The Use of a Single-Fiber Fragmentation Test to Study Environmental Durability of Interfaces/Interphases Between Epoxy and a Glass Fiber

1993 ◽  
Vol 304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol L. Schuute ◽  
Walter McDonough ◽  
Masatoshi Shioya ◽  
Donald L. Hunston

AbstractThis work examines the usefulness of the single-fiber fragmentation test in studying the durability of fiber/matrix interfaces/interphases. This test measures the critical length/diameter ratio (L/D) of the fiber fragments formed in the test and relates this length to the interface's strength, or ability to transfer load. In the work reported here, we immersed samples of epoxy containing a single-glass fiber - that was previously sized with an epoxy-compatible coating - in either 65 or 75 °C water and tested after different times of exposure. In general, this ratio increased as a function of time of exposure to water. During exposure at 75 °C, the fibers' L/D in the samples did not increase significantly until after the sample reached its “apparent” equilibrium content of water ∼ (3.0 wt%). Because there was no significant measurable change in the tensile modulus between wet and dry samples, we cannot attribute these differences in L/D to changes in the resin's properties due to plasticizing by water. A small percentage of samples exposed at 65 °C did not show a significant increase in L/D, and in these cases the moisture produced a marked roughening of the fiber surface along the fiber/matrix interface. One possible explanation is that the attack by moisture degrades the interface, thus reducing its strength with a corresponding increase in the L/D. To varying degrees, however, the attack by moisture also degrades the E-glass fiber. This attack by moisture roughened the surfaces of the fibers and increased the distribution and/or size of the critical flaws, thus reducing both the strength of the fiber and the L/D. Based on our preliminary results, it appears that the singlefiber test has the potential to be useful for studying the durability of the resin/matrix interface providing that the influence of the environmental agent on all of the components of the model composite: resin, fiber, and interface/phase, is considered.

1995 ◽  
Vol 385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiqun Gu ◽  
Guo-Quan Lu ◽  
H. Felix Wu ◽  
Stephen L. Kampe ◽  
P. Ross Lichtenstein ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTAdhesion at fiber-matrix interface in fiber-reinforced composites plays an important role in controlling the mechanical properties and overall performance of composites. Among the many available tests applicable to the composite interfaces, vibration damping technique has the advantages of being nondestructive as well as highly sensitive. We set up an optical system to measure the damping tangent delta of a cantilever beam, and correlated the damping data in glass-fiber reinforced epoxy-resin composites with transverse tensile strength which is also a qualitative measurement of adhesion at fiber-matrix interface. Four different composite systems containing three different glass-fiber surface treatments were tested and compared. Our experimental results showed an inverse relationship between damping contributed by the interface and composite transverse tensile strength.


1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 2881-2887
Author(s):  
Shamachary Sathish ◽  
Madhu S. Madhukar ◽  
John H. Cantrell ◽  
William T. Yost

Scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM) was used to obtain the critical fragmentation length of a 7-μm-diameter carbon fiber embedded in an optically transparent epoxy matrix and was subjected to a standard fiber fragmentation test. The SAM-assessed critical fragmentation length of 356 ± 59.5 μm compared favorably with the value 341 ± 52.3 μm obtained independently from commonly used photoelastic techniques. Additionally, the SAM images allowed an assessment of regions of fiber-matrix debond, including the measurement of an average debond of 61.0 ± 11.8 μm along the fiber from the fragment ends, which could not be obtained with photoelastic methods. The application of SAM to the assessment of optically opaque composite materials is explained in this paper.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 100757
Author(s):  
Aarón Rivas-Menchi ◽  
Narciso Acuña-González ◽  
Alex Valadez-González ◽  
Pedro J. Herrera-Franco

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document