scholarly journals Rupture of a Giant Caesarean Scar Endometriosis Nodule - A Case Report and Literature Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arora BK
2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Moawia E. Hummeida ◽  
Eltayeb Abdel Rahman ◽  
Abdallah Ahmed

Author(s):  
Garima Kumari

 Endometriosis is defined by the presence and growth of ectopic functional endometrial tissue outside the uterus. The symptoms are nonspecific, typically involving abdominal wall pain at the time of menstruation. It commonly follows obstetrical and gynecological surgeries. The diagnosis is frequently made only after excision of scar the diseased tissue. A case report of 34 year old female patient presenting with scar endometriosis 7 years after her last LSCS (lower segment caesarean section). The patient came with the complaint of supra pubic swelling since 6 months, which was growing slowly. Her menstrual history was regular, but she had lower abdominal pain during menstruation. On clinical history, examination and USG finding the swelling was diagnosed as scar endometriosis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-21
Author(s):  
Efterpi Tingi

Although it is uncommon, extrapelvic endometriosis can form a discrete mass known as an abdominal wall endometrioma. The incidence of abdominal wall endometriomas has been estimated to be 0.03% to 0.15% of all cases of endometriosis. We report a case of scar endometriosis in Pfannesteil scar in a 31 year old woman, who presented six years following an emergency Caesarean Section, complaining of some lumps on her incision scar. The patient underwent laparotomy followed by the excision of five endometriotic nodules.


Author(s):  
Fatimazahra Cherrabi ◽  
Mounir Moukit ◽  
Jaouad Kouach ◽  
Driss Moussaoui Rahali ◽  
Mohammed Dehayni

Endometriosis is a common disorder in women of reproductive age but is rarely observed in abdominal scar after caesarean section. The authors report a case of 35-year-old woman referred for a painful lump at caesarean scar. Preoperative diagnosis of caesarean scar endometriosis was made on the basis of clinical examination and radiological imaging and confirmed histologically after large surgical excision of the mass. Increasing awareness of this rare entity among clinicians can help in early diagnosis and appropriate treatment.


Author(s):  
Sigit Purbadi ◽  
Gatot Purwoto ◽  
Hariyono Winarto ◽  
Kartiwa H. Nuryanto ◽  
Laurensia Scovani ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-93
Author(s):  
Deepa Kapoor ◽  
Vijayendra S. Kanwar ◽  
Kanwar Vikrant Singh ◽  
Manish Sharma

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imane Khachani ◽  
Abdelhai Filali Adib ◽  
Rachid Bezad

Endometriosis is defined by the presence and growth of ectopic functional endometrial tissue outside the uterus. Scar endometriosis has been described following obstetrical and gynecological surgery. It is a rare condition, though probably on the rise, due to the considerable increase of cesarean sections performed worldwide. Its physiopathology is complex; its symptomatology is rich and diverse but thorough clinical examination along with ultrasound imaging and potentially pretherapeutic cytologic evaluation are usually efficient in diagnosing the condition. Treatment is mostly surgical. We report the case of a cesarean section scar endometriosis, managed at a tertiary level center and emphasize the diagnosis and treatment options.


2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-57
Author(s):  
P Gupta ◽  
S Gupta

 Endometriosis is defined as presence of functioning endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. Endometriosis can sometimes occur in a previous surgical scar. Scar endometriosis is rare and difficult to diagnose. It mostly follows obstetrical and gynecological surgeries. This condition is often confused with other surgical conditions. We are reporting one case of scar endometriosis involving rectus sheath following cesarean section. The patient required wide surgical excision of the lesion. The pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of this rare condition are being discussed. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njog.v9i2.11764  


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 530-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Mollo ◽  
Carlo Alviggi ◽  
Alessandro Conforti ◽  
Luigi Insabato ◽  
Giuseppe De Placido

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document