scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in multimorbid outpatients with very high cardiovascular risk

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 3578
Author(s):  
N. V. Izmozherova ◽  
A. A. Popov ◽  
V. M. Bakhtin
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Very High ◽  
Group 1

Aim. To analyze the efficacy and safety of statin therapy in multimorbid outpatients with very high cardiovascular risk in actual clinical practice.Material and methods. The study included 131 patients with an established very high cardiovascular risk. History and anthropometric data were collected. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was calculated; patients were divided into groups of moderate (№ 1, ≤6 points) and high (№ 2,> 6 points) multimorbidity. The frequency of prescribing statins, the range of doses used, the achievement of lipid metabolism targets, and the incidence of adverse effects were evaluated.Results. The median of the CCI was 6 (5÷8) points. Group 1 included 72 patients, group 2 — 59 patients. Statins received 87 (66,4%) patients, more often in group 1 (n=54) than 2 (n=33), p=0,026. The minimum doses were taken by 17 patients, the mean — 66, the maximum — 4. Patients of group 2 received higher dosages (χ2 =9,3, p=0,010). The target level of total cholesterol was achieved in 8 (6,1%) patients, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol — no one (0,0%). Of the 106 patients ever taking statins, they were withdrawn in 19 (17,9%) patients. The reason for discontinuation in 7 patients were adverse effects, in 5 — the high cost of therapy; in 7 patients, the reason was identified. Adverse effects were recorded in 12 (11,3%) patients; there were no differences between groups (p=0,118).Conclusion. Patients with a very high cardiovascular risk are characterized by high multimorbidity. Statins are less commonly prescribed for patients with severe polymorbidity, but at higher doses. Despite the sufficient prescribing statins and the use of mean doses, target lipid levels were not achieved. The presence of multimorbidity was not associated with an increase in the incidence of statin adverse effects.

scholarly journals Possibilities of combined hypolipidemic therapy in different categories of high and very high cardiovascular risk patients (a pilot study)

2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 66-73
Author(s):  
O. V. Tsygankova ◽  
O. V. Timoshchenko ◽  
L. D. Latyntseva
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Total Cholesterol ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Total Cholesterol Level ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Very High

Aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combined use of statins with ezetimibe in patients of various nosological groups of high and very high cardiovascular risk. Material and methods. A prospective interventional non-randomized study included 40 people, mean age 60.7±9.5 years, high and very high cardiovascular risk, who did not receive statin therapy or took statins without reaching the target low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol values. Patients were recommended to receive high-intensity statin therapy in combination with ezetimibe for 3 months. Biochemical parameters were determined by standard enzymatic methods and the beginning of combined lipid-correcting therapy and after 3 months. Results. In patients with high cardiovascular risk, the level of total cholesterol decreased by 39.7 % 3 months after treatment (6.8 ± 2.5 and 4.7 ± 2.5 mmol/L; p = 0.0001), the level of LDL cholesterol by 52.2 % (4.6 ± 2.4 and 2.8 ± 2.2 mmol/L; p = 0.0001), the TG level by 26 % (2.7 ± 1.1 and 2.0 ± 1.0 mmol/L; p = 0.008). In the group of patients with very high cardiovascular risk, we also noted a decrease in the total cholesterol level by 39.1 % (6.4 ± 1.4 and 4.4 ± 1.2 mmol/L; p = 0.0001), the level of LDL cholesterol by 45.5 % (4.4 ± 1.4 and 2.5 ± 0.9 mmol/L; p = 0.0001). We did not find statistically significant changes in the remaining lipid parameters. LDL cholesterol targets were achieved in 64 % of patients with high and 52 % of very high cardiovascular risk. There were no significant changes in activity of alanine and aspartate amino transferases, content creatine phosphokinase, glucose and glycated hemoglobin, glomerular filtration rate. Conclusions. Initial combination therapy with statin and ezetimibe is well tolerated and can reduce LDL cholesterol levels by 2 times within 3 months in various categories of patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk.

