MEDICAL ASPECTS OF CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 464-468

Jesse L. Steinfeld, M.D., Surgeon General of the U.S. Public Health Service has approved the following policy statement and has designated the Bureau of Community Environmental Management as the activity within the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare to assist in the development and implementation of programs for the control of lead poisoning in children. The U.S. Public Health Service recommends that screening programs for the prevention and treatment of lead poisoning (plumbism) in children include all those who are 1 to 6 years of age and living in old, poorly maintained houses. Children exposed to other special local conditions involving lead hazards also should be screened. Lead-based paint was commonly used for interior purposes until the 1940's when it was largely replaced by titanium-based paint; therefore, children living in dilapidated or obviously deteriorating houses built prior to that time are to be given particular attention. Children who frequently visit such neighborhoods–homes of baby sitters, relatives, and playmates–also should be included in screening programs.1 Today lead-based paint is still used to some extent for the exteriors of dwellings, and this potential source of exposure to lead should not be overlooked. Children at risk should be screened periodically during the years 1 to 6, and longer if indicated. The prime goal of screening programs is the prevention of lead poisoning. The prevention of plumbism can be achieved through the early detection of children with undue absorption of lead, followed immediately by remedial action before the state of overt poisoning is reached. Consequently, screening programs should not be limited to the detection and treatment of children with lead poisoning.

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 488-489
Author(s):  
Jane S. Lin-Fu

As a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics and a Pediatric Consultant to the Maternal and Child Health Service, U.S. Public Health Service, I have noted with interest in the Newsletter (December 15, 1970) that the Academy's Committee on Environmental Hazards has endorsed the U.S. Public Health Service's Statement, "Medical Aspects of Childhood Lead Poisoning," recently released by the Surgeon General. But I am rather surprised at the exceptions the Committee took to the Statement, and I would like to take exception to these exceptions.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-468
Author(s):  
Robert D. Fischer

The recent articles by Piomelli et al.1 and Chisolm2 represent another welcomed investigation and discussion on the use of free erythrocyte porphyrin (FEP) test in the control of lead poisoning. These investigators, however, have greatly overstated the potential of this test as a primary screening tool in community lead control programs. The policy statement of the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service, developed in consultation with Dr. Chisolm, has established that "The prime goal of screening programs is the prevention of lead poisoning" [emphasis added].3


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1957 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 917-918
Author(s):  
HARRY F. DIETRICH

I greatly appreciate the opportunity you gave me to withdraw from publication the letter which precedes. I have reviewed (as objectively as I can) pertinent events subsequent to the writing of that letter. In part they have been: 1. The approval of an additional $2,500,000 to the U.S. Public Health Service for work on "Asiatic flu." 2. A reaffirmation by the Surgeon General that we are really in for it unless there is mass immunization. 3. A natural parroting of this dire warning by State, County and City Health Departments.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 655-655
Author(s):  
J. F. L.

The office of Surgeon General has off and on been slated for termination. But that was before Ronald Reagan's Surgeon General, the patriarchal, independent-minded C. Everett Koop, emerged from obscurity to become the telegenic evangelist of the AIDS crisis. Tolerated by the Reagan White House as a bargain-priced diversion from its own lassitude on AIDS, Koop demonstrated how the office could be used for mass education by a public health champion with a rhetorical flair. In TV parlance, the Surgeon General became the "nation's doctor." Koop's visibility was enhanced when he exercised the long-neglected right of Public Health Service officers to deck themselves out in navy-cut gold-braided uniforms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document