Ridge Expansion and Immediate Placement With Piezosurgery and Screw Expanders in Atrophic Maxillary Sites: Two Case Reports

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Kelly ◽  
Dennis Flanagan
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Time ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Narrow Ridge ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Ridge Width ◽  
Cone Beam Computerized Tomography

Endosseous dental implants may require bone augmentation before implant placement. Herein is described an approach to edentulous ridge expansion with the use of piezosurgery and immediate placement of implants. This may allow for a shortened treatment time and the elimination of donor-site morbidity. Two cases are reported. This technique uses a piezoelectric device to cut the crestal and proximal facial cortices. Space is then created with motorized osteotomes to widen the split ridge. This technique allows for expansion of narrow, anatomically limiting, atrophic ridges, creating space for immediate implant placement. The facial and lingual cortices provide support with vital osteocytes for osteogenesis. The 2 patients presented had adequate bone height for implant placement but narrow edentulous ridges. In patient 1 at site #11, the ridge crest was 3.12 mm thick and was expanded to accept a 4.3 mm × 13 mm implant. The resulting ridge width was 8.88 mm, which was verified using cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT). In patient 2 at site #8 and site #9, the narrow ridge was expanded using the same technique to accept 2 adjacent 3.5 mm × 14 mm implants. The implants were restored to a functional and esthetic outcome.

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement: Report of Case Series

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-115
Author(s):  
M. Koray ◽  
I. Ozcan ◽  
B. Alkan ◽  
O. Kesmez ◽  
H. Tanyeri
Keyword(s):  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Implant Positioning ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

SUMMARYObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of immediate postextraction implant placement. Immediate placement of dental implants have been claimed of the potential advantages such as reductions in the number of surgical interventions, a shorter treatment time, an ideal 3-dimensional implant positioning, the presumptive preservation of alveolar bone at the site of the tooth extraction and soft tissue aesthetics.Method: In this case series we reported to extract 15 teeth in 12 patients (8 males; 4 females, mean age: 46.08 years) and replace the teeth with implants immediately.Results: There were no signs of inflammation or infection and none of the patients had complaints subsequently. All implants were osseointegrated at the time of abutment connection. Postoperative healing was uneventful in all of the patients. No complications were observed.Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, immediate implant placement was a predictable treatment.

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement: Success or Failure?

2013 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 046-048
Author(s):  
Ashutosh Nirola ◽  
Shallu Bhardwat
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Dental Trauma ◽  
Pathological Process ◽  
Missing Teeth ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Placement Success

AbstractEdentulism is most often the result of repeated tooth extraction from combined pathological process and/or dental trauma. Dental implants have emerged to be a highly successful and predictable treatment modality for replacement of missing teeth. Dental implants are the devices that are surgically inserted into the jaw bone to support a single prosthetic tooth and serve as abutments or as cosmetic replacements for missing teeth. Timing of implant placement following tooth removal may be important and this concept has challenged the original treatment protocol. This article aims to present two case reports of immediate placement of implant.

scholarly journals Comparing Dual-zone Immediate Implant Placement and Socket-shield Technique for Ridge Width Changes in Maxilla: a Prospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rola Shadid
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Ridge Width ◽  
Clinically Significant

Abstract Background: The socket-shield technique still requires more scientific based evidence to be recommended as everyday clinical practice, the aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the facial-palatal ridge dimensional changes that occurred after a minimum of 8 months following flapless dual-zone (DZ) immediate implant placement and socket-shield (SS) immediate placement in the maxilla.Methods: A total of 19 patients who received 20 implants were included with 10 implants (MegaGen AnyRidge) were placed for each treatment, DZ and SS. Cast models were made at least 8 months after implant placement to assess the dimensional ridge changes by measuring the facial palatal ridge width on implant sites (T) at six designated points starting from gingival margin (0, 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7) and comparing it with the corresponding measurement on contralateral tooth site (C). Results: All 20 placed implants demonstrated successful osseointegration and survived 9-24 months following implantation (survival rate 100%). Two out of ten cases of SS group presented with minor manageable complications of external shield exposure. DZ group showed an average facial-palatal reduction of nearly 0.3 mm; however, there were no significant differences between T and C (P =.47), while SS group revealed a mean gain in ridge contour of approximately 0.2 mm with also no significant differences existed between T and C (P = .64) in the 8-months follow-up. When comparing between the two treatments, there were significant differences in ridge width changes (P < .05), indicating better preservation of the ridge contour at 8-months for SS treatment.Conclusion: The socket shield immediate implant placement produced better preservation of the ridge contour at 8-months post-extraction; however, the dual-zone technique yielded non clinically significant reduction in the ridge contour at the same follow-up.

scholarly journals Full Mouth Rehabilitation Using Alveolar Ridge Splitting Technique with Immediate Implant Placement in the Maxilla and Delayed Implant Placement in the Mandible: A Case Report with 4 Years Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
pp. 81-89
Author(s):  
Houssam Abou Hamdan ◽  
Talal H. Salame ◽  
Georges Aoun
Keyword(s):  
Success Rates ◽  
Splitting Technique ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Healing Phase ◽  
Full Mouth Rehabilitation ◽  
Narrow Ridge ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Delayed Implant Placement

The bone split technique is used to increase the width of a narrow ridge for implant placement with high success rates. This technique was performed on a 53-year-old patient with bilateral mandibular posterior edentulous and fully edentulous maxilla. Implants placement was performed afterward with two-step modus operandi on the mandible and immediate placement on maxilla. A successful prosthetic rehabilitation was done following the healing phase. This approach led to full restoration of function and esthetic with a predictable outcome.

scholarly journals Splitting expansion and palatal approach technique for implant placement in severely resorpted maxilla

