Evaluation of the Total Column Ozone and Tropospheric Ozone in the CCMI-1 Models over East Asia

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-229
Author(s):  
Seo-Yeon Kim ◽  
Sunmin Park ◽  
Seok-Woo Son
Keyword(s):  
East Asia ◽  
Tropospheric Ozone ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Total Column

scholarly journals Trend Quality Ozone from NPP OMPS: the Version 2 Processing

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard McPeters ◽  
Stacey Frith ◽  
Natalya Kramarova ◽  
Jerry Ziemke ◽  
Gordon Labow
Keyword(s):  
Trend Analysis ◽  
Tropospheric Ozone ◽  
Scattered Light ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Average Bias ◽  
Latitude Zone ◽  
Zonal Average ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Total Column

Abstract. A version 2 processing of data from two ozone monitoring instruments on Suomi NPP, the OMPS nadir ozone mapper and the OMPS nadir ozone profiler, has now been completed. The previously released data were useful for many purposes but were not suitable for use in ozone trend analysis. In this processing, instrument artifacts have been identified and corrected, an improved scattered light correction and wavelength registration have been applied, and soft calibration techniques were implemented to produce a calibration consistent with data from the series of SBUV/2 instruments. The result is a high quality ozone time series suitable for trend analysis. Total column ozone data from the OMPS nadir mapper now agree with data from the SBUV/2 instrument on NOAA 19 with a zonal average bias of −0.2 % over the 60° S to 60° N latitude zone. Differences are somewhat larger between OMPS nadir profiler and N19 total column ozone, with an average difference of −1.1  % over the 60° S to 60° N latitude zone and a residual seasonal variation of about 2 % at latitudes higher than about 50 degrees. For the profile retrieval, zonal average ozone in the upper stratosphere (between 2.5 and 4 hPa) agrees with that from NOAA 19 within ±3 % and an average bias of −1.1 %. In the lower stratosphere (between 25 and 40 hPa) agreement is within ±3 % with an average bias of +1.1 %. Tropospheric ozone produced by subtracting stratospheric ozone measured by the OMPS limb profiler from total column ozone measured by the nadir mapper is consistent with tropospheric ozone produced by subtracting stratospheric ozone from MLS from total ozone from the OMI instrument on Aura. The agreement of tropospheric ozone is within 10 % in most locations.

scholarly journals Trend quality ozone from NPP OMPS: the version 2 processing

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 977-985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard McPeters ◽  
Stacey Frith ◽  
Natalya Kramarova ◽  
Jerry Ziemke ◽  
Gordon Labow
Keyword(s):  
Trend Analysis ◽  
Tropospheric Ozone ◽  
Scattered Light ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Average Bias ◽  
Latitude Zone ◽  
Zonal Average ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Total Column

Abstract. A version 2 processing of data from two ozone monitoring instruments on Suomi NPP, the OMPS nadir ozone mapper and the OMPS nadir ozone profiler, has now been completed. The previously released data were useful for many purposes but were not suitable for use in ozone trend analysis. In this processing, instrument artifacts have been identified and corrected, an improved scattered light correction and wavelength registration have been applied, and soft calibration techniques were implemented to produce a calibration consistent with data from the series of SBUV/2 instruments. The result is a high-quality ozone time series suitable for trend analysis. Total column ozone data from the OMPS nadir mapper now agree with data from the SBUV/2 instrument on NOAA 19 with a zonal average bias of −0.2 % over the 60∘ S to 60∘ N latitude zone. Differences are somewhat larger between OMPS nadir profiler and N19 total column ozone, with an average difference of −1.1 % over the 60∘ S to 60∘ N latitude zone and a residual seasonal variation of about 2 % at latitudes higher than about 50∘. For the profile retrieval, zonal average ozone in the upper stratosphere (between 2.5 and 4 hPa) agrees with that from NOAA 19 within ±3 % and an average bias of −1.1 %. In the lower stratosphere (between 25 and 40 hPa) agreement is within ±3 % with an average bias of +1.1 %. Tropospheric ozone produced by subtracting stratospheric ozone measured by the OMPS limb profiler from total column ozone measured by the nadir mapper is consistent with tropospheric ozone produced by subtracting stratospheric ozone from MLS from total ozone from the OMI instrument on Aura. The agreement of tropospheric ozone is within 10 % in most locations.

scholarly journals Are there urban signatures in the tropospheric ozone column products derived from satellite measurements?

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 3807-3826
Author(s):  
J. Kar ◽  
J. Fishman ◽  
J. K. Creilson ◽  
A. Richter ◽  
J. Ziemke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tropospheric Ozone ◽  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Mixing Ratio ◽  
Satellite Measurements ◽  
Ratio Distribution ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Ozone Column ◽  
Total Column

Abstract. In view of the proposed geostationary satellite missions to monitor air quality from space, it is important to first assess the capability of the current suite of satellite instruments to provide information on the urban scale pollution. We explore the possibility of detecting urban signatures in the tropospheric column ozone data derived from TOMS/SBUV and OMI/MLS satellite data. We find that distinct isolated plumes of tropospheric ozone near several large and polluted cities around the world may be detected in these data sets. The ozone plumes generally correspond with the tropospheric column NO2 plumes around these cities as observed by the SCIAMACHY instrument. Similar plumes are also seen in tropospheric mean ozone mixing ratio distribution after accounting for the surface and tropopause pressure variations. The total column ozone retrievals indicate fairly significant sensitivity to the lower troposphere over the polluted land areas, which might help explain these detections. These results indicate that UV measurements may, in principle, be able to capture the urban signatures and may have implications for future missions using geostationary satellites.