scholarly journals Features and main problems of treating patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk with statins in real clinical practice (according to the data of the “PRIORITET” research)

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 52-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Yu. Martsevich ◽  
Yu. V. Lukina ◽  
N. P. Kutishenko ◽  
N. A. Dmitrieva ◽  
T. A. Gomova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Target Level ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Lipid Pattern ◽  
Very High ◽  
Real Clinical Practice ◽  
Group 1

Aim. To determine the features and main problems of statin therapy, as well as assess the possibility of achieving the target level of lipid pattern in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) in real clinical practice.Material and methods. The design of the “PRIORITET” observational program is an open observational study. Patients with high and very high CVR were divided into 3 groups in accordance with the initial data: (1) not taking statins, (2) taking statins, but not reaching the target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, (3) taking statins with the achievement of the target LDL-C level, which is justified in replacing the statin inside the class — adverse effects (AE), high price, etc. Within 12 weeks 3 visits of patients to hospitals were carried out: baseline visit (B0), visit 1 month after the study initiation (B1) and visit 3 months after the study initiation (B3). The choice of atorvastatin or rosuvastatin was assessed by the doctors.Results. Groups 1, 2 and 3 included 112, 170 and 16 people, respectively. At B0, 145 (48,7%) patients were prescribed atorvastatin, and 153 (51,3%) — rosuvastatin. Three people dropped out of the study to B3, 295 patients completed the program. Lipid pattern of 285 patients were analyzed: 121 (41%) people (101 with very high CVR and 20 with high CVR) achieved the target LDL-C level, the remaining 164 (59%) patients (CVR — 156 and 8, respectively) — no. The most pronounced dynamics of LDL=C level was revealed in group 1, the differences between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 are highly statistically significant (p<0,0001). There were no differences in the frequency of reaching the target LDL-C level between patients taking atorvastatin or rosuvastatin. The target level of LDL-C (p=0,003) in the treatment of rosuvastatin in patients with high CVR was reached significantly more often than in patients with very high CVR. Also 3 non-serious AEs were reported. On average, in 9% of cases, reaching the target level of LDL-С during visits B1 and B3 was wrong interpreted by the attending physicians.Conclusion. The main problems of statin therapy in real clinical practice are the wrong interpretation of reaching the target level of LDL-C, inertness of doctors in titrating of statins doses and achieving the target level of lipid pattern. It may be the cause of reduced efficiency and deterioration of lipid-lowering therapy results in patients with high and very high CVR. The results of the “PRIORITET” study demonstrated the possibility of improving the practice of statins use and its accordance with clinical guidelines.Skibitsky V. V. on behalf of the working group of the “PRIORITET” researchWorking Group of the “PRIORITET” study: Voronina V. P. (Moscow), Zelenova T. I. (Moscow), Sladkova T.A. (Moscow), Alekseeva A. I. (Tula), Barabanova T. Yu. (Tula), Zotova A. S. (Tula), Kolomeitseva T. M. (Tula), Prikhod’ko T. N. (Tula), Pazelt E. A. (Nizhny Novgorod), Khramushev N. Yu. (Nizhny Novgorod), Skibitsky A. V. (Krasnodar), Alekseeva V. V. (Saratov), Lazareva E. V. (Saratov).

Atorvastatin-Therapie in der Praxis – LDL-Werte bei Patienten mit sehr hohem kardiovaskulären Risiko

2017 ◽  
Vol 142 (16) ◽  
pp. 1249-1252
Author(s):  
Ulrich Laufs ◽  
Christina Jannowitz ◽  
David Pittrow
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Subjective Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Current Guidelines ◽  
Very High