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e26710817214
Author(s):  
Mauricio Aguirre ◽  
Gabriel Fiorelli Bernini ◽  
Fernando Arciniegas ◽  
Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Oral Rehabilitation ◽  
Splitting Technique ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Expansion Technique ◽  
Implant Dentistry

The treatment of patients with atrophic maxillary alveolar ridge who need oral rehabilitation is a common problem in Implant Dentistry. One of the techniques used is the alveolar ridge splitting technique to expand alveolar ridges with a horizontal bone decrease. The palatal approach technique is also recommended in cases with an insufficient thickness of the alveolar ridge for the placement of implants in the bone envelope. The aim of this work is to describe the splitting expansion and palatal approach technique for the treatment of atrophic maxillary ridges with a horizontal bone deficit and rehabilitation with implant placement. This technique combines the alveolar ridge splitting/expansion technique and the palatal approach technique. It allows alveolar ridge expansion using piezosurgery and immediate placement of implants without thread exposure in the palatal aspect. With one surgical time, this technique avoids the fracture of the buccal bone plate due to the expansion, eliminates the need for bone graft and donor-site morbidity, is simple and effective, and shows great esthetic results and implant success.

scholarly journals Diagnosis and treatment of extraction sockets in preparation for implant placement: report of three cases

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márcio José Rodrigues Barcelos ◽  
Arthur Belém Novaes Júnior ◽  
Marcio Baltazar Conz ◽  
Nassin David Harari ◽  
Guaracilei Maciel Vidigal Júnior
Keyword(s):  
Bone Defect ◽  
Root Resorption ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Receptor Site ◽  
Wall Defect ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Defect Morphology ◽  
Subsequent Intervention

This article addresses diagnostic parameters that should be assessed in the treatment of extraction sockets with dental implant placement by presenting three case reports that emphasize the relevance of the amount of remaining bone walls. Diagnosis was based on the analysis of clinical and radiographic parameters (e.g.: bone defect morphology, remaining bone volume, presence of infections on the receptor site). Case 1 presents a 5-wall defect in the maxillary right central incisor region with severe root resorption, which was treated with immediate implant placement. Cases 2 and 3 present, respectively, two- and three-wall bone defects that did not have indication for immediate implants. These cases were first submitted to a guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure with bone graft biomaterial and membrane barriers, and the implants were installed in a second surgical procedure. The analysis of the preoperative periodontal condition of the adjacent teeth and bone defect morphology is extremely important because these factors determine the choice between immediate implant or GBR treatment followed by implant installation in a subsequent intervention.

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement in Infected Sockets: A Consecutive Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish Kakar ◽  
Kanupriya Kakar ◽  
Minas D. Leventis ◽  
Gaurav Jain
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Bone Graft Substitute ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

Introduction: Immediate placement of implants in a fresh post-extraction socket is an increasingly popular and established treatment option. However, active infection in the extraction site may adversely affect the outcome of this procedure. This study was designed to assess the clinical results of immediate placement of dental implants in infected extraction sockets using a standardized protocol, which included (a) the use of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser for the decontamination of the infected socket prior to implant insertion, and (b) the utilization of an in situ hardening alloplastic bone graft substitute to augment the gap between the implant surface and the labial plate of bone. Patients and Methods: A retrospective record review was used to identify 68 patients who had implants placed as per the described protocol. A total of 126 implants were placed in 68 patients (65 implants in the maxilla, 61 implants in the mandible). The implants were loaded 136 ± 73 days (mean ± standard deviation; range: 37–400 days) after implant placement. Eight patients (16 implants) were subsequently lost to follow up. Results: 105 of the 110 implants (95.45%) placed immediately in the infected sites using the described protocol survived after prosthetic loading. Conclusion: Immediate implant placement in previously infected sites using the protocols mentioned in our study with laser decontamination of the socket, grafting with an in situ hardening alloplastic bone graft material and non-submerged healing shows a similar survival rate to the published success rates for immediate implants placed in non-infected sites.

scholarly journals Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone-Surgical Considerations

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksa Marković ◽  
T. Mišić
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Time ◽  
Implant Positioning ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Individual Assessment ◽  
Complex Procedure ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Implant Therapy ◽  
And Function ◽  
Selection Of

Summary Implant placement in the esthetic zone is a complex procedure and requires a restoration-driven approach. Proper selection of patients and implant together with individual assessment of the risk of esthetic complications are very important. Correct 3D-implant positioning and sufficient bone volume should provide long-term esthetic and function. Esthetic region is a zone in which expectations and possibilities collide. Clinician should bring the important decision on the appropriate time of implant placement. Immediate implant placement is particularly challenging in the esthetic zone. Patient desire for reduced treatment time should be weighed against the possible risk factors. Protocol of immediate implant placement in conditions of unfavourable gingival biotypes, the lack of bone or soft tissue in patients with a high smile line lead to esthetic failure which is very important in the esthetic region.

Comparison of Delayed Implant Placement vs Immediate Implant Placement Using Resonance Frequency Analysis: A Pilot Study on Rabbits

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 543-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish T. Kunnekel ◽  
Mohit T. Dudani ◽  
Chandrasekharan K. Nair ◽  
E. M. Naidu ◽  
G. Sivagami
Keyword(s):  
Resonance Frequency ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Placement Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Resonance Frequency Analysis ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Delayed Implant Placement

Ten identical implants were equally divided into 2 groups. In the immediate placement (control) group, implants were placed immediately following osteotomy preparation, and in the delayed placement (test) group, implants were placed 2 weeks following osteotomy preparation, in rabbit femurs. Implant stability quotient values for both groups were measured using resonance frequency analysis immediately following placement and at day 40. Results were statistically analyzed and indicate that delayed placement of implants leads to faster rates of osseointegration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document