scholarly journals An Experiential Resident Module for Understanding Social Determinants of Health at an Academic Safety-Net Hospital

MedEdPORTAL ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacie Schmidt ◽  
Stacy Higgins ◽  
Maura George ◽  
Alanna Stone ◽  
Jada Bussey-Jones ◽  
...  
Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dotun Ogunyemi ◽  
Rolando Mantilla ◽  
Abhinav Markus ◽  
Aubrey Reeves ◽  
Suyee Win ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19072-e19072
Author(s):  
Rebecca N. W. Tsai ◽  
Muhammad M. Qureshi ◽  
Stephanie Losi ◽  
Michael A. Dyer ◽  
Minh Tam Truong ◽  
...  

e19072 Background: Routine electronic health record (EHR)-based screening and resource referral to address social determinants of health (SDOH) have been established in adult primary care clinics and the emergency department of New England’s largest safety-net hospital. The burden of SDOH in safety-net oncology patients is less well-studied. This study aimed to understand the social needs of this vulnerable patient population and evaluate the need for implementation of SDOH screening in the oncology clinic. Methods: Patients with lung or head and neck cancer seen in consultation in the Department of Radiation Oncology at Boston Medical Center between 3/2019-1/2020 were identified. EHRs were reviewed for receipt of THRIVE, an EHR-based screening and referral model addressing SDOH. Associations between patient demographics and SDOH screening were evaluated. Results: A total of 104 head and neck (n = 53; 51%) and lung (n = 51; 49%) patients were identified. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range 57.5-72). The majority of patients were male (71.2%), and English-speaking (82%). Whites, Blacks, and Asians comprised 43%, 38%, and 3% of patients, respectively. Fifteen patients were Hispanic (14%). Patients were most likely to have private health insurance (n = 41; 39%), followed by joint Medicare-Medicaid plans including senior and community health plans for elderly (n = 27; 26%), Medicaid (n = 17; 16%), and Medicare (n = 17; 16%). 83 of 104 patients (79.8%) were screened for at least one SDOH domain, with 55 patients (66%) screened before presentation in radiation oncology clinic. Transportation to medical appointments (16%), food insecurity (14%), and inability affording medications (10%) were the most prevalent concerns among these oncology patients. Housing insecurity, utilities, caregiving, unemployment, and education were identified social concerns for 4-5% of patients. The majority of patients who had at least one social need requested resources to assist them (71%). Age, gender, race, language, and insurance status were not associated with receipt of the SDOH screener (p≥0.1). Conclusions: Safety-net oncology patients report significant social needs. Routine SDOH screening and resource referral should be considered in these vulnerable patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew W. Kreuter ◽  
Tess Thompson ◽  
Amy McQueen ◽  
Rachel Garg

There has been an explosion of interest in addressing social needs in health care settings. Some efforts, such as screening patients for social needs and connecting them to needed social services, are already in widespread practice. These and other major investments from the health care sector hint at the potential for new multisector collaborations to address social determinants of health and individual social needs. This article discusses the rapidly growing body of research describing the links between social needs and health and the impact of social needs interventions on health improvement, utilization, and costs. We also identify gaps in the knowledge base and implementation challenges to be overcome. We conclude that complementary partnerships among the health care, public health, and social services sectors can build on current momentum to strengthen social safety net policies, modernize social services, and reshape resource allocation to address social determinants of health. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health, Volume 42 is April 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 46-46
Author(s):  
Lindsey A Hildebrand ◽  
Brett Dumas ◽  
Charles Milrod ◽  
James Hudspeth