AbstractCurrent information on the utilisation of atorvastatin under clinical practice conditions is limited. The cross sectional study DISCOVER documented in the period from June until December 2014 dose and effects on lipids in ambulatory patients at very high cardiovascular risk, who were treated with atorvastatin monotherapy (original drug or generics). Of 2625 patients (mean age 66.1 ± 10.8 years, 62.1 % males), 47.0 % had coronary heart disease (CHD), 25.1 % type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and 27.9 % CHD plus concomitant DM. Mean treatment duration on atorvastatin was 92.6 ± 109.6 weeks, mean atorvastatin dose at time of documentation was 27.9 ± 15.8 mg/d. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) < 70 mg/dL was achieved by 10.5 % of the total cohort (7.5 % in DM, 9.3 % in CHD, and 15.2 % in CHD+DM). In contrast, according to physicians’ subjective assessment, 62.7 % of patients reached their individual LDL-C target (with small differences between groups). In conclusion, the LDL-C target level < 70 mg/dL as recommended by current guidelines is achieved only in a minority of atorvastatin treated patients at very high cardiovascular risk.

scholarly journals Optimization of the Statin Therapy Algorithm in Outpatient Practice: Adherence and Economic Benefits

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Davitashvili ◽  
D. V. Nebieridze ◽  
N. M. Akhmedzhanov ◽  
A. S. Lishuta ◽  
A. S. Safaryan
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Cardiovascular Prevention ◽  
Statin Treatment ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Therapy Regimen ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Very High ◽  
Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention ◽  
Group 1

The high prevalence of lipid metabolism disorders in the Russian population and their contribution to cardiovascular risk require an optimization of their pharmacotherapy in clinical practice.Aim. To study adherence to recommended treatment, additional clinical and economic benefits of a titration-free statin therapy regimen.Material and methods. Ambulatory patients (n=300) with a high or very high risk of hypercholesterolemia who have indications for statin treatment for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases is included in a non-randomized trial. Patients are divided into 2 groups. Group 1 had a titration regimen of statins in accordance with current recommendations (group 1A [n=50] – primary cardiovascular prevention; group 1B [n=100] – secondary cardiovascular prevention). Group 2 received a titration-free statin regimen in fixed doses (group 2A [n=50] – primary cardiovascular prevention; group 2B [n=100] – secondary cardiovascular prevention). Patients were prescribed atorvastatin (10-80 mg/day) or rosuvastatin (10- 40 mg/day). Group 1 patients had visits to the doctor after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months from the start of statin use, group 2 patients after 3 and 12 months. Treatment adherence, effects on surrogate and hard endpoints, and cost-effectiveness of the two statin regimens were evaluated.Results. The target level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after 12 months in group 2 was achieved in 56.4% of patients versus 53.4% in group 1. The average level of LDL-C decreased by 1.84±0.44 mmol / l in group 2 versus a decrease of 1.61±0.47 mmol / L in group 1. The costeffectiveness ratio was 9658.72 rubles in group 2 versus 8341.73 rubles in group 1 for a 1 mmol / l LDL-C level decrease in 1 patient within a year.An increase in annual costs per patient in group 2 compared with group 1 by 75.76 rubles reduced the relative risk of developing a combined endpoint by 1% per year.Conclusion. The use of a titration-free statin treatment regimen allowed us not only to more effectively control of LDL-c levels in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk compared to the traditional statin therapy regimen, but also to obtain economic advantages in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk. 

scholarly journals Features and main problems of treating patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk with statins in real clinical practice (according to the data of the “PRIORITET” research)

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 52-61
Author(s):  
S. Yu. Martsevich ◽  
Yu. V. Lukina ◽  
N. P. Kutishenko ◽  
N. A. Dmitrieva ◽  
T. A. Gomova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Target Level ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Lipid Pattern ◽  
Very High ◽  
Real Clinical Practice ◽  
Group 1

