Empirical verification of a theoretical model for e-service convenience

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 57-79
Author(s):  
김영국
2009 ◽  
Vol 119 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 34-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Gurpegui ◽  
Dolores Jurado ◽  
M. Carmen Fernández-Molina ◽  
Obdulia Moreno-Abril ◽  
Juan D. Luna ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Niksa Alfirevic ◽  
Anita Talaja

The aim of this chapter is to provide an insight into the interaction of innovation and learning through an integrative view of knowledge management and dynamic capabilities approaches. Firstly, theoretical foundations of the dynamic capabilities perspective and knowledge management are presented. The chapter further explores the existing theoretical linkages between knowledge management and the dynamic capabilities approach, as well as their potential impact on organizational performance, within the framework of human resource practices, relevant for achieving successful knowledge transfer. The existing theoretical foundations are used to provide a generalization, leading to an integrative theoretical model, which should serve as a basis for further empirical verification.


Management ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-87
Author(s):  
Bogdan Nogalski ◽  
Przemysław Niewiadomski

Summary Based on theoretical knowledge, own professional experience and conducted research, according to the authors, the paper’s objective is to develop and empirically verify the theoretical model of implementation competences of the executive employees of manufacturing companies of the agricultural machinery sector. The main objective achievement required to formulate and reach partial objectives, which include: a) discussion and organisation of terminological issues in terms of understanding the term of implementation competences, b) development of a general model of the executive employees’ implementation competences, which is a sign of knowledge, skills, personality features, attitudes and values, c) empirical verification of the theoretical model; prioritisation of individual implementation competences in the assessment of executive employees or owners of selected companies and determination of competence weaknesses, which are characteristic of the executive personnel of these companies.


1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Levesque ◽  
Nicole Ricard ◽  
Francine Ducharme ◽  
Andre Duquette ◽  
Jean-Pierre Bonin

Crisis ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maila Upanne

This study monitored the evolution of psychologists' (n = 31) conceptions of suicide prevention over the 9-year course of the National Suicide Prevention Project in Finland and assessed the feasibility of the theoretical model for analyzing suicide prevention developed in earlier studies [ Upanne, 1999a , b ]. The study was formulated as a retrospective self-assessment where participants compared their earlier descriptions of suicide prevention with their current views. The changes in conceptions were analyzed and interpreted using both the model and the explanations given by the subjects themselves. The analysis proved the model to be a useful framework for revealing the essential features of prevention. The results showed that the freely-formulated ideas on prevention were more comprehensive than those evolved in practical work. Compared to the earlier findings, the conceptions among the group had shifted toward emphasizing a curative approach and the significance of individual risk factors. In particular, greater priority was focused on the acute suicide risk phase as a preventive target. Nonetheless, the overall structure of prevention ideology remained comprehensive and multifactorial, stressing multistage influencing. Promotive aims (protective factors) also remained part of the prevention paradigm. Practical working experiences enhanced the psychologists' sense of the difficulties of suicide prevention as well as their criticism and feeling of powerlessness.


2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 346-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Brenner ◽  
David L. Vogel ◽  
Daniel G. Lannin ◽  
Kelsey E. Engel ◽  
Andrew J. Seidman ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Jones ◽  
Chelsea R. Willness ◽  
Stephan Dilchert

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document