Introduction: Folate deficiency is a known cause of megaloblastic anemia. Serum folate level is therefore a common component of the workup for megaloblastic and other anemias. Following mandatory fortification of grain products with folic acid in the US in 1998, folate deficiency has become relatively rare in both the general population and in hospitalized patients. Some authors have suggested that serum folate levels should be tested rarely if at all in countries with mandatory folic acid fortification given low rates of deficiency, high cost per diagnosis of deficiency, and low rates of supplementation for those found to be deficient. However, given persistent racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in folate deficiency, these conclusions may not apply to all populations. In this study, we examine the rate at which serum folate testing detected folate deficiency in an urban safety net hospital and the characteristics of patients found to be folate deficient. Methods: All serum folate tests performed on inpatients and emergency department patients in 2018 at a large safety net hospital in Boston were reviewed. Serum folate levels under 4 ng/mL were considered deficient per WHO criteria. We reviewed the charts of all patients found to be folate deficient, collecting demographic data; data concerning social determinants of health; and clinical data such as hematologic lab data, stated reason for testing, and pertinent disease states such as malnutrition and substance use. We also noted whether the medical team acted upon the folate deficiency. Finally, we performed a cost analysis. Results: Out of 1368 patients whose serum folate was tested, 76 patients (5.5%) met criteria for folate deficiency. Of those patients, chart review found that hematologic abnormality was a documented cause of testing for 63%. Overall, 79% of folate deficient patients were anemic, but only 20% had a macrocytic anemia. 42% had a documented diagnosis of malnutrition. Common social determinants in patients found to be folate deficient include birth outside of the US (25%), homelessness (12%), and alcohol use disorder (29%). Of those found to be folate deficient, 93% were either started on folic acid supplementation or had already been prescribed supplementation prior to testing (5%). Given that our institution charges $71 per folate test, the expected charges per deficient test would total $1278. Discussion: While the decreased incidence of folate deficiency after fortification has led many to conclude that serum folate tests have limited utility, our data show that this conclusion may not apply to all populations. The 5.5% rate with which testing detects folate deficiency at our institution, with 46% of 2018 income from Medicaid, was markedly higher than the 0.4% rate reported in a similar study done at nearby hospital that derived 14% of 2018 income from Medicaid (Theisen-Toupal et al. J Hosp. Med. 2013). Comparisons to other studies are limited, as the cutoff for folate deficiency varies significantly between institutions. However, the markedly higher frequency with which folate deficiency was detected at our institution as compared to others suggests that folate testing may still have a role within safety net and many public hospital systems. In addition, serum folate testing may be more cost effective at such hospitals. At our hospital, the charge per deficient folate test was $1278, while previously published data from the nearby hospital described above showed a charge of over $35,000 per result under 4 ng/mL (Theisen-Toupal et al. J Hosp Med 2013). In addition, our results showed that deficient folate results usually prompted change in management. At our hospital, over 90% of folate deficient patients were prescribed a folic acid supplement at discharge, while prior studies reported rates of supplementation in the range of 0-65% (e.g. Ashraf et al. J Gen Intern Med 2008). This may reflect greater cognizance among our providers of nutritional deficiencies associated with social determinants of health common to our patient population. As our results indicated high rates of anemia, malnutrition, immigrant status, and substance use disorders among folate deficient patients, future research may include comparisons between patients found to have normal vs low folate levels. Identifying correlations between folate deficiency and other patient characteristics may help to target testing towards those most likely to benefit. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Benoit ◽  
Leah Shumka ◽  
Kate Vallance ◽  
Helga Hallgrímsdóttir ◽  
Rachel Phillips ◽  
...  

In the last few decades there has been a resurgence of interest in the social causes of health inequities among and between individuals and populations. This ‘social determinants’ perspective focuses on the myriad demographic and societal factors that shape health and well-being. Heeding calls for the mainstreaming of two very specific health determinants - sex and gender - we incorporate both into our analysis of the health gap experienced by girls and women in Canada. However, we take an intersectional approach in that we argue that a comprehensive picture of health inequities must, in addition to considering sex and gender, include a context sensitive analysis of all the major dimensions of social stratification. In the case of the current worldwide economic downturn, and the uniquely diverse Canadian population spread over a vast territory, this means thinking carefully about how socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, immigrant status, employment status and geography uniquely shape the health of all Canadians, but especially girls and women. We argue that while a social determinants of health perspective is important in its own right, it needs to be understood against the backdrop of broader structural processes that shape Canadian health policy and practice. By doing so we can observe how the social safety net of all Canadians has been eroding, especially for those occupying vulnerable social locations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document