Aim. To determine the features and main problems of statin therapy, as well as assess the possibility of achieving the target level of lipid pattern in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) in real clinical practice.Material and methods. The design of the “PRIORITET” observational program is an open observational study. Patients with high and very high CVR were divided into 3 groups in accordance with the initial data: (1) not taking statins, (2) taking statins, but not reaching the target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, (3) taking statins with the achievement of the target LDL-C level, which is justified in replacing the statin inside the class — adverse effects (AE), high price, etc. Within 12 weeks 3 visits of patients to hospitals were carried out: baseline visit (B0), visit 1 month after the study initiation (B1) and visit 3 months after the study initiation (B3). The choice of atorvastatin or rosuvastatin was assessed by the doctors.Results. Groups 1, 2 and 3 included 112, 170 and 16 people, respectively. At B0, 145 (48,7%) patients were prescribed atorvastatin, and 153 (51,3%) — rosuvastatin. Three people dropped out of the study to B3, 295 patients completed the program. Lipid pattern of 285 patients were analyzed: 121 (41%) people (101 with very high CVR and 20 with high CVR) achieved the target LDL-C level, the remaining 164 (59%) patients (CVR — 156 and 8, respectively) — no. The most pronounced dynamics of LDL=C level was revealed in group 1, the differences between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 are highly statistically significant (p<0,0001). There were no differences in the frequency of reaching the target LDL-C level between patients taking atorvastatin or rosuvastatin. The target level of LDL-C (p=0,003) in the treatment of rosuvastatin in patients with high CVR was reached significantly more often than in patients with very high CVR. Also 3 non-serious AEs were reported. On average, in 9% of cases, reaching the target level of LDL-С during visits B1 and B3 was wrong interpreted by the attending physicians.Conclusion. The main problems of statin therapy in real clinical practice are the wrong interpretation of reaching the target level of LDL-C, inertness of doctors in titrating of statins doses and achieving the target level of lipid pattern. It may be the cause of reduced efficiency and deterioration of lipid-lowering therapy results in patients with high and very high CVR. The results of the “PRIORITET” study demonstrated the possibility of improving the practice of statins use and its accordance with clinical guidelines.Skibitsky V. V. on behalf of the working group of the “PRIORITET” researchWorking Group of the “PRIORITET” study: Voronina V. P. (Moscow), Zelenova T. I. (Moscow), Sladkova T.A. (Moscow), Alekseeva A. I. (Tula), Barabanova T. Yu. (Tula), Zotova A. S. (Tula), Kolomeitseva T. M. (Tula), Prikhod’ko T. N. (Tula), Pazelt E. A. (Nizhny Novgorod), Khramushev N. Yu. (Nizhny Novgorod), Skibitsky A. V. (Krasnodar), Alekseeva V. V. (Saratov), Lazareva E. V. (Saratov).

scholarly journals Association of body mass index with non-achievement of target low-density lipoprotein level in older patients at very high cardiovascular risk: a multicentre study

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H T Nguyen ◽  
A H Nguyen ◽  
H M Lam ◽  
T T Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Low Density ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Very High

Abstract Introduction Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) is a well-established risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nonetheless, the association of body mass index (BMI) with non-achievement of target LDL-c level in older patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at very high cardiovascular risk is unknown. Purpose To investigate whether BMI is associated with non-achievement of target LDL-c level in older patients with T2D at very high cardiovascular risk. Methods From December 2019 to June 2020, in this multicentre prospective cross-sectional study, we enrolled 733 consecutive outpatients aged ≥60 years with T2D at very high cardiovascular risk in whom LDL-c levels could be measured after any stable lipid-lowering therapy for ≥6 months. Achievement of target lipid level was assessed based on the 2019 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology for dyslipidaemia. Factors associated with non-achievement of target LDL-c level were determined using logistic regression analysis. Results Of the total cases (age, 68.6±7.2 years; men, 51.3%), 654 patients (89.2%) did not achieve an aggressive target LDL-c level of &lt;1.4 mmol/L. Target non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of &lt;2.2 mmol/L and triglyceride level of &lt;1.7 mmol/L were not achieved in 87.9% and 56.2% of the patients, respectively. In the multivariate model, BMI was the only factor associated with failure to achieve target LDL-c level, but not other factors such as age, sex, education level, smoking, and comorbidities. The adjusted odds ratio were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.24–3.21; P=0.84) for underweight, 1.57 (95% CI, 0.87–2.81; P=0.13) for overweight, and 2.63 (95% CI, 1.43–4.83; P=0.002) for obesity (normal weight was set as reference) status. Conclusions Non-achievement of target LDL-c level is highly prevalent in older patients with T2D at very high cardiovascular risk. Obesity, defined by BMI, can be a factor associated with non-achievement of the target. The findings highlight the importance of management of lipid levels in older patients with T2D. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1

