ◽  
Yeon Joo Lee ◽  
Sang-Bum Hong ◽  
Kyeongman Jeon ◽  
Jae Young Moon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rapid response system (RRS) is being increasingly adopted to improve patient safety in hospitals worldwide. However, predictors of survival outcome after RRS activation because of unexpected clinical deterioration are not well defined. We investigated whether hospital length of stay (LOS) before RRS activation can predict the clinical outcomes. Methods Using a nationwide multicenter RRS database, we identified patients for whom RRS was activated during hospitalization at 9 tertiary referral hospitals in South Korea between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017. All information on patient characteristics, RRS activation, and clinical outcomes were retrospectively collected by reviewing patient medical records at each center. Patients were categorized into two groups according to their hospital LOS before RRS activation: early deterioration (LOS < 5 days) and late deterioration (LOS ≥ 5 days). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality and multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the two groups. In addition, propensity score-matched analysis was used to minimize the effects of confounding factors. Results Among 11,612 patients, 5779 and 5883 patients belonged to the early and late deterioration groups, respectively. Patients in the late deterioration group were more likely to have malignant disease and to be more severely ill at the time of RRS activation. After adjusting for confounding factors, the late deterioration group had higher 28-day mortality (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.44–1.77). Other clinical outcomes (in-hospital mortality and hospital LOS after RRS activation) were worse in the late deterioration group as well, and similar results were found in the propensity score-matched analysis (aOR for 28-day mortality 1.66, 95% CI 1.45–1.91). Conclusions Patients who stayed longer in the hospital before RRS activation had worse clinical outcomes. During the RRS team review of patients, hospital LOS before RRS activation should be considered as a predictor of future outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document