scholarly journals Spatial mapping of ground-based observations of total ozone

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 4487-4505 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.-L. Chang ◽  
S. Guillas ◽  
V. E. Fioletov
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Interpolation ◽  
Stochastic Partial Differential Equation ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Source Of Information ◽  
Total Column ◽  
Ozone Levels

Abstract. Total column ozone variations estimated using ground-based stations provide important independent source of information in addition to satellite-based estimates. This estimation has been vigorously challenged by data inhomogeneity in time and by the irregularity of the spatial distribution of stations, as well as by interruptions in observation records. Furthermore, some stations have calibration issues and thus observations may drift. In this paper we compare the spatial interpolation of ozone levels using the novel stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE) approach with the covariance-based kriging. We show how these new spatial predictions are more accurate, less uncertain and more robust. We construct long-term zonal means to investigate the robustness against the absence of measurements at some stations as well as instruments drifts. We conclude that time series analyzes can benefit from the SPDE approach compared to the covariance-based kriging when stations are missing, but the positive impact of the technique is less pronounced in the case of drifts.

scholarly journals Characterizing ozone throughout the atmospheric column over the tropical Andes from in situ and remote sensing observations

Elem Sci Anth ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
María Cazorla ◽  
René Parra ◽  
Edgar Herrera ◽  
Francisco Raimundo da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Atmospheric Ozone ◽  
Tropical Andes ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Study Region ◽  
Boundary Layer Height ◽  
Mixing Ratios ◽  
The Andes ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Total Column

In this study, we characterize atmospheric ozone over the tropical Andes in the boundary layer, the free troposphere, and the stratosphere; we quantify each contribution to total column ozone, and we evaluate the performance of the multi-sensor reanalysis (MSR2) in the region. Thus, we present data taken in Ecuador and Peru (2014–2019). The contribution from the surface was determined by integrating ozone concentrations measured in Quito and Cuenca (Ecuador) up to boundary layer height. In addition, tropospheric and stratospheric column ozone were quantified from ozone soundings (38) launched from Quito during the study time period. Profiles were compared against soundings at Natal (SHADOZ network) for being the closest observational reference with sufficient data in 2014–2019. Data were also compared against stratospheric mixing ratios from the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (Aura MLS). Findings demonstrate that the stratospheric component of total column ozone over the Andes (225.2 ± 8.9 Dobson Units [DU]) is at similar levels as those observed at Natal (223.3 ± 8.6 DU), and observations are comparable to Aura MLS data. In contrast, the tropospheric contribution is lower over the Andes (20.2 ± 4.3 DU) when compared to Natal (35.4 ± 6.4 DU) due to a less deep and cleaner troposphere. From sounding extrapolation of Quito profiles down to sea level, we determined that altitude deducts about 5–7 DU from the total column, which coincides with a 3%–4% overestimation of the MSR2 over Quito and Marcapomacocha (Peru). In addition, when MSR2 data are compared along a transect that crosses from the Amazon over Quito, the Ecuadorian coast side, and into the Pacific, observations are not significantly different among the three first locations. Results point to coarse reanalysis resolution not being suitable to resolve the formidable altitude transition imposed by the Andes mountain chain. This work advances our knowledge of atmospheric ozone over the study region and provides a robust time series of upper air measurements for future evaluations of satellite and reanalysis products.

scholarly journals Comparison of profile total ozone from SBUV(v8.6) with GOME-type and ground-based total ozone for 16-yr period (1996 to 2011)

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 10081-10115 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. W. Chiou ◽  
P. K. Bhartia ◽  
R. D. McPeters ◽  
D. G. Loyola ◽  
M. Coldewey-Egbers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Strong Evidence ◽  
Total Ozone ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Monthly Data ◽  
Latitude Band ◽  
Ozone Data ◽  
Standard Deviations ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Total Column

Abstract. This paper describes the comparison of the variability of total column ozone inferred from the three independent multi-year data records, namely, (i) SBUV(v8.6) profile total ozone, (ii) GTO(GOME-Type total ozone), and (iii) Ground-based total ozone data records covering the 16-yr overlap period (March 1996 through June 2011). Analyses are conducted based on area weighted zonal means for (0–30° S), (0–30° N), (50–30° S), and (30–60° N). It has been found that on average, the differences in monthly zonal mean total ozone vary between −0.32 to 0.76 % and are well within 1%. For "GTO minus SBUV", the standard deviations and ranges (maximum minus minimum) of the differences regarding monthly zonal mean total ozone vary between 0.58 to 0.66% and 2.83 to 3.82% respectively, depending on the latitude band. The corresponding standard deviations and ranges regarding the differences in monthly zonal mean anomalies show values between 0.40 to 0.59% and 2.19 to 3.53%. The standard deviations and ranges of the differences "Ground-based minus SBUV" regarding both monthly zonal means and anomalies are larger by a factor of 1.4 to 2.9 in comparison to "GTO minus SBUV". The Ground-based zonal means, while show no systematic differences, demonstrate larger scattering of monthly data compared to satellite-based records. The differences in the scattering are significantly reduced if seasonal zonal averages are analyzed. The trends of the differences "GTO minus SBUV" and "Ground-based minus SBUV" are found to vary between −0.04 and 0.12% yr−1 (−0.11 and 0.31 DU yr−1). These negligibly small trends have provided strong evidence that there are no significant time dependent differences among these multi-year total ozone data records. Analyses of the deviations from pre-1980 level indicate that for the overlap period of 1996 to 2010, all three data records show gradual recovery at (30–60° N) from −5% in 1996 to −2% in 2010. The corresponding recovery at (50–30° S) is not as obvious until after 2006.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document