scholarly journals Drug Correction of Vascular Remodeling in Patients with Hypertension: Results of 52-Week Prospective Study ARTERIA-AG

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-220
Author(s):  
O. V. Fedorishina ◽  
K. V. Protasov ◽  
A. M. Torunova
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Vascular Remodeling ◽  
Fixed Combination ◽  
Augmentation Index ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Very High

Aim. To study the long-term dynamics of vascular remodeling in patients with hypertension and high and very high cardiovascular risk when statin is added to antihypertensive therapy with a fixed combination of calcium antagonist and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor.Material and methods. Hypertensive patients (n=75) with high and very high cardiovascular risk (age 51.5 [44;58] years) were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups. The first group (n=36) received a fixed combination of amlodipine and lisinopril in starting dose of 5/10 mg/day. The second group (n=39) received the same antihypertensive therapy and additionally rosuvastatin (20 mg/day). The follow-up period was 52 weeks. The effect of therapy on the following parameters was evaluated: level of office and average daily blood pressure (BP), central BP in the aorta, augmentation index (AIx), pulse wave velocity (PWV), endothelium-dependent brachial artery vasodilation, carotid intima-media complex thickness, carotid arteries plaque height, and blood lipid profile indicators.Results. A significant decrease in office and average daily BP was found in both groups: from 171.5 (152;194)/104.5 (97;112) to 140.0 (129;154)/87.0 (83;95) mm Hg and from 142.1 (135;153)/86.7 (83;97) to 124.6 (119;133)/76.5 (73;80) mm Hg, respectively, in the 1st group; from 169.5 (160;190)/103.5 (95;109) to 135.0 (125;141)/83.0 (77;88) mm Hg and from 139.9 (136;152)/86.2 (80;92) to 125.1 (118;134)/74.0 (70;81) mm Hg, respectively, in the 2nd group (p<0.001 for all changes). The frequency of reaching the target office BP level was higher in the 2nd group (p=0.031). Significant decrease in total cholesterol by 33.1% and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 50.0% was observed in the group 2. Central BP in the aorta decreased in both groups; the degree of central BP reduction did not differ significantly. AIx decreased from 36.5 (24;41)% to 25.0 (15;36)% (p=0.04) in the 1st group and from 36.0 (30;41)% to 24.0 (20;32)% in the 2nd group (p<0.0001) with a more pronounced decrease in AIx after 24 weeks of therapy (-4.8% and -9.4%, respectively, p=0.036). This trend continued at the end of the observation (-6.4% and -10.8%, respectively, p=0.08). Carotid-femoral and carotid-radial PWV decreased only in the 2nd group from 9.5 (8.2;10.7) to 8.3 (7.6;8.9) m/s (p=0.003) and from 9,6 (8.5;10.6) to 8.4 (7.9;9.3) m/s (p=0.01), respectively. A significant decrease in the thickness of the intima-media from 1.08 (1.0;1.2) to 1.02 (0.9;1.1) cm (p<0.0001) and the height of the plaque from 2.2 (2,2;1.7) to 2.1 (2.1;1.7) mm (p=0.001) was found in the 2nd group.Conclusion. Addition of rosuvastatin to the fixed combination of amlodipine and lisinopril in treatment of hypertensive patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk was accompanied by a more frequent (compared with amlodipine and lisinopril only) achievement of the target office BP level and more pronounced reduction in the following indicators: augmentation index, carotid-femoral and carotid-radial PWV, intima-media thickness, plaque height, total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol blood